Try to articulate your platform without mentioning President Trump.
Democrats are:
For healthcare for all
Against corruption and have ousted many of their own for corruption.
For law and order.
For renewable energy which makes the US self sufficient, lowers prices, and increases national security.
For education.
For the IRS collecting taxes due.
For freedom of speech, even if they don't like the speech.
For supporting allies and them helping the US when needed.
Against wars without clear objectives or exit strategies.
For having experts in every discipline of government who have a say in policy.
the absolutely wild thing is that a Republican will say this and think it's an indictment of the Republican Party, not an explanation of the Dems. They'l see it as criticism of the GOP, not a description of Dem policy.
Think about that. It means they understand the GOP is for none of that.
No no no, 1776 didn't vote for kamala. He voted against trump. Big difference. kamala, LOL, had zero accomplishments, when off prompter said some rambling crazy Shizz, she's a big Dummy, and of course she wouldn't or wasn't allowed to go on the joe rogan podcast despite trump and vance both doing 3 hours each. We could've learned a lot about her and she would've done better in the election most likely, instead we got very little from kamala other than what her handler's told her to say. Now you may say it's just a podcast but someone with as big of a job as President should be able to sit down with someone and have a conversation for a few hours. Without a teleprompter, without editing. I will remind you she did do a podcast close to the election and the podcaster didn't air it, in his words "she looked dumb." That was after the election of course, this podcaster tried to swing the election by not reporting the facts. So, we had that incident, no primary, hiding biden's ailments, and going after the republican candidate by any means necessary. trump is a threat to democracy? Yeah, sure.
The crime syndicate, (D) is up to their old tricks again. Fraud!
JUST IN: Newly elected 24-year-old Democrat-endorsed mayor of Belleville, NJ Frank Vélez, reportedly had his car repossessed pic.twitter.com/wAGdImH1MP
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 California Governor Gavin Newsom's former Chief of Staff Dana Williamson pleads guilty to corruption and tax charges. pic.twitter.com/sCasNEIRvi
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Gavin Newsom is facing calls to resign his office because his elderly parole program is about to DUMP a convicted CHILD abuser into the community
Sacramento Sheriff: "How is it OK to LET HIM OUT?!"
So far we've learned: 1) Trump doesn't support Taiwan 2) Trump is letting 500k Chinese students into the USA 3) Trump is letting the Chinese government buy more U.S. farmland 4) Like a dumbazz Trump is celebrating soybean sales to China as if we didn't already sell them soybeans
Big news here. Yes, let's expose these "parents." Something tells me it will be mostly women who get in trouble. Shame.........
BREAKING: U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro announces a major crackdown on parents who let their children take part in teen takeovers that have been causing chaos throughout Washington, D.C.
Pirro vows to prosecute parents who fail to supervise their children, threatening the adults… pic.twitter.com/roulIfKLzi
Convict them all if there is a crime. Very few democrats would argue with that. But you probably don't want to go down the road of claiming corruption is only democrats given the number of obvious foreign conflicts of interest and convictions of Trump's insiders.
Kushner - $2B "investment" and an unregistered middle east negotiator and advisor for the admin. Witkoff too.
Trump has lifted sanctions on Vietnam and Syria for personal real estate business deals.
Hopefully the original judge comes back and hands down an even longer sentence on account of Tina Peters being a disgusting piece of garbage that deserves to die alone and broke in a tiny jail cell.
Here is a real news source and a quote to help you understand the ruling.
"Judges on the Colorado Court of Appeals upheld her conviction in a 74-page ruling that rejected the notion that Trump has authority to pardon her state crimes. But they said a lower court judge should not have considered Peters’ continued promotion of election fraud conspiracies when he sentenced her in 2024."
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.