What is going to happen is that if you are a Republican, you will be viewed by a voter as someone that will outlaw abortions at the moment of conception. The trigger laws are already in place for several red states.
If you are a Democrat, a woman will have a choice to get access to an abortion at an early enough point where she can make a decision and have a safe and legal option for the procedure. She will get proper healthcare.
People did not think Roe would ever be overturned. People thought a President who lost the vote would graciously concede and enable a peaceful transfer of power. Now there is no trust in the Republican Party.
People are naïve and ignorant if they never thought roe would get overturned. When one of the leading figures, and also a Supreme Court justice, states that it’s likely to happen, you should probably listen to her.
As mentioned earlier, I’ve heard about states banning abortion but every example I’ve heard, I’ve been able to find exceptions in their law. So it seems you’re exaggerating a bit.
Mississippi women faced second degree murder charges for having a stillbirth.
For pro-lifers, this is acceptable collateral to appease the oligarchs who convinced them to care about abortion.
Your hifalutin condescension notwithstanding, this anecdote is ridiculously irrelevant to the Roe-or-not debate. She had a stillbirth at 36 weeks! Practically no women think abortion should be legal couple weeks before the due date. The state may have unfairly suspected a poor black woman for killing her unborn child in this case, but that could well happen with or without Roe.
"Pro-lifers" whining "we just want acceptable restrictions on abortion" as they vote for and support hardline conservatives who will ban all abortions.
Hint: striking back at progressives by harming women and removing rights is not 'good' or 'moral' or 'just.' God judges you just as he judges all who go too far in their misplaced vengance.
For pro-lifers, this is acceptable collateral to appease the oligarchs who convinced them to care about abortion.
Your hifalutin condescension notwithstanding, this anecdote is ridiculously irrelevant to the Roe-or-not debate. She had a stillbirth at 36 weeks! Practically no women think abortion should be legal couple weeks before the due date. The state may have unfairly suspected a poor black woman for killing her unborn child in this case, but that could well happen with or without Roe.
Standard dismissal of the fact that abortion laws you support (directly or indirectly -- 'better than what progressives want') are directly harming poor and disenfranchised innocent women.
You may not wish this was the case, but this is what the pro-lifers have wrought. Now you need to own it (the next step in your moral maturation).
Your hifalutin condescension notwithstanding, this anecdote is ridiculously irrelevant to the Roe-or-not debate. She had a stillbirth at 36 weeks! Practically no women think abortion should be legal couple weeks before the due date. The state may have unfairly suspected a poor black woman for killing her unborn child in this case, but that could well happen with or without Roe.
Standard dismissal of the fact that abortion laws you support (directly or indirectly -- 'better than what progressives want') are directly harming poor and disenfranchised innocent women.
You may not wish this was the case, but this is what the pro-lifers have wrought. Now you need to own it (the next step in your moral maturation).
Sorry, your logic makes no sense to me. I doubt you can articulate what abortion laws I support.
I’m comfortable with Roe being overturned. This woman’s case is irrelevant to whether or not Roe stood. Are you seriously disputing that this case is irrelevant to Roe?
Standard dismissal of the fact that abortion laws you support (directly or indirectly -- 'better than what progressives want') are directly harming poor and disenfranchised innocent women.
You may not wish this was the case, but this is what the pro-lifers have wrought. Now you need to own it (the next step in your moral maturation).
Sorry, your logic makes no sense to me. I doubt you can articulate what abortion laws I support.
I’m comfortable with Roe being overturned. This woman’s case is irrelevant to whether or not Roe stood. Are you seriously disputing that this case is irrelevant to Roe?
The Roe overturning has emboldened hardline anti-abortion types (most of whom are unwitting/witting pawns). There will be more of these horrifying attacks on women, many of them experiencing painful tragedy. This is what ending Roe will do.
You think this is OK because, hey, some progressives supported abortion laws I didn't like. Well, you sure showed them. Who really cares about poor women in Mississippi?
In your eyes, losing a baby is just a natural happening in a woman's life, so throwing her in jail for it is, on the margin, not really that bad! How nice
You clearly don't know swing voters, or read polls. Abortion is waaaay down the list of vitally important things to address in the general voter's opinion.
The best Dems can hope for is a bump in turnout for their loyal base - but this will in no way resemble the mass mail covid voting scam they got away with in 2020, and it will probably be more than balanced out by motivated pro-lifers who will also turn out.
You have only yourselves to blame - instead of resolving the issue beyond a flimsy old court decision, you went whole hog on the extremism, matching the "begins at conception" stuff with late-term legality and federal funding. That's not how you win swing voters.
Also, turning around and talking about "bodily autonomy" after forcing experimental injections into millions of voters is a glaring irony the swing voters will see, even though you likely don't.
I beg to differ. My wife and I were lifelong dems who voted for trump in 2020. Never again. Especially after going through an ectopic pregnancy in a swing state.
You get only two votes. The most crippling cognitive bias in politics is overestimating your own vote's significance vs tens of millions.
With both major parties pushing insistent and contrary ideologies, but neither based on a sound analysis of privacy rights and good governance, voters will quickly get sick of the abortion issue and return their attention to their burning money.
In practical terms, most Dem voters are middle class or wealthier, and able to evade an abortion ban by crossing state lines. It doesn't affect them personally, rather it's a partisan, "savior" issue where they are heroically helping the poor or the ID's. And they always prefer helping the ID's rather than straight up helping the poor.
Sorry, your logic makes no sense to me. I doubt you can articulate what abortion laws I support.
I’m comfortable with Roe being overturned. This woman’s case is irrelevant to whether or not Roe stood. Are you seriously disputing that this case is irrelevant to Roe?
The Roe overturning has emboldened hardline anti-abortion types (most of whom are unwitting/witting pawns). There will be more of these horrifying attacks on women, many of them experiencing painful tragedy. This is what ending Roe will do.
You think this is OK because, hey, some progressives supported abortion laws I didn't like. Well, you sure showed them. Who really cares about poor women in Mississippi?
In your eyes, losing a baby is just a natural happening in a woman's life, so throwing her in jail for it is, on the margin, not really that bad! How nice
These accusations are all intellectually dishonest and vacuous. You have no idea of my views and are attributing your prejudices against people who are different from you to me, so I won’t engage on that front further.
What you have admitted is that you will use any pretext to construct the argument you like: overturning Roe is bad because something that could happen with or without Roe happened. Your intellectual inconsistency has been laid bare.
In your eyes, losing a baby is just a natural happening in a woman's life, so throwing her in jail for it is, on the margin, not really that bad! How nice
Harambe has just become gorilla-brained is what I can surmise. Attributing this nonsensical belief to anyone makes no sense, not to mention I remotely didn’t imply anything like that. When people lose an intellectual argument and get so angry that their brain stops functioning, it’s kinda funny to watch the train wreck.