Gutless Lindsay. Typical Trump Repub.
https://twitter.com/commondefense/status/1197884538891972608
Gutless Lindsay. Typical Trump Repub.
https://twitter.com/commondefense/status/1197884538891972608
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) I am not tolerant of a criminal President and neither should you be.
2) I WILL call out those who support a criminal President. For the myriad of things Trump has done, from the serial lying, to the cozying up to murderous dictators, to the criminality, it is stupid for anyone to support him. Stupid people do stupid things. SOME of these stupid people are driven by their racism, because Trump is a racist, but since ALL racist people are stupid, we can use the umbrella of "stupid" to describe them all. I don't consider it mocking these people. Mocking is derisive, but it involves making fun of them. I'm beyond making fun of them, and that's not how I roll. I'm just flat out describing what they are. It is not possible to be a smart person and support a serial lying criminal President. Anyone still supporting Trump is stupid. There is no other possibility.
You are intolerant and pompous. Hopefully you are different in person. I can’t imagine you could be a successful businessman othersise.
I am intolerant of the things I mentioned. I agree with you that I am specifically intolerant of those things...those are things that any reasonable person should be intolerant of.
You find me pompous only because I don't hold the same view as you do. Your view is indefensible. Sorry, but it is. You adamantly support a serial lying criminal President. That is beyond the pale. I also hold the MAJORITY opinion in this case. Pompous people try to stand alone, above the masses. I proudly stand WITH the masses here.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Are you new to the english language? Was proved. Not was proven. Sheeesh!
^ proof that you’re an a$$hole. I fixed it so you can sleep better tonight.
Trollminator, Sally is indeed an a$$hole and has resorted to becoming grammar police on a message board while making mistakes of his own (I pointed this out in an earlier post). Unfortunately for Sally, he isn't right here either.
You can use "proved" or "proven" interchangeably the way you used it.
"For complex historical reasons, prove developed two past participles: proved and proven. Both are correct and can be used interchangeably: this hasn't been proved yet; this hasn't been proven yet. Proven is the more common form when used as an adjective before the noun it modifies: a proven talent (not a proved talent). Otherwise, the choice between proved and proven is not a matter of correctness, but usually of sound and rhythm—and often, consequently, a matter of familiarity, as in the legal idiom innocent until proven guilty."
So, Sally is both an a$$hole here and also just wrong.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/11/new-poll-suggests-democrats-impeachment-push-could-alienate-key-voters
By posting this link, it shows you think and likely behave in an unethical way. Schiff has already mentioned that some have suggested this impeachment process might not be beneficial to Democrats. He has supported it and pressed on anyway because it is the right thing to do. I have LONG said that we need to impeach Trump regardless of what it means to the Democrat Party, because it is correct and just to do so. THAT is the right attitude about this. Trump needs to be impeached because he has abused his power. That should not stand. This WILL be done and has to be done DESPITE what it might mean to Democrats in 2020 or at any time.
Stop being stupid. Stop being unethical. Shame on you.
Flagpole wrote:
Ruh ro:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/22/politics/nunes-vienna-trip-ukrainian-prosecutor-biden/index.html
From the linked article:
"In the Capitol on Nov. 14, as CNN began to ask a question about the trip to Vienna, Nunes interjected and said, "I don't talk to you in this lifetime or the next lifetime."
"At any time," Nunes added. "On any question."
Asked again on Thursday about his travel to Vienna and his interactions with Shokin and Parnas, Nunes gave a similar response.
"To be perfectly clear, I don't acknowledge any questions from you in this lifetime or the next lifetime," Nunes said while leaving the impeachment hearing. "I don't acknowledge any question from you ever.""
Sounds like an innocent man.
Michael Cohen becomes more prophetic every day.
A law suit has forced a trove of State Department documents that the Trump Admin refused to had over to Congress. And no wonder Trump attempted to conceal them.
Documents reviewed so far prove: A clear paper trail from Rudy Giuliani to the Oval Office to Secretary Pompeo to facilitate Giuliani’s smear campaign against a U.S. ambassador.
https://mobile.twitter.com/weareoversight/status/1198083929238052864
Documents are available to the public here:
Ghost has chemobrain wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
What is interesting about your comment is the thread’s intellectual leader (oxymoron, perhaps just moron) Flagpole is the epitome of intolerance. Essentially mocking tens of millions of people calling them stupid or racist. Of course his superior intellect has been such an accurate weathervane for the Trump Thread. ? Such behavior can never win over time. So mocking you and others that post similar nonsense is certainly fair game. Of course that view is coming from a sack of hammers.
?
Ok, I guess anything is “fair game” to you in political discourse. Good to know but I wonder if that’s because you have brain damage?
These articles explain your “condition” which makes you immune to facts, logic and critical thinking...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737214000462Or more specifically to your affliction ghost....
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24738942/What a sad delusion / demented old boomer you are....just like your orange hero.
Just a suggestion but I'd think about taking it easy on Igy. He's in full meltdown mode. I mean this in all seriousness - it is getting to the point where it is truly painful to watch Igy's disassembling over the last few days.
Number 5 wrote:
Ghost has chemobrain wrote:
Ok, I guess anything is “fair game” to you in political discourse. Good to know but I wonder if that’s because you have brain damage?
These articles explain your “condition” which makes you immune to facts, logic and critical thinking...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737214000462Or more specifically to your affliction ghost....
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/24738942/What a sad delusion / demented old boomer you are....just like your orange hero.
Just a suggestion but I'd think about taking it easy on Igy. He's in full meltdown mode. I mean this in all seriousness - it is getting to the point where it is truly painful to watch Igy's disassembling over the last few days.
He should just stop posting. If he's going to post stupid sh*t, we're going to tell him it's stupid sh*t.
That would be sweet, if that traitor Nunes finally gets what he deserves. A treasonous trip to Vienna on taxpayers’ dime.
Zoomer wrote:
Number 5 wrote:
Just a suggestion but I'd think about taking it easy on Igy. He's in full meltdown mode. I mean this in all seriousness - it is getting to the point where it is truly painful to watch Igy's disassembling over the last few days.
He should just stop posting. If he's going to post stupid sh*t, we're going to tell him it's stupid sh*t.
Humm. Not sure what to say. Not only did I have 4 1/2 months of chemotherapy, but I had a month of radiation therapy (not to the head however. ? My progress has been described by my doctors as “remarkable.” I will be running a Turkey Trot Relay this morning while most of you will waste time posting. The same race, hardest in my life, that I ran one month after radiation last year. I can assure you I still carry the same common sense that has characterized my 69 years. That is something I find lacking in this thread.
The Impeachment will not move the bottom line. 40% +/- 3% will never budge. They will continue to support the Republican candidate because: 1. It's better than letting a Democrat win and 2. They have convinced themselves that a quid pro quo for investigating a political rival is ok.
There is enough wiggle room because the evidence isn't there to say "Yes I'm only doing this for the election". It's the same issue with the Mueller Report. Trump speaks in such a way to avoid directly implicating himself or revealing his motive.
That being said....
Trump will lose: Iowa, NC, AZ, of course WI, MI, PA, OH....maybe FL, GA, NE....
Dem winner will have 300-350 electoral votes.
Alan
Your honesty is refreshing, but as a caregiver I find issues of aging are unnoticed by the sufferer. There are many, much younger than you, who get a new heart or new teeth or even cosmetic surgery; then they act like they are good as new. Time doesn’t stand still, it is vanity to think otherwise.
Common sense? This went out the window with trump’s candidacy, and in 3 1/2 years it’s gotten worse. Fat boy would assure us also, that he’s good as new. You delude yourself.
As for wasting time posting, discussion is the alternative to violence. Don’t worry, if it comes to violence, constitutional forces will deal with the few who lack common sense.
Welp, the ratings are in and the Schiff Show has flopped.
"The biggest swing is among Independents, who oppose impeachment now 49% to 34%, which is a reversal from October where they supported impeachment 48% to 39%."
"President Trump’s approval has increased in the last month with 48% approval and 47% disapproval, a bounce from 43% approval in the last Emerson National poll in October."
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I can assure you I still carry the same common sense that has characterized my 69 years. That is something I find lacking in this thread.
The first rule of the Dunning-Kruger club is you don’t know you’re a member of the Dunning-Kruger club. People miss that. --- David Dunning
real facts wrote:
Welp, the ratings are in and the Schiff Show has flopped.
"The biggest swing is among Independents, who oppose impeachment now 49% to 34%, which is a reversal from October where they supported impeachment 48% to 39%."
"President Trump’s approval has increased in the last month with 48% approval and 47% disapproval, a bounce from 43% approval in the last Emerson National poll in October."
The Emerson is an outlier. That poll is conducted by Utah college students who pick and choose who they "poll." In other words: their results are biased (i.e. the students are trolling).
https://www.aim.org/on-target-blog/poll-buyers-beware-emerson-college-polling-has-some-issues/https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2016/08/29/oh-new-poll-shows-ohio-tied-pennsylvania-michigan-tightening/https://t.co/YzypPdPCsXRunningart2004 wrote:
The Impeachment will not move the bottom line. 40% +/- 3% will never budge. They will continue to support the Republican candidate because: 1. It's better than letting a Democrat win and 2. They have convinced themselves that a quid pro quo for investigating a political rival is ok.
There is enough wiggle room because the evidence isn't there to say "Yes I'm only doing this for the election". It's the same issue with the Mueller Report. Trump speaks in such a way to avoid directly implicating himself or revealing his motive.
That being said....
Trump will lose: Iowa, NC, AZ, of course WI, MI, PA, OH....maybe FL, GA, NE....
Dem winner will have 300-350 electoral votes.
Alan
We can’t match that, but we’re trying. Crucifying trump before Christmas would be nice. Franklin can try to resurrect him as a false idol. His knowledge of the bible & politics is equally nonexistent.