Civil war wrote:
Patriotic Americans are armed and ready to destroy democrats in the civil war!!!!!
Bring it on, democrat trash!!!!
2nd amendment supporters are ready!!!
Civil war wrote:
Patriotic Americans are armed and ready to destroy democrats in the civil war!!!!!
Bring it on, democrat trash!!!!
2nd amendment supporters are ready!!!
Democrats are trash wrote:
Civil war wrote:
Patriotic Americans are armed and ready to destroy democrats in the civil war!!!!!
Bring it on, democrat trash!!!!
2nd amendment supporters are ready!!!
^ all talk. no action. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
jesseriley wrote:
We’re supposed to lay off 13-year-olds like trump’s boy, but if “randal” (real name, miscka) can put down the comic books & post in two languages, we’ll mock him just like you!
To be fair, first to the professor, and second to the Trumps:
1) She was making fun of Trump for naming the boy that, not making fun of the boy.
2) Trump and Melania did name the boy "Barron" which is not the EXACT same as "Baron"..."Baron" of course meaning among other things "a lord of the realm : noble". The meaning of "Barron" is mostly meant to be "Warrior".
Trump has more of a defense regarding naming his son "Barron" than he does about whether he committed impeachable offenses.
And, in case anyone didn't notice, stuff from the Mueller Report will reportedly be part of the articles of impeachment (and even if they don't include that, there's still all the other things that are being looked at that came out of the Mueller investigation for which he gets credit).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
agip wrote:
Laughing at moran Repubs - their conspiracies get shot down every damn day but they hang on to them. Because rubes gonna rube.
here, Barr's pet theory that Spanky's campaign was unfairly targeted by the IC is...destroyed by the guy he hired to look into it.
morans.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barrs-handpicked-prosecutor-tells-inspector-general-he-cant-back-right-wing-theory-that-russia-case-was-us-intelligence-setup/2019/12/04/17e084dc-16a9-11ea-9110-3b34ce1d92b1_story.html
CORRECT! That "Barr Tab" thing that Rigged was spewing was stupid. Crash and burn on that. Barr will be fortunate if he stays out of jail.
Flagpole wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
We’re supposed to lay off 13-year-olds like trump’s boy, but if “randal” (real name, miscka) can put down the comic books & post in two languages, we’ll mock him just like you!
To be fair, first to the professor, and second to the Trumps:
1) She was making fun of Trump for naming the boy that, not making fun of the boy.
2) Trump and Melania did name the boy "Barron" which is not the EXACT same as "Baron"..."Baron" of course meaning among other things "a lord of the realm : noble". The meaning of "Barron" is mostly meant to be "Warrior".
Trump has more of a defense regarding naming his son "Barron" than he does about whether he committed impeachable offenses.
And, in case anyone didn't notice, stuff from the Mueller Report will reportedly be part of the articles of impeachment (and even if they don't include that, there's still all the other things that are being looked at that came out of the Mueller investigation for which he gets credit).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I think what she said was only inappropriate to the extent she’s referring to a minor in a political environment. It’s also irrelevant, even if she made a great point - could have been done differently.
But that smug piece of $hit Glenn Quagmire looking Pizza Gaetz had to throw a tantrum and start yelling at her. And to think this fool holds a job representing people. I can’t stand Trump, but Gaetz is up there too.
YAWNNNNN wrote:
Civil war wrote:
You want civil war, democrat(s)????
Bring it on!!!!
Military, police and gun owners are on Trump’s side!!!!
Democrats will be rounded up and easily destroyed!!!!
Ahem, troll. You bring your civil war to us. We don't bring it to you. Best of luck trying to drive into the scary big cities where the dems lives. You won't be able to buy gas. You won't be able to buy food. The minute you see traffic you will crawl into a little ball, tuck your tail between you legs, and drive back to you safe house.
How do you know if a person is a Democrat or a Republican? The Republicans have their thumbs up their butts. Dumb dumbs.
Gordon Frank wrote:
How do you know if a person is a Democrat or a Republican? The Republicans have their thumbs up their butts. Dumb dumbs.
How do you know if a person is a Trumper or a Republican? The Trumpers alternate their thumbs between up their butts and mouths.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Those brave soldiers were adamant about more requesting more security and she just ignored them. She just scoffed at them. When the Benghazi attack went down she was sleeping the whole night. You really wanted this "person" as your president? Really?
You are lying again Lyin' Sally. There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton denied any security request from Benghazi. In fact, there is no evidence that she ever knew such requests existed.
You are also lying about her sleeping the whole night during the attack. In fact, the attack occurred in mid-afternoon Washington time. And we know she was awake until at least 11pm that night because we have records of an email she sent.
Of course, we know that people like Sally and Rigged don't care about the truth. But it's important to call them out once in awhile.
You are lying. Get your facts straight. This was at night. At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one-mile (1.6 km) away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty[2][4][5] and wounding ten others. Initial analysis by the CIA, repeated by top government officials, indicated that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest.[6] Subsequent investigations showed that the attack was premeditated – although rioters and looters not originally part of the group may have joined in after the attacks began.[7][8][9]
Trollminator wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
To be fair, first to the professor, and second to the Trumps:
1) She was making fun of Trump for naming the boy that, not making fun of the boy.
2) Trump and Melania did name the boy "Barron" which is not the EXACT same as "Baron"..."Baron" of course meaning among other things "a lord of the realm : noble". The meaning of "Barron" is mostly meant to be "Warrior".
Trump has more of a defense regarding naming his son "Barron" than he does about whether he committed impeachable offenses.
And, in case anyone didn't notice, stuff from the Mueller Report will reportedly be part of the articles of impeachment (and even if they don't include that, there's still all the other things that are being looked at that came out of the Mueller investigation for which he gets credit).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I think what she said was only inappropriate to the extent she’s referring to a minor in a political environment. It’s also irrelevant, even if she made a great point - could have been done differently.
But that smug piece of $hit Glenn Quagmire looking Pizza Gaetz had to throw a tantrum and start yelling at her. And to think this fool holds a job representing people. I can’t stand Trump, but Gaetz is up there too.
She should not have done it. She might actually personally hate Trump (likely does), but she should have just stuck to her very educated view on The Constitution. I wouldn't have mentioned the boy's name, but not everyone is as appropriate as I am.
Yes, Matt Gaetz is scum. He is a peddler of lies and misinformation, and he does it in the jerkiest of ways...because he's a jerk.
A little play with words about a name and the snowflakes are freaking out. I don’t get the hysteria. She did not attack the child. So very dramatic.
Patriotics wrote:
Patriotic Americans agree wrote:
Patriotic Americans will destroy democrats.
Patriotic: Normally, if someone is proud of their country, you say that they or their feelings are patriotic.
So, by hating people in this country you are not proud of it, and YOU ARE NOT a patriot. You are instead an unpatriotic Trumpanzee.
This guy posts frequently and yes he is filled with hate. Can you image going through life with that much hate? It must suck to be that guy.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
You are lying again Lyin' Sally. There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton denied any security request from Benghazi. In fact, there is no evidence that she ever knew such requests existed.
You are also lying about her sleeping the whole night during the attack. In fact, the attack occurred in mid-afternoon Washington time. And we know she was awake until at least 11pm that night because we have records of an email she sent.
Of course, we know that people like Sally and Rigged don't care about the truth. But it's important to call them out once in awhile.
You are lying. Get your facts straight. This was at night. At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one-mile (1.6 km) away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty[2][4][5] and wounding ten others. Initial analysis by the CIA, repeated by top government officials, indicated that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest.[6] Subsequent investigations showed that the attack was premeditated – although rioters and looters not originally part of the group may have joined in after the attacks began.[7][8][9]
Can you really be this stupid? What is it? Are you drug-addled? Were you dropped on your head as a kid? What?! The attack started at 9:40 PM. LOCAL TIME which was 3:40 PM in Washington, DC.
Don't just copy from a Wikipedia page and not only not give credit, but also not understand what it is you are reading.
That Hillary was asleep is a bogus thing Trump started. Debunked.
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/trump-on-clintons-3-a-m-call/You are to ASK QUESTIONS HERE ONLY. You are not authorized to give your idiotic opinions. You continue to show you know nothing about everything.
Flagpole wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I think what she said was only inappropriate to the extent she’s referring to a minor in a political environment. It’s also irrelevant, even if she made a great point - could have been done differently.
But that smug piece of $hit Glenn Quagmire looking Pizza Gaetz had to throw a tantrum and start yelling at her. And to think this fool holds a job representing people. I can’t stand Trump, but Gaetz is up there too.
She should not have done it. She might actually personally hate Trump (likely does), but she should have just stuck to her very educated view on The Constitution. I wouldn't have mentioned the boy's name, but not everyone is as appropriate as I am.
Yes, Matt Gaetz is scum. He is a peddler of lies and misinformation, and he does it in the jerkiest of ways...because he's a jerk.
What a joke. "her very educated view on the Constitution." What a joke. She and the other 2 clowns are radicals who despise the Constitution. They hate the right emboldened in the Constitution. She is a radical leftist like the other 2 nut jobs who appeared before the House. Only Turley has any measure of credibility. The others are more raidical than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
You are lying again Lyin' Sally. There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton denied any security request from Benghazi. In fact, there is no evidence that she ever knew such requests existed.
You are also lying about her sleeping the whole night during the attack. In fact, the attack occurred in mid-afternoon Washington time. And we know she was awake until at least 11pm that night because we have records of an email she sent.
Of course, we know that people like Sally and Rigged don't care about the truth. But it's important to call them out once in awhile.
You are lying. Get your facts straight. This was at night. At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one-mile (1.6 km) away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty[2][4][5] and wounding ten others. Initial analysis by the CIA, repeated by top government officials, indicated that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest.[6] Subsequent investigations showed that the attack was premeditated – although rioters and looters not originally part of the group may have joined in after the attacks began.[7][8][9]
BENGHAZI!!!!!
oh and.....
DAMN YOU OBAMA!!!!!!!
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You are lying. Get your facts straight. This was at night. At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one-mile (1.6 km) away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty[2][4][5] and wounding ten others. Initial analysis by the CIA, repeated by top government officials, indicated that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest.[6] Subsequent investigations showed that the attack was premeditated – although rioters and looters not originally part of the group may have joined in after the attacks began.[7][8][9]
Can you really be this stupid? What is it? Are you drug-addled? Were you dropped on your head as a kid? What?! The attack started at 9:40 PM. LOCAL TIME which was 3:40 PM in Washington, DC.
Don't just copy from a Wikipedia page and not only not give credit, but also not understand what it is you are reading.
That Hillary was asleep is a bogus thing Trump started. Debunked.
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/trump-on-clintons-3-a-m-call/You are to ASK QUESTIONS HERE ONLY. You are not authorized to give your idiotic opinions. You continue to show you know nothing about everything.
WHY SO MUCH ANGER, Flagpole? Can you write any post without name-calling? Because when you resort to name-calling on ever post it shows you are not witty enough to say anything funny or provocative. You need to rely on insults. You are BANNED!
Flagpole wrote:
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
You mean, he is still coming to nail a big Clinton donor? LOL!
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/04/politics/george-nader-key-mueller-witness-charged-with-funneling-contributions-to-clinton-campaign/index.htmlActually if the Trumps ignored the comment, Barron probably would not even have known his name was used and the subject would have been dropped.
But in order to score political points, Trumps made Trump the naming his kid Barron become a big story for all the papers. The kid has to hear about this every time he turns on the TV or looks at the news. He also knows all of his friends and teachers are talking about it.
The Trumps sadly turned their son into a well publicized victim to serve their political needs. This poor rich kid has very thoughtless parents. I feel sorry for him. (It also doesn't help when Trump refers to his son as his wife's son)
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
You are lying again Lyin' Sally. There is no evidence that Hillary Clinton denied any security request from Benghazi. In fact, there is no evidence that she ever knew such requests existed.
You are also lying about her sleeping the whole night during the attack. In fact, the attack occurred in mid-afternoon Washington time. And we know she was awake until at least 11pm that night because we have records of an email she sent.
Of course, we know that people like Sally and Rigged don't care about the truth. But it's important to call them out once in awhile.
You are lying. Get your facts straight. This was at night. At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one-mile (1.6 km) away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty[2][4][5] and wounding ten others. Initial analysis by the CIA, repeated by top government officials, indicated that the attack spontaneously arose from a protest.[6] Subsequent investigations showed that the attack was premeditated – although rioters and looters not originally part of the group may have joined in after the attacks began.[7][8][9]
Look it up. The attack started at approximately 3:40 p.m. Eastern Time. Every source I could find says that. Even Fox News says that. Hillary was not asleep. You are spreading lies.
Republicans: "Instead of wasting time on impeachment, Democrats should do their JOBS and focus on things like lower drug prices."
Democrats: "Ok, here's a bill that saves up to $1 trillion in total drug spending."
Republicans: "You lunatics thought we were serious? Have you learned nothing? We are NEVER serious. Quick, to the PAC mobile! Protect Big Pharma!"
https://mobile.twitter.com/TopherSpiro/status/1202701423529676800