Retired federal appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar put on the bench by President George H.W. Bush, is endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump, whose...
You seem to be bothered by the fact that the "government" (whatever that means) killed Ashley Babbitt.
And yet, you seem to support putting the guy who was the head of the government when she was killed back in office.
Weird.
A cop shot and killed the unarmed Ashley Babbitt who was a veteran.
The Garland Justice Dept pursued no action against the cop
And why the fk would they? She was a criminal trespasser attempting to put congress members' lives at risk. She was even warned multiple times to stop. We are talking about a Q anon nutbag with a violent past. Classic case of fkn around and finding out.
Wikipedia:
"In 2016, she faced criminal charges of reckless endangerment in Maryland after she allegedly repeatedly smashed her SUV into a vehicle being driven by a former girlfriend of Aaron Babbitt. Citing ongoing harassment, the victim obtained multiple judicial orders forbidding Ashli any contact with her."
The US military swears an oath to the Constitution. The service chiefs and other senior officers wouldn't have followed threw if Trump gave them orders to use force to stop the transfer after the election. Trump knew it had to be done by the extremist groups and whatever mob he could rile up to support them, so that is what he did.
Who knew every coup in history could have been avoided so easily by just declaring that it couldn't be done!
Why do you assume that the military would carry out Trump's wishes if asked? You claimed to have been in the military. If the president asked you to storm the capitol, as a soldier, would you have done it?
And why the fk would they? She was a criminal trespasser attempting to put congress members' lives at risk. She was even warned multiple times to stop. We are talking about a Q anon nutbag with a violent past. Classic case of fkn around and finding out.
Wikipedia:
"In 2016, she faced criminal charges of reckless endangerment in Maryland after she allegedly repeatedly smashed her SUV into a vehicle being driven by a former girlfriend of Aaron Babbitt. Citing ongoing harassment, the victim obtained multiple judicial orders forbidding Ashli any contact with her."
The US military swears an oath to the Constitution. The service chiefs and other senior officers wouldn't have followed threw if Trump gave them orders to use force to stop the transfer after the election. Trump knew it had to be done by the extremist groups and whatever mob he could rile up to support them, so that is what he did.
Who knew every coup in history could have been avoided so easily by just declaring that it couldn't be done!
I clearly stated the US military and US Constitution, so what previous coup in our history are you referring to?
It's like you responded just for the sake of responding without any real point .
Who knew every coup in history could have been avoided so easily by just declaring that it couldn't be done!
Why do you assume that the military would carry out Trump's wishes if asked? You claimed to have been in the military. If the president asked you to storm the capitol, as a soldier, would you have done it?
Because you're an idiot you think storming the Capitol is necessary.
He already had power.
If he was the evil dictator you idiots claim he is he wouldn't have allowed the election to go the way it did in the first place.
Are you honestly so stupid you think Putin really got 87% of the vote?
Why do you assume that the military would carry out Trump's wishes if asked? You claimed to have been in the military. If the president asked you to storm the capitol, as a soldier, would you have done it?
Because you're an idiot you think storming the Capitol is necessary.
He already had power.
If he was the evil dictator you idiots claim he is he wouldn't have allowed the election to go the way it did in the first place.
Are you honestly so stupid you think Putin really got 87% of the vote?
You didn't answer. Would you have done it? Yes or No
There's only two possible reasons a "conservative" would prefer a far left, anti-free speech, anti-cop, anti-border, anti-capitalist democrat over Trump.
1. They're lying about their conservatism.
2. They are war mongers who resent Trump's anti-war policy because it directly hurts their finances.
No, those are not the two reasons. There are MANY obvious and widely announced reasons that a conservative would vote against Trump, and you have failed to list even one of them. You know why you failed? I do. It's because you're an uninformed idiot and a MAG@ hysteric, and you look very like the guy on the new Vance .Cups.
Trump has undermined American democracy and the voting process by repeatedly lying about fraud, trying to get officials to change vote counts and refuse to ratify votes without evidence of fraud, filing frivolous lawsuits which were ALL denied for lack of evidence, appointing a USPS head to dismantle sorting machines to stop mail in votes and telling his supporters to vote in person, encouraging campaign and poll intimidation and violence, having his team break into voting machines, appointing fake electors, asking the VP to break the law regarding ratification, inciting a mob to break into and loot the U.S. Capital, then praising them as heros.
Unfortunately, "conservative" is no longer a description of the Republican Party. At least 75% of republicans will vote for Trump no matter what he says or does. They will not consider the above reasons. However, Republicans made gains in the House in 2020 but Trump lost. This shows that some voted Republican but did not vote Trump. He cannot win without 100% of Republicans because he will get 0% of Democrats and his share of undecideds and independents is shrinking.
Silicon Valley and Heritage Foundation bros go home devasteted.
That’s a strange grouping. Silicon Valley is firmly behind liberal candidates, while Heritage Foundation is firmly behind conservative candidates. Hard for me to envision a scenario where both would go home devastated. Care to enlighten us with what scenario that might be.
Still can't believe Trumpers are using "it wasn't a coup without the military" narrative. Especially as Trump says Biden stepping down is most certainly is a coup.
Biden was forced out against his will in 2024 be powers that be. That is a bloodless coup.
The US military swears an oath to the Constitution. The service chiefs and other senior officers wouldn't have followed threw if Trump gave them orders to use force to stop the transfer after the election. Trump knew it had to be done by the extremist groups and whatever mob he could rile up to support them, so that is what he did.
Who knew every coup in history could have been avoided so easily by just declaring that it couldn't be done!
Hey, just because your orange leader is inept and could not bring the US military along with him in his plans, it is no reason to disparage effective dictatorial leaders that coerced their military to break the law.
To borrow a phrase from a pathetic Trump lover. Defending Trump's inability to do anything effectively (Even overturning an election) is not the flex you think it is.
Silicon Valley and Heritage Foundation bros go home devasteted.
That’s a strange grouping. Silicon Valley is firmly behind liberal candidates, while Heritage Foundation is firmly behind conservative candidates. Hard for me to envision a scenario where both would go home devastated. Care to enlighten us with what scenario that might be.
whole lot of extremely rich and weird crypto guys behind trump and vance this time. interesting story.
Silicon Valley and Heritage Foundation bros go home devasteted.
That’s a strange grouping. Silicon Valley is firmly behind liberal candidates, while Heritage Foundation is firmly behind conservative candidates. Hard for me to envision a scenario where both would go home devastated. Care to enlighten us with what scenario that might be.
Living under a rock. Top VC investors (yes some used to support liberal policies) have openly backed Trump. Stop being lazy and look it up.
No, those are not the two reasons. There are MANY obvious and widely announced reasons that a conservative would vote against Trump, and you have failed to list even one of them. You know why you failed? I do. It's because you're an uninformed idiot and a MAG@ hysteric, and you look very like the guy on the new Vance .Cups.
Trump has undermined American democracy and the voting process by repeatedly lying about fraud, trying to get officials to change vote counts and refuse to ratify votes without evidence of fraud, filing frivolous lawsuits which were ALL denied for lack of evidence, appointing a USPS head to dismantle sorting machines to stop mail in votes and telling his supporters to vote in person, encouraging campaign and poll intimidation and violence, having his team break into voting machines, appointing fake electors, asking the VP to break the law regarding ratification, inciting a mob to break into and loot the U.S. Capital, then praising them as heros.
Unfortunately, "conservative" is no longer a description of the Republican Party. At least 75% of republicans will vote for Trump no matter what he says or does. They will not consider the above reasons. However, Republicans made gains in the House in 2020 but Trump lost. This shows that some voted Republican but did not vote Trump. He cannot win without 100% of Republicans because he will get 0% of Democrats and his share of undecideds and independents is shrinking.
Right.
The RussiaGate BS Hillary put out was fine.
But questioning an election in which late counted votes gave 3 key states to Biden after Trump had huge leads is undermining democracy.
Who knew every coup in history could have been avoided so easily by just declaring that it couldn't be done!
Hey, just because your orange leader is inept and could not bring the US military along with him in his plans, it is no reason to disparage effective dictatorial leaders that coerced their military to break the law.
To borrow a phrase from a pathetic Trump lover. Defending Trump's inability to do anything effectively (Even overturning an election) is not the flex you think it is.
The point is that you're too stupid to understand "dictators" do not lose elections.
1/6 was a riot. Only the dumbest people alive think it was a coup or an insurrection.
That’s a strange grouping. Silicon Valley is firmly behind liberal candidates, while Heritage Foundation is firmly behind conservative candidates. Hard for me to envision a scenario where both would go home devastated. Care to enlighten us with what scenario that might be.
whole lot of extremely rich and weird crypto guys behind trump and vance this time. interesting story.
you should look into it.
the election may not be what you think it is.
A bunch of those characters never believed in democracy to begin with. They live in another universe with their money. But like others, they see Trump as the ultimate useful idiot - a once in a lifetime opportunity. Biden played them hard too. We will later find out what kind of promises Trump made these folks.
Amazing to me that the establishment came up with this insurrection/coup narrative over the 1/6 protest and people fell for it
This narrative of a peaceful protest is only on right wing media and like the election lies that FOX admitted and settled for $780M, it is also a lie. The mob came with weapons they could get through metal detectors and used them on police to break into the Capital building.
