He's a federal judge. He has nothing to do with declarations of war or funding war.
Why not take the time to read the article that you responded to? It may save you from looking like a fool...again.
Being a judge does not preclude one from having political opinions dingus.
Interesting that you seem to be suggesting that Judge Luttig has "war mongering" political opinions, and yet you don't link to them, or even tell us what those opinions are.
More Republican "Warmongers" supporting Harris over Trump. Rod Chandler of Washington Tom Coleman of Missouri Dave Emery of Maine Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland Jim Greenwood of Pennslyvania John LeBoutillier of New York Susan Molinari of New York Jack Quinn of New York Denver Riggleman of Virginia Claudine Schneider of Rhode Island Christopher Shays of Connecticut Peter Smith of Vermont Alan Steelman of Texas David Trott of Michigan Joe Walsh of Illinois Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood Former U.S. Treasurer Rosario Marin Former GOP state chair and state Senator Chris Vance of Washington Reed Howard of Young Republicans for Harris Former Republican National Committee (RNC) delegate Rina Shah. Jennifer Horn, former New Hampshire Republican Party Chair
Who said this, admiring totalitarian violence against pro-democracy demonstrators?
“When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it…they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak...as being spit on by the rest of the world."
A) Pinochet
B) Kim of North Korea
C) Ayatollah Khomenei
D) Donald Trump, 45th President of the USA and nominee to regain the office
This post was edited 35 seconds after it was posted.
Who said this, admiring totalitarian violence against pro-democracy demonstrators?
“When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it…they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak...as being spit on by the rest of the world."
A) Pinochet
B) Kim of North Korea
C) Ayatollah Khomenei
D) Donald Trump, 45th President of the USA and nominee to regain the office
Being too stupid to understand context is like a hobby for you.
Nice confirmation of why people like Luttig are against Trump.
Pinochet persecuted leftists, socialists, and political critics, resulting in the executions of 1,200 to 3,200 people,[13] the internment of as many as 80,000 people, and the torture of tens of thousands.[14][15][16] According to the Chilean government, the number of executions and forced disappearances was at least 3,095.[17]
Who said this, admiring totalitarian violence against pro-democracy demonstrators?
“When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it…they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak...as being spit on by the rest of the world."
A) Pinochet
B) Kim of North Korea
C) Ayatollah Khomenei
D) Donald Trump, 45th President of the USA and nominee to regain the office
Being too stupid to understand context is like a hobby for you.
yeah because trump would never dream of using violence to achieve his political goals or recommend the army move into cities to shoot American civilians.
Being a judge does not preclude one from having political opinions dingus.
The guy you want to push out of the Republican party and call a RINO
- Worked in the Reagan Admin
- Clerked for Antonin Scalia
- Clerked for Chief Justice Warren Berger
- Was appointed by H. W. Bush
- Helped Souter and Clarence Thomas through the Supreme Court nomination process
I didn't call him a RINO.
Anyone who thinks the Democrat party let alone Kamala Harris is less damaging to the country than Donald Trump is a f*cking moron and not even remotely conservative.
The primary difference between Trump and the old GoP is that he does not support forever war for profit.
There's only two possible reasons a "conservative" would prefer a far left, anti-free speech, anti-cop, anti-border, anti-capitalist democrat over Trump.
1. They're lying about their conservatism.
2. They are war mongers who resent Trump's anti-war policy because it directly hurts their finances.
Who said this, admiring totalitarian violence against pro-democracy demonstrators?
“When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it…they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak...as being spit on by the rest of the world."
A) Pinochet
B) Kim of North Korea
C) Ayatollah Khomenei
D) Donald Trump, 45th President of the USA and nominee to regain the office
Yeppers... That was D for Donald Janice Trump
Also this:
Donald Trump had a bank account in China and took $7.5 million from them while he was president
Miss us with your smears at Walz for being a Chicom for having a wedding day in June.
Being too stupid to understand context is like a hobby for you.
yeah because trump would never dream of using violence to achieve his political goals or recommend the army move into cities to shoot American civilians.
Oh wait. He did those things.
He never used violence for political purposes. That's the left's thing.
Who said this, admiring totalitarian violence against pro-democracy demonstrators?
“When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it…they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak...as being spit on by the rest of the world."
A) Pinochet
B) Kim of North Korea
C) Ayatollah Khomenei
D) Donald Trump, 45th President of the USA and nominee to regain the office
Being too stupid to understand context is like a hobby for you.
What context makes praising China's military killing several thousands of it's own citizens, okay?
Please provide the context that makes that statement okay.
I'm not sure how much this stuff moves the needle. It will have no effect on the hard core Trump supporters, they'll dismiss him as a RINO or Never Trumper. But I wonder if middle of the road people, people who are truly undecided, might move to the Harris camp when they see this.
In the presidential election of 2024 there is only one political party and one candidate for the presidency that can claim the mantle of defender and protector of America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law,” Luttig wrote in a statement obtained exclusively by CNN. “As a result, I will unhesitatingly vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris.”
It matters quite a bit. Pointing out Trump's criminality and willingness to violate the Constitution will continue to be a factor for undecideds/swing/independents. Guys like Luttig are important for that. I hope they can get someone credible like Luttig to do a bit at the convention.
Things have changed in a very surprising way in the last month. It seems like it is Harris' election to lose now. Unfortunately, she makes unforced errors like announcing that demented, pointless and impossible economic plan from a few days ago. Or possibly worse, and what every never-Trumper like myself fears, she turns the DNC convention into a BLM woke-fest. Harris and the Dems need to resist all urges to act like woke idiots at the convention because it will destroy all gains. They shouldn't let anyone with BLM or George Floyd signs in the building or they'll just give Trump a thousand opportunities to remind undecideds that Harris actually promoted BLM riots and looting. Harris and the Dems can throw this away by being Harris and the Dems.
Anyone who thinks the Democrat party let alone Kamala Harris is less damaging to the country than Donald Trump is a f*cking moron and not even remotely conservative.
The primary difference between Trump and the old GoP is that he does not support forever war for profit.
There's only two possible reasons a "conservative" would prefer a far left, anti-free speech, anti-cop, anti-border, anti-capitalist democrat over Trump.
1. They're lying about their conservatism.
2. They are war mongers who resent Trump's anti-war policy because it directly hurts their finances.
A-Dolt
"I was just using my typical, unfounded and dishonest broad and sweeping generalities about everyone that I don't agree with".
yeah because trump would never dream of using violence to achieve his political goals or recommend the army move into cities to shoot American civilians.
Oh wait. He did those things.
He never used violence for political purposes. That's the left's thing.
It takes a very special breed of stupid to think the Commander in Chief of the most powerful military the world has ever seen would use unarmed fat guys with flags to overthrow the government he already controlled.
Let me see if I have this straight. Trump is now posting fake AI images falsely claiming Taylor Swift has endorsed him?
The man is so desperate to get some type of media spotlight back that he will do anything. These next 4 days are going to see Trump descend to new lows. He is like that Monkey throwing his feces at zoo attendees. Please look at me! Look at me!
He has posted before that Taylor Swift owes her success to him. Insane, but totally believable to clowns like Adolt, Gary and Sally.
The guy you want to push out of the Republican party and call a RINO
- Worked in the Reagan Admin
- Clerked for Antonin Scalia
- Clerked for Chief Justice Warren Berger
- Was appointed by H. W. Bush
- Helped Souter and Clarence Thomas through the Supreme Court nomination process
There's only two possible reasons a "conservative" would prefer a far left, anti-free speech, anti-cop, anti-border, anti-capitalist democrat over Trump.
1. They're lying about their conservatism.
2. They are war mongers who resent Trump's anti-war policy because it directly hurts their finances.
No, those are not the two reasons. There are MANY obvious and widely announced reasons that a conservative would vote against Trump, and you have failed to list even one of them. You know why you failed? I do. It's because you're an uninformed idiot and a MAG@ hysteric, and you look very like the guy on the new Vance Sperm Cups.
Also, you're a proven liar. You have no credibility. Not even your fellow MAG@s reading your posts believe a word you say. That's what happens when you get outed as a liar (Page 192).