Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Maybe we should relegate her to ONLY asking questions ;)

Trollminator wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Schiff DESTROYED Trump and the Republicans who denied reality during his summation. He was brilliant and amazingly effective. He linked Trump to attempted extortion, and trying to cover it up through obstruction of justice and witness intimidation.

The Republicans can not fight him on truth or logic, they have nothing but posts saying his eyes look weird. They are truly desperate and have been exposed.

Every elected Republican knows that Trump did it and that he is corrupt. Nunes, their leader is a very sad shell of a man.

Typical for tzees to mock his appearance, no surprise there. He has been spot on and convincing in his remarks. Can’t dispute anything he says.

You are castigating those who mock Schiff's appearance? You Libs here have been mocking Trump's appearance for 3 years. "The Orange one." Morbidly obese. Mocking his hair (which IS pretty bad). So many other criticisms of his appearance for 3 years. But we are not allowed (and I Have never said anything bad about his appearance) to mock Schiff's appearance. You guys are fine and dandy mocking Trump's appearance (and maybe it should be mocked) but imagine if Hillary had won and we had mocked her appearance for 3 years. You Libs would have been screaming from the highest mountaintop how inappropriate it was to mock a woman's appearance. It is always fine and dandy to make fun of men's appearances but women's appearances are off-limits. Decide if it is okay to mock one sex and then confirm that it is okay to mock the others sex. Or decide to mock neither. Be consistent.

And I think it’s a bit unfair for Hill to lecture ‘pubs about phony Ukrainian conspiracies.

Those conspiracies got them elected! It’s all they have! Without that, they’d actually have to do some work!

I could be on board with that. There is value though to seeing someone from the Administration lie constantly...lets us know what we're really dealing with. Also, don't want to give ammunition about fairness to the Trump Administration if you ban her. But, your point is well taken.

To be fair, libs have been mocking Trump's awful appearance AND his awful ethics.

His defenders are only going after Schiff's appearance.

'Cause he ran those hearings tight.

Kellyanne’s excuse is, I’m paid to lie about certain things!

I’m not lying about my marriage FOR FREE!

Two Sides wrote:

To be fair, libs have been mocking Trump's awful appearance AND his awful ethics.

His defenders are only going after Schiff's appearance.

'Cause he ran those hearings tight.

Libs don't care about fairness. They want one thing ... to oust Trump from office. They are ripping K. Conway when the biggest turd I have ever seen is her husband, George. This guy belongs in a cage. Why did she ever marry this buffoon?

1) Trump IS orange.

2) Trump IS morbidly obese.

3) Trump famously has horrible hair.

4) The difference is that we do that only in an ancillary way. We provide reams of detail about how horrible Trump is and why. The attacks on Schiff have ONLY been about his appearance.

5) I will mock the appearance of some women. I'll do it right now since you challenged me. Ivanka looks like she took the horse head her dad placed in someone's bed and took the teeth out of it for her own use. For the life of me I don't understand how anyone thinks she is attractive. Every time I look at her, I want to feed her a carrot. Melania looks like a gold-digging whore. Now, I did say that I wouldn't call her one anymore because some of you got too upset about that, but I never said I wouldn't say she LOOKS like one...because she does.

Yes, you are a liberal nut job. Of course you will mock women ... but ONLY conservative women. You will mock Trump but your panties get bunched when someone says a bad word about Schiff's appearance. Flagpole, you despise conservatives. Would you ever mock Hillary's appearances? Would you mock Shelia Jackson Lee's appearance who might be pushing 350? Did you ever mock the appearance of Maddie Albright? Did you ever mock the appearance the appearance of Barbara Mikulski? Of course not. You have so much hate towards conservative women that you revel in describing this in the worst terms that you know. Again, you relish mocking Trump's appearance but your pink panties get in a bunch if someone says that Adam Schiff might have eerie eyes or a slender neck. Be consistent ACROSS THE BOARD or you are a hypocrite.

Sally Vix wrote:

Two Sides wrote:

To be fair, libs have been mocking Trump's awful appearance AND his awful ethics.

His defenders are only going after Schiff's appearance.

'Cause he ran those hearings tight.

Libs don't care about fairness. They want one thing ... to oust Trump from office. They are ripping K. Conway when the biggest turd I have ever seen is her husband, George. This guy belongs in a cage. Why did she ever marry this buffoon?

Ah...I see Two Sides beat me to THE point. Nice job there Two Sides!

Sally, liberals don't want to oust "Trump". We want to oust a criminal from The White House. It's nothing personal. If all he was was the boorish sexist idiot that he is, none of us HERE would be supporting his ouster. It's his CRIMINAL behavior that makes us want to get rid of the CRIMINAL IN THE WHITE HOUSE. I did not like Bush's policies, but I never once even thought he deserved to be impeached and removed from office. On the other hand, I DID think Clinton should have been both impeached and removed.

George Conway belongs in a cage? For what? Speaking out against the President? What crime has he committed? Stop being such an idiot.

John Bolton

✔

@AmbJohnBolton

We have now liberated the Twitter account, previously suppressed unfairly in the aftermath of my resignation as National Security Advisor. More to come.....

11.8K

10:31 AM - Nov 22, 2019

The 3-year-long Mueller investigation found nothing on Trump. We should have stopped there. But you Libs despise Trump so much you made up this phony quid pro quo, not changed to extortion, then to bribery because the public doesn't care about it. Trump said there was no quid pro quo. Why not just let it go there and remove him from office by the ballot box? Just seems so silly to have these impeachment hearings when Adam Schiff is chronically lying and they are so biased in favor of the Democratic party. Why not have bipartisan hearings if the crimes are plain and clear?

John Bolton may not testify under oath but he could tweet or give interviews about what he knows about Trump's actions with Ukraine.

That would be just as damaging, if not more, than any official testimony.

The court of public opinion will be very important in the impeachment trial, where half of the jurors will also act as defense attorneys for the accused.

1) I am not a nutjob of any sort.

2) I already explained to you (and so did Two Sides) how our mocking of Trump is MUCH different than the mocking of Schiff has been on this thread. Read and comprehend.

3) I see no reason to mock Hillary's appearance. I think she's actually a good looking woman for a woman her age.

4) Why would I mock the appearance of Madeleine Albright (be respectful, it's "Madeleine") or Barbara Mikulski? Ivanka has a horse face and teeth. Melania looks like a gold-digging whore. I don't really have any other opinions of any current political women that I can think of other than Sarah Palin is insanely hot. I wouldn't just bring that up out of the blue, but you made this a topic of conversation.

Sally Vix wrote:

The 3-year-long Mueller investigation found nothing on Trump. We should have stopped there. But you Libs despise Trump so much you made up this phony quid pro quo, not changed to extortion, then to bribery because the public doesn't care about it. Trump said there was no quid pro quo. Why not just let it go there and remove him from office by the ballot box? Just seems so silly to have these impeachment hearings when Adam Schiff is chronically lying and they are so biased in favor of the Democratic party. Why not have bipartisan hearings if the crimes are plain and clear?

It was 2 years, not 3.

Trump should have stopped being criminal then, but he bribed Ukraine the very next day after Mueller's testimony.

Quid-pro-quo are Sondland's words and he is a Trump guy.

"Trump said there was no quid pro quo" - So, the accused saying he didn't is exculpatory evidence?

He is trying to influence and cheat at the election. Simply waiting for the election is like saying why not just beat Ben Johnson in the next race instead of disqualifying him for using steroids.

They had several non-partisan government officials testify about what they saw in Trump's direction of Ukraine affairs.

X-Runner wrote:

John Bolton

✔

@AmbJohnBolton

We have now liberated the Twitter account, previously suppressed unfairly in the aftermath of my resignation as National Security Advisor. More to come.....

11.8K

10:31 AM - Nov 22, 2019

Yeah. I saw that earlier. I do wonder what that means.

Trump can't control the orangeness of his hair. He can't control how goofy his hair looks. He CAN control his weight and needs to control that a bit better. You found Hillary hot? Was that when she was propped up that bullock? Or when she was in the southern church and pretending to speak in blacknese? You really found her hot? Your wife must be a real beauty.

I take my last post back. I don't want to bring your wife into this. I am sure she is a really great lady.