Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/gv112219dAPR20191122064510.jpg?itok=6A1SgA5q

Back to posting cartoons from a Russia propaganda site I see.

?? Or ??

?

Now they’re sprinting through eminent domain to try and steal as much border land as possible for the wall, all with their trademark lack of transparency.

Wonder if Texas will grow some balls and stand up to trump?

jesseriley wrote:

Now they’re sprinting through eminent domain to try and steal as much border land as possible for the wall, all with their trademark lack of transparency.

Wonder if Texas will grow some balls and stand up to trump?

Nuts. To be fair, this has happened before (land seizure for parts of the border wall), BUT, of course, this is the kind of thing that most Conservatives in the past would not tolerate. Used to be don't take my guns or my land. Now, they stick to the guns thing but are butt up with a flower in it over the land issue. Fealty.

Probably. For those on the fence, though, if they think trump has been bad so far, wait till they see how much worse he can get as power & time run out, plus his health gets worse.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Flagpole is the epitome of intolerance. Essentially mocking tens of millions of people calling them stupid or racist.

1) I am not tolerant of a criminal President and neither should you be.

2) I WILL call out those who support a criminal President. For the myriad of things Trump has done, from the serial lying, to the cozying up to murderous dictators, to the criminality, it is stupid for anyone to support him. Stupid people do stupid things. SOME of these stupid people are driven by their racism, because Trump is a racist, but since ALL racist people are stupid, we can use the umbrella of "stupid" to describe them all. I don't consider it mocking these people. Mocking is derisive, but it involves making fun of them. I'm beyond making fun of them, and that's not how I roll. I'm just flat out describing what they are. It is not possible to be a smart person and support a serial lying criminal President. Anyone still supporting Trump is stupid. There is no other possibility.

I’ll respond because you started with a question. As usual you are too stupid to get it, we mock trump’s horrible appearance AND destroy him in substance every single day here. That he is a hideous human being on the outside is only fitting to his behavior.

Yawn - quid pro quo was proven.

X-Runner wrote:

John Bolton may not testify under oath but he could tweet or give interviews about what he knows about Trump's actions with Ukraine.

That would be just as damaging, if not more, than any official testimony.

The court of public opinion will be very important in the impeachment trial, where half of the jurors will also act as defense attorneys for the accused.

Bolton has actually been flying around giving paid speeches and almost teasing Dems because he’s been quite critical of trump. That his lawyer responded publicly that he would gladly testify if there were no legal hurdles with WH says a lot. Bolton with his direct no BS speak could do some serious damage.

Yeah, about that... wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/afb112019dAPR20191120044509.jpg?itok=cQc5-kOd

Dude, you're right! Schiff may know who the whistleblower is, and we don't (for certain)--that TOTALLY means that Donald Trump didn't ask (on camera) for Ukraine and China to hurt his political rival, and that he didn't commit FELONIES for which his co-conspirator is in prison!

TOTALLY!

Gym and Nunes admitted they need to understand the "affiliations" of the whistle blower. Yes, they are going to find something, anything to claim the whistle blower is a deep state plant... they would be washing away trump's actions completely to the millions of mouth breathers with that alone. Let them fry in agony.

Only the finest people

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/delete-your-account-traitor-goper-marsha-blackburn-slammed-for-ugly-smear-of-lt-col-vindman/

Bolton confirms that Trump had his personal Twitter account blocked.

"Since resigning as National Security Advisor, the White House refused to return access to my personal Twitter account," Bolton tweeted. "Out of fear of what I may say? To those who speculated I went into hiding, I'm sorry to disappoint!"

https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/22/politics/john-bolton-reemerges-twitter/index.html

Only his balls went into hiding, I guess. Grow some, and it’s not too late to testify.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The 3-year-long Mueller investigation found nothing on Trump. We should have stopped there. But you Libs despise Trump so much you made up this phony quid pro quo, not changed to extortion, then to bribery because the public doesn't care about it. Trump said there was no quid pro quo. Why not just let it go there and remove him from office by the ballot box? Just seems so silly to have these impeachment hearings when Adam Schiff is chronically lying and they are so biased in favor of the Democratic party. Why not have bipartisan hearings if the crimes are plain and clear?

Yawn - quid pro quo was proven.

Are you new to the english language? Was proved. Not was proven. Sheeesh!

one more dumb -ash republican conspiracy theory down the drain.

After every single one of their idiotic conspiracy theories goes down the drain, you'd think they'd stop believing them.

But no.

When you are dumb, you are dumb, and you keep doing dumb things.

No bias among FBI leadership during the 2016 election.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/justice-dept-watchdog-finds-political-bias-did-not-taint-top-officials-running-the-fbis-russia-probe-but-documents-other-errors/2019/11/22/4b2f51de-0d48-11ea-97ac-a7ccc8dd1ebc_story.html

jesseriley wrote:

Only his balls went into hiding, I guess. Grow some, and it’s not too late to testify.

Agreed, just endless drama and back stabbing in this administration. A damning reflection on the leader.

Somewhat unrelated but why are so many conservatives and the GOP ok with this piece of sh!t???

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

What is interesting about your comment is the thread’s intellectual leader (oxymoron, perhaps just moron) Flagpole is the epitome of intolerance.

Of course the President of the United States and a message board posters are like comparisons. What a complete idiot you are.

Your attempt to present yourself as some sort of reasonableness to this thread is failing despite what apparently is a smug look at the overall picture.

Also, can trump please stop undermining the military.

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-u-navy-secretary-backs-213139750.html

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The 3-year-long Mueller investigation found nothing on Trump. We should have stopped there. But you Libs despise Trump so much you made up this phony quid pro quo, not changed to extortion, then to bribery because the public doesn't care about it. Trump said there was no quid pro quo. Why not just let it go there and remove him from office by the ballot box? Just seems so silly to have these impeachment hearings when Adam Schiff is chronically lying and they are so biased in favor of the Democratic party. Why not have bipartisan hearings if the crimes are plain and clear?

Yawn - quid pro quo was proven.

Rs are going to pivot next week to 'ok quid pro quo but that's not impeachable.'

They have no choice - there is tons of evidence that the quid pro quo happened and zero that it did not.

I mean what could the Rs bring to the senate trial? There's no evidence against it. Even the chief of staff admits it happened.

So the Rs will just say 'that's spanky being spanky - he's a repeat sex offender and a thief and he lies to us, but he's our sociopath not yours, all presidents make mistakes and we acquit.'

Hilarious. Flagpole is calling people who support Trump insanely stupid. This is classic.

Flagpole, you used "myriad" in a way that makes you look VERY STUPID. I think you maybe actually DO work at the Cleveland Piggly Wiggly. You obviously never went to college.

Here is what "myriad"means ... innumerable. So your sentence amounts to this: For the innumerable of things Trump has done. Are you retarded or just very undeducted? Again, myriad means "innumerable." Please don't be the most stupid person here. To use in a sentence, try this .... "For the myriad things Trump has done." Again, myriad means "innumerable." You do NOT NEED "the" and you do not need "of." I really can't believe you don't know this. You are the biggest effing joke here. You never went to college. You have been working at Piggly Wiggly in Cleveland for the last 30 years. You are not intelligent. You are a dunce.