Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

The 3-year-long Mueller investigation found nothing on Trump. We should have stopped there. But you Libs despise Trump so much you made up this phony quid pro quo, not changed to extortion, then to bribery because the public doesn't care about it. Trump said there was no quid pro quo. Why not just let it go there and remove him from office by the ballot box? Just seems so silly to have these impeachment hearings when Adam Schiff is chronically lying and they are so biased in favor of the Democratic party. Why not have bipartisan hearings if the crimes are plain and clear?

This post by you exemplifies why you are outrageously stupid and also an a$$hole. The part that makes you an a$$hole is that you have made some of these comments before, and you have been given proper education on those things and yet you continue to spew the nonsense. I will give THE answers to your stupid questions. Read them and learn, and then post QUESTIONS ONLY after that. You are not authorized to make statements.

1) Not only did the Mueller investigation not find "nothing" on Trump (11 instances of Obstruction of Justice at a minimum), but that has NO BEARING on the current impeachment inquiry (other than if they decide to add Obstruction of Justice from that Mueller Report which they might). You don't stop there when Trump committed another crime AFTER the report was delivered. How can you possible be this stupid?

2) Trump said there was no quid pro quo. First of all, ok, we should take the word of the accused on that? But secondly, and most importantly, HE SAID THAT AFTER THE WHITE HOUSE GOT WORD THAT THERE WAS A WHISTLE BLOWER AND THAT THIS WAS AN ISSUE! How big of a fool are you?

3) Why not let it go and let it be settled at the ballot box? Well, that is completely ignoring the crime then, isn't it. That's what would happen IF HE DIDN'T commit a crime. Why should he be afforded that? Also, the crime he committed was to AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION. So, no.

4) What has Schiff lied about? BS. The White House and the State Department have been given ample opportunity to supply exculpatory evidence, but they refuse to release any documents that they have been subpoenaed to provide. Why do they do this? BECAUSE THEY ARE GUILTY.

5) These ARE bipartisan hearings. Completely fair. Democrats get to chair the hearings because that's the result of the 2018 elections. Elections have consequences, but you just don't like it when they don't favor you.

6) Finally, the evidence is clear. Trump broke the law. He committed Bribery. He has committed Obstruction (they will decide if of just Congress or also of Justice). He also committed FELONY campaign finance law violations LIVE ON TELEVISION.

There is no doubt he broke the law and has damaged our national security and our elections by so doing. The only question is if Republicans decide to do anything about it or not.

You really are dumb on a level I have never before encountered.

Sally Vix wrote:

I take my last post back. I don't want to bring your wife into this. I am sure she is a really great lady.

So, you will now condemn Trump for his childish attack on Kellyanne's husband. You are off the Trump train finally?

X-Runner wrote:

John Bolton

✔

@AmbJohnBolton

We have now liberated the Twitter account, previously suppressed unfairly in the aftermath of my resignation as National Security Advisor. More to come.....

11.8K

10:31 AM - Nov 22, 2019

in the crazy world we live in, Democrats have had for heroes none other than Jefferson Beauregard Sessions and now are pinning hopes on John 'wars are basically good and the only way to win' Bolton.

even classic right winger john mccain was a dem hero for a little.

Strange days, strange days.

Flagpole, on a Mount Rushmore of stupidity, do I deserve a place there? Any others here merit that distinction?

supressed account wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Yeah. I saw that earlier. I do wonder what that means.

It means that Twitter was directed to suppress his account. Likely by Trump Administration lawyers out of "security" concerns. Bolton is unhappy about his 1st amendments rights being taken away by some Trump lawyer.

Yeah, I am assuming that's what that means. He should just come testify and not wait to see if the courts ok it or not. Executive privilege doesn't extend to concealing criminal behavior. He'll be fine.

Rumor is that a book deal is causing Bolton to be a little dramatic.

Ultimately, a lot of rats will desert this sinking ship at the last minute, which is bad for fat boy as we move deeper into this mess.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole, on a Mount Rushmore of stupidity, do I deserve a place there? Any others here merit that distinction?

Questions only. Good for you!

In my experience, granted I am highly educated and run in circles where pretty much everyone I interact with is also highly educated, yes, you belong on a Mount Rushmore of stupidity. I will note that you brought this up. This isn't something I am just offering out of the blue.

Ghost of Igloi belongs on it also...again, since you asked. Rigged is also outrageously stupid like the two of you, but he clearly spins and knows that he is doing so, so I'm not sure I can put him on it. He's touching it (from the right side), but he's not actually on it. If we were ONLY talking about those in this thread, yes, but I have met some people who are dumber than him yet smarter than you and Iggy...again, since you asked.

agip wrote:

X-Runner wrote:

John Bolton

✔

@AmbJohnBolton

We have now liberated the Twitter account, previously suppressed unfairly in the aftermath of my resignation as National Security Advisor. More to come.....

11.8K

10:31 AM - Nov 22, 2019

in the crazy world we live in, Democrats have had for heroes none other than Jefferson Beauregard Sessions and now are pinning hopes on John 'wars are basically good and the only way to win' Bolton.

even classic right winger john mccain was a dem hero for a little.

Strange days, strange days.

We will see if we ever heard from John Bolton in a way that can affect Trump's presidency (meaning before the Senate trial is over) other than in this book he is supposedly writing.

I did never think in a million years though that John Bolton COULD be the one to really put the screws to Trump. I hope he comes forward and tells the truth.

Smarter than me? My IQ has been measured at 162 on one place and 165 at another. I would maybe put it at around 160 but I don't want to brag. I am a humble person.

Flagpole - I forgot to say - I think your IQ might be in the 180- 190-realm. You are quite impressive.

Bolton is more than a match for trump, but since they’re both bullies they don’t have any balls. Fortunately, it doesn’t take balls to pile on trump now.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole - I forgot to say - I think your IQ might be in the 180- 190-realm. You are quite impressive.

Your fake praise of me is neither humorous nor disarming.

I judge you on the posts that you make about which you are serious. You have shown an alarming ignorance of basic facts and an inability to either read anything or to read and then understand what you have read. You are much to present here for someone who knows so little.

"too present"

Wonder what @ghost thinks of this? wrote:

Hardcore Trump supporters must be okay with this.... wrote:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/new-york-times-slams-donald-trump-after-he-appears-mock-n470016

Basically, at this point if one supports Trump then one must be okay with mocking critics / opponents medical conditions, no?

This seems to be the case with ghost of igoli. He seems to be fine with attacking people in any way that serves his argument—which is what Trump does as well. For all we know Schiff could have hyperthyroidism leading to exophthalmoses and ghost seems okay—if that is the case—with mocking someone’s medical condition. He’s posted numerous times just recently mocking Schiff about his eyes.

?

Flagpole wrote:

WTF^n wrote:

OK, so I thought you might be able to give a retarded earthworm a run for its money. Based on this post ^, I'm going to have to retract that. You wouldn't stand a chance.

You are possibly the stupidest person who has ever lived. It is just unbelievable what a moron you are.

He's up there for sure. Sally and Rigged give him a good challenge there. When you have to resort to a post about Schiff's eyes, that means there's no defending the President. It's clear there is no reasonable defense of Trump. He did what he is accused of doing. The only question is whether Republicans will stand up and do the right thing or not.

?

Sally Vix wrote:

My IQ has been measured at 162 on one place and 165 at another. I would maybe put it at around 160 but I don't want to brag. I am a humble person.

You don't have an IQ anywhere near that. 160 is genius level, and you ain't no genius. Getting your IQ test done at IQs R Us and IQ and You doesn't show you anything, and anyone who gets their IQ test taken twice though, no matter where they do it, is incredibly insecure. Congrats on that.

It sure is educational for Ignorance to live-blog his descent into late-stage dementia.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/gv112219dAPR20191122064510.jpg?itok=6A1SgA5q

Back to posting cartoons from a Russia propaganda site I see.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/afb112019dAPR20191120044509.jpg?itok=cQc5-kOd

Dude, you're right! Schiff may know who the whistleblower is, and we don't (for certain)--that TOTALLY means that Donald Trump didn't ask (on camera) for Ukraine and China to hurt his political rival, and that he didn't commit FELONIES for which his co-conspirator is in prison!

TOTALLY!