Sally - if you have any respect or interest in the Constitution, you should be listening closely to these experts... will wait for you to argue against them
Sally - if you have any respect or interest in the Constitution, you should be listening closely to these experts... will wait for you to argue against them
I really would love nothing more than for any of the Rs in the committee to argue with these experts on live tv.
Trollminator wrote:
I really would love nothing more than for any of the Rs in the committee to argue with these experts on live tv.
These so called “experts” are hillary loving pieces of trash.
Trump will be easily re-elected!!!!
Meanwhile dems meet off the record to discuss...? No phones, no aides allowed. Seems like dissension in the ranks to move fast or wait toll subpoenas are honored?
jesseriley wrote:
Meanwhile dems meet off the record to discuss...? No phones, no aides allowed. Seems like dissension in the ranks to move fast or wait toll subpoenas are honored?
Think they just wanted to get on the same page and align talking points
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
And this of course again highlighting how much respect any other significant leader has for him...
https://twitter.com/i/status/1202008162997538817Trump should have told Trudeau he didn't recognize him without blackface on.
KAG2020
He certainly should have but he wasn’t thinking clear and once again missed a great opportunity.
Or maybe Trump was worried that Trudeau would fire back that he DID recognize Trump with his fake tan face on. That would have just caused Trump further embarrassment.
https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-analyst-somebody-else-150753946.htmlTrollminator wrote:
Sally - if you have any respect or interest in the Constitution, you should be listening closely to these experts... will wait for you to argue against them
I have great respect for the US Constitution. Make sure you listen to ALL of the experts. I don't plan on arguing against the very respected Jonathon Turley, who is no conservative. He is a constitutionalist. Here is what Turley will say ...
Turely will testify that removing President Trump over allegations of wrongdoing related to Ukraine would be a grave mistake.“If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president,”
Midwest and southern voters agree wrote:
hillary
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK SQUIRREL!!!
http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/125500/Donald-Trump-the-Squirrel-with-Lots-of-Nuts--125531.jpgMake sure to address the previous post, Trollminator, if you have any respect for the US Constitution.
Ciro wrote:
https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-analyst-somebody-else-150753946.html
Of course this is beyond ridiculous, but would be fun to make Nunes testify as to who used his phone then.
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Sally - if you have any respect or interest in the Constitution, you should be listening closely to these experts... will wait for you to argue against them
I have great respect for the US Constitution. Make sure you listen to ALL of the experts. I don't plan on arguing against the very respected Jonathon Turley, who is no conservative. He is a constitutionalist. Here is what Turley will say ...
Turely will testify that removing President Trump over allegations of wrongdoing related to Ukraine would be a grave mistake.“If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president,”
Ahhh but why does he take this position Sally... he just said it himself... because all witnesses have not been allowed to testify, so the country hasn't heard trump's side yet. Do you then agree Trump needs to let them testify?
Wow.
The Republican's witness just said Donald Trump is the devil.
A push-up bra & a drag-show-strength girdle, and he’d be a c-cup fo’ sho’!
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I have great respect for the US Constitution. Make sure you listen to ALL of the experts. I don't plan on arguing against the very respected Jonathon Turley, who is no conservative. He is a constitutionalist. Here is what Turley will say ...
Turely will testify that removing President Trump over allegations of wrongdoing related to Ukraine would be a grave mistake.“If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president,”
Ahhh but why does he take this position Sally... he just said it himself... because all witnesses have not been allowed to testify, so the country hasn't heard trump's side yet. Do you then agree Trump needs to let them testify?
I think certain aides should be allowed to testify. But not all. A president needs to have the ability to discussing things with his closest aides without them being called before Congress.
Executive privilege: exemption from legally enforced disclosure of communications within the executive branch of government when such disclosure would adversely affect the functions and decision-making processes of the executive branch.
Sally Vix wrote:
I don't plan on arguing against the very respected Jonathon Turley, who is no conservative. He is a constitutionalist.
Nope. You are wrong about Turley. He is a Trumper. He hated Obama, and supported the impeachment of Clinton. he also testified in groveling support of Bill Barr for Attorney General.
https://jonathanturley.org/2019/01/16/turley-testifies-in-barr-confirmation-hearing/Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I have great respect for the US Constitution. Make sure you listen to ALL of the experts. I don't plan on arguing against the very respected Jonathon Turley, who is no conservative. He is a constitutionalist. Here is what Turley will say ...
Turely will testify that removing President Trump over allegations of wrongdoing related to Ukraine would be a grave mistake.“If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president,”
Ahhh but why does he take this position Sally... he just said it himself... because all witnesses have not been allowed to testify, so the country hasn't heard trump's side yet. Do you then agree Trump needs to let them testify?
Turley is claiming that Trump should not be impeached unless he testifies. And Turley also supports Trump's claim he doesn't have to testify.
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Ahhh but why does he take this position Sally... he just said it himself... because all witnesses have not been allowed to testify, so the country hasn't heard trump's side yet. Do you then agree Trump needs to let them testify?
I think certain aides should be allowed to testify. But not all. A president needs to have the ability to discussing things with his closest aides without them being called before Congress.
Executive privilege: exemption from legally enforced disclosure of communications within the executive branch of government when such disclosure would adversely affect the functions and decision-making processes of the executive branch.
If those things he discusses are relevant to making a determination of whether he committed an impeachable offense then yes he should be testifying. He's not above the law.
