Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

undetermined wrote:

Sorry, old man. It does not work that way. Show us a law that says he CAN do that.

Every legal expert I have heard talk about this or read commenting about this has said as Commander-In-Chief, he has this authority.

So, there is no actual law. It is, as stated, executive overreach.

There is no law that says abuse of power is illegal.

Also, being unethical is not illegal.

Gym Jordan

undetermined wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Every legal expert I have heard talk about this or read commenting about this has said as Commander-In-Chief, he has this authority.

So, there is no actual law. It is, as stated, executive overreach.

Dude, you are not right about this.

Regarding what you said earlier:

"The president...can grant pardons after legal cases have run their course."

INCORRECT! Go read about how Ford Pardoned Nixon. He did it BEFORE any indictments. Blanket pardon..."a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes that he might have committed against the United States as president." Again, done before any charges were brought.

This is in effect what Trump has done here.

You are wrong about pardons and wrong about Trump's authority here. You might not like it, but he HAS that authority. Obama commuted Chelsea Manning's sentence. Presidents have the power to do stuff like this...pardon, before, during, or after a federal case, order a military leader to do anything he wants them to do shy of breaking a law.

You are not right about this...or about pardons either.

Flagpole, YOU ARE WRONG.

undetermined wrote:

Flagpole, YOU ARE WRONG.

Nope!

Yup. YOU ARE WRONG.

PS. You have turned into Hardloper.

Straightorward wrote:

Straightorward Man wrote:

Straightforward

Too late to fix your gibberish, Gammer Gurl. Learn the English language, please.

Straightforward

undetermined wrote:

Yup. YOU ARE WRONG.

Nope. I've given you reasons why you are wrong including the fact that you didn't know how pardons work.

So, are you saying they are just going to allow him to break the law and do nothing about it? Why should I believe what you say when all the legal experts say he has this authority?

You are not right about this. Typing in all caps doesn't make you right.

Drain the Swamp! wrote:

Who should be making the foreign policy? Unelected bureaucrats? Or the elected president?

The answer is that foreign policy is shared between the president and the congress. That's how the constitution lays it out.

Who should be implementing foreign policy? That's for the unelected bureaucrats. That's for the professionals like Fiona Hill who understand the details and know how to get things done.

Who should NOT be implementing foreign policy? That's clowns like Rudy Guliani who is a private citizen being paid by corrupt foreigners like Lev Parnas. That's clowns like Gordan Sondland who purchased his ambassadorship.

Uh oh!

Support for impeachment was higher before people saw the evidence. Now that everyone has seen the evidence, or lack thereof, support has plummeted. Pencil Neck's hearing was an epic disaster.

Clown show.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/democratic-congresswoman-brenda-lawrence-changes-mind-on-trump-impeachment/

Straightoward Man wrote:

[quote]Straightorward Man wrote:

Straightforward

Which you keep misspelling.

Flagpole wrote:

undetermined wrote:

Yup. YOU ARE WRONG.

Nope. I've given you reasons why you are wrong including the fact that you didn't know how pardons work.

So, are you saying they are just going to allow him to break the law and do nothing about it? Why should I believe what you say when all the legal experts say he has this authority?

You are not right about this. Typing in all caps doesn't make you right.

My reason: There is no law.

Your reason: Talking heads think it might be able to do it.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Uh oh!

Support for impeachment was higher before people saw the evidence.

It is HIGHER, and going UP.

"I'm curious why wasn't it done a long time ago? And also, I guess the answer to that is because now I'm president, we get things done."

Trump asking why the 100th anniversary of the passing 1920 Women's Suffrage Act did not happen before he became president.

Trump Maths.

Not a single Trumpette will callout the Orange one for his failure to know what a centennial is.

Straightforward ??? wrote:

Straightoward Man wrote:

[quote]Straightorward Man wrote:

Straightforward

Which you keep misspelling.

Straightforward

Centennial wrote:

"I'm curious why wasn't it done a long time ago? And also, I guess the answer to that is because now I'm president, we get things done."

Trump asking why the 100th anniversary of the passing 1920 Women's Suffrage Act did not happen before he became president.

Trump Maths.

Not a single Trumpette will callout the Orange one for his failure to know what a centennial is.

I am calling YOU out for saying it was the Women's Suffrage Act. It was the 19th Amendment! You want us to call out Trump when it is YOU who needs to go back and read about the women's suffrage movement and eventually the passage and ratification of the 19th Amendment!

Straightoward Man wrote:

Straighttorward ??? Gibberish.