So? The reporter offered no solution. He pressed where he could just like he's trained to do by his media funding. What's your big solution, old guy? WWIII?
Honestly, I feel for Hegseth a bit. He is in an un winnable position. He has to sit there and pretend to world leaders that there is going to be serious negotiations going on when everyone knows his Boss is negotiating for Putin. Not with Putin.
So all his explanations will be just like this
That's an interesting way to put it. Lefty media wants everyone to believe Trump is a "Putin Sympathizer" and "Hitler," which of course is just insane. They've spent a lot of money making people believe that. But really, the establishment is no longer in control. They have no control over how they want things to go and how they may profit off the situation, when Trump wants to end war, to save lives, etc., or whatever he is saying, which does not allow financial interest for the establishments. This is a radical idea given the amount of underground war and networks of corrupt persuasion in the world.
The left doesn't want to come out and say it, some do, but there is a lot of money to be made if we do go to war, which they'd like to be a part of, which they currently are apart of. The billions sent to Ukraine wasn't necessarily because of what was right, but because of alternate benefits and investments in doing so. Some would say immoral benefit. It is profitable to keep Russia as an adversary for many, many reasons, and Trump wants diplomacy, which many would argue is the moral high road, yet perhaps not financially the best for the U.S. There are ways to offset this, however by dealing internal production etc.
So really, Hegseth isn't thinking something as low level as your argument at all. He is brand new to the white house and discovering ACTUAL foreign policy for the first time and likely thinking, holy sh!t.
Oh boy. Go find where I called you dumb. I didn't. This should discredit you.
I asked if you were being rhetorical or not. I would like to know your reason for it since you brought it up.
I'm asking you to explain why Ukraine shouldn't be part of NATO. You've only deflected. You don't have an answer.
I'm guessing it's because Donny said so.
You cannot be serious, whether you are a crying lib or a MAGA Rep, it has been long known that Ukraine (which was even held at cash -sack gun point by Joe Biden to the tune of $1.0B , which he openly bragged about, are one of the most corrupt actors out ther)e. Biden told them point black, fire the Prosecutor or NO Money. The corruption on both sides of that transaction was mind blowing. You cannot debate that, or could you?
I'm asking you to explain why Ukraine shouldn't be part of NATO. You've only deflected. You don't have an answer.
I'm guessing it's because Donny said so.
You cannot be serious, whether you are a crying lib or a MAGA Rep, it has been long known that Ukraine (which was even held at cash -sack gun point by Joe Biden to the tune of $1.0B , which he openly bragged about, are one of the most corrupt actors out ther)e. Biden told them point black, fire the Prosecutor or NO Money. The corruption on both sides of that transaction was mind blowing. You cannot debate that, or could you?
Cool story bro.
Do you want to explain why Ukraine shouldn't be part of NATO?
I'm asking you to explain why Ukraine shouldn't be part of NATO. You've only deflected. You don't have an answer.
I'm guessing it's because Donny said so.
You cannot be serious, whether you are a crying lib or a MAGA Rep, it has been long known that Ukraine (which was even held at cash -sack gun point by Joe Biden to the tune of $1.0B , which he openly bragged about, are one of the most corrupt actors out ther)e. Biden told them point black, fire the Prosecutor or NO Money. The corruption on both sides of that transaction was mind blowing. You cannot debate that, or could you?
that m'aga morans still say this about biden tells us that the republic is doomed.
god be with ye, moran, and when you discover how you can learn actual true facts on the internet, come back to the reality based population.
Missed the point there, didn't ya. I expect the old running guy to MAKE a point. Instead, I see typical liberal media trying to grill Republicans as they are paid to do by our government.
What's your solution other than diplomacy, Mr. Genius?
Isn't the point that the Secretary of Defense has no idea how to negotiate with Putin?
You have no answer for that.
That's a weak point. If that's the point, I'd like to see that common reporter try, or you or anyone else. Hegseth made the point and it was simply, it is time for diplomacy. Regardless of politics or which administration got us into this mess without proper diplomacy, which by the way is the real issue if you want to point fingers, and that's it. Russia invaded prior to the Trump administration. You can't blame Trump or Hegseth for the advancement of Russian forces outside the limitations of their leadership. That advance occurred under Biden and they are dealing with it in a way that involves Zelenskyy and Putin, both. It's unfair and ridiculous to assume it is Hegseth's job to reclaim Ukraine's land by Russian advances made under Biden. Further, why are you pushing for such heavy policing in general? I posted earlier the establishment needs Russia to be an adversary because all of this is profitable. I'm not surprised Biden allowed and pushed for more chaos without ANY diplomacy at all. Now the establishment wants to paint the right as incompetent because they don't align with their agenda and it's simply not true.
While we are at it, did you want to talk about the oppression and corruption of Ukraine at all?
Honestly, I feel for Hegseth a bit. He is in an un winnable position. He has to sit there and pretend to world leaders that there is going to be serious negotiations going on when everyone knows his Boss is negotiating for Putin. Not with Putin.
So all his explanations will be just like this
That's an interesting way to put it. Lefty media wants everyone to believe Trump is a "Putin Sympathizer" and "Hitler," which of course is just insane. They've spent a lot of money making people believe that. But really, the establishment is no longer in control. They have no control over how they want things to go and how they may profit off the situation, when Trump wants to end war, to save lives, etc., or whatever he is saying, which does not allow financial interest for the establishments. This is a radical idea given the amount of underground war and networks of corrupt persuasion in the world.
The left doesn't want to come out and say it, some do, but there is a lot of money to be made if we do go to war, which they'd like to be a part of, which they currently are apart of. The billions sent to Ukraine wasn't necessarily because of what was right, but because of alternate benefits and investments in doing so. Some would say immoral benefit. It is profitable to keep Russia as an adversary for many, many reasons, and Trump wants diplomacy, which many would argue is the moral high road, yet perhaps not financially the best for the U.S. There are ways to offset this, however by dealing internal production etc.
So really, Hegseth isn't thinking something as low level as your argument at all. He is brand new to the white house and discovering ACTUAL foreign policy for the first time and likely thinking, holy sh!t.
TL Dr
Maybe it would have been smarter not to hire a Fox News weekend host with a drinky problem.
I'm asking you to explain why Ukraine shouldn't be part of NATO. You've only deflected. You don't have an answer.
I'm guessing it's because Donny said so.
You cannot be serious, whether you are a crying lib or a MAGA Rep, it has been long known that Ukraine (which was even held at cash -sack gun point by Joe Biden to the tune of $1.0B , which he openly bragged about, are one of the most corrupt actors out ther)e. Biden told them point black, fire the Prosecutor or NO Money. The corruption on both sides of that transaction was mind blowing. You cannot debate that, or could you?
This guy, agip and oldrunning guy is like talking to a brick wall.
HHS handed out the high sum to a host of nonprofits, effectively serving as a “giant magnet” for those crossing the US border and claiming asylum, auditors from the taxpayer watchdog Op…
Isn't the point that the Secretary of Defense has no idea how to negotiate with Putin?
You have no answer for that.
That's a weak point. If that's the point, I'd like to see that common reporter try, or you or anyone else. Hegseth made the point and it was simply, it is time for diplomacy. Regardless of politics or which administration got us into this mess without proper diplomacy, which by the way is the real issue if you want to point fingers, and that's it. Russia invaded prior to the Trump administration. You can't blame Trump or Hegseth for the advancement of Russian forces outside the limitations of their leadership. That advance occurred under Biden and they are dealing with it in a way that involves Zelenskyy and Putin, both. It's unfair and ridiculous to assume it is Hegseth's job to reclaim Ukraine's land by Russian advances made under Biden. Further, why are you pushing for such heavy policing in general? I posted earlier the establishment needs Russia to be an adversary because all of this is profitable. I'm not surprised Biden allowed and pushed for more chaos without ANY diplomacy at all. Now the establishment wants to paint the right as incompetent because they don't align with their agenda and it's simply not true.
While we are at it, did you want to talk about the oppression and corruption of Ukraine at all?
More deflection. Either provide an answer or shut the hell up. I'm not interested in helping you jerk off.
That's an interesting way to put it. Lefty media wants everyone to believe Trump is a "Putin Sympathizer" and "Hitler," which of course is just insane. They've spent a lot of money making people believe that. But really, the establishment is no longer in control. They have no control over how they want things to go and how they may profit off the situation, when Trump wants to end war, to save lives, etc., or whatever he is saying, which does not allow financial interest for the establishments. This is a radical idea given the amount of underground war and networks of corrupt persuasion in the world.
The left doesn't want to come out and say it, some do, but there is a lot of money to be made if we do go to war, which they'd like to be a part of, which they currently are apart of. The billions sent to Ukraine wasn't necessarily because of what was right, but because of alternate benefits and investments in doing so. Some would say immoral benefit. It is profitable to keep Russia as an adversary for many, many reasons, and Trump wants diplomacy, which many would argue is the moral high road, yet perhaps not financially the best for the U.S. There are ways to offset this, however by dealing internal production etc.
So really, Hegseth isn't thinking something as low level as your argument at all. He is brand new to the white house and discovering ACTUAL foreign policy for the first time and likely thinking, holy sh!t.
TL Dr
Maybe it would have been smarter not to hire a Fox News weekend host with a drinky problem.
You cannot be serious, whether you are a crying lib or a MAGA Rep, it has been long known that Ukraine (which was even held at cash -sack gun point by Joe Biden to the tune of $1.0B , which he openly bragged about, are one of the most corrupt actors out ther)e. Biden told them point black, fire the Prosecutor or NO Money. The corruption on both sides of that transaction was mind blowing. You cannot debate that, or could you?
This guy, agip and oldrunning guy is like talking to a brick wall.
I’ve said it several times and I’ll repeat it. The educated, intelligent libs left this thread after they realized how good of a job Trump was doing. What this thread is left with are the poorly educated, less intelligent libs. This is proven to be correct every day.
