Conundrum wrote:
Sounds nice wrote:
Sally or Rigged? And, what is your evidence?
I think Rigged might be gone. Whether its just a temporary ban, I don't know.
Nope! Still here.
KAG2020
Conundrum wrote:
Sounds nice wrote:
Sally or Rigged? And, what is your evidence?
I think Rigged might be gone. Whether its just a temporary ban, I don't know.
Nope! Still here.
KAG2020
over the edge wrote:
I will add that Rigged was the worst offender not getting a clue on this thread. Sally and Ghost are at a similar blind support of Trump level but their posts are anywhere close to offensive as Rigged's posts. Sally seemed to feed off Rigged. Ghost seems to mostly immune to the nonsense Rigged posted.
What I find really interesting is that, as someone noted, the number of odd unregistered name posts in support of Trump have decreased dramatically. One's like relying "Agree" to bump a post like "Democrats are pieces of trash" or "Midwest voters agree". The odds are that most of the posts were made by Rigged.
Nope, not me. Silly libs.
KAG2020
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Rigged for Who TF Knows wrote:
Didn't Rigged post the supposed identity of the whistle blower on here? That could put LRC in some serious legal jeopardy if true. Perhaps he has actually been banned.
You guys are overestimating the power of Letsrun. Maybe we can drive marathon cheaters to suicide, but the whistleblower's name has been disclosed in numerous places. Even Rand Paul identified him.
Correct! Finally a lib with some common sense here.
KAG2020
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.
If it turns out he's the love child of Hillary and Obama, what does that have to do with the evidence against Trump?
I would agree that the evidence against Trump should stand on its own but if the House intel chair has been colluding for months with one of the integral figures in the impeachment of an American president, and Schiff has not disclosed that, that is something that seriously needs to be looked in to.
Looks like Barr’s visit with Murdoch was a waste of time. Trumpsters lose again.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/fox-kennedy-trump-big-dumb-baby-yovanovitch-161206423.html
https://news.yahoo.com/bret-baier-hearing-turned-dime-155821101.html
If the ‘pubs can prove all the witnesses are never-trumpers...it would only show they’re of sound mind.
Trigged, prove it’s really you & start spewing the whistleblower’s name. The real trigged kept doing it over & over until he was in full meltdown.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.
If it turns out he's the love child of Hillary and Obama, what does that have to do with the evidence against Trump?
Nothing whatever, of course.
To use someone else's metaphor, the whistleblower was just the person who called 911. The offenses themselves were admitted by the President, his lawyer, and his chief of staff; verified by the WH's own transcript; and *repeated* on air by the President (with another foreign country added, yet). Recent corroboration by other witnesses is (perhaps) interesting but unnecessary.
When you have solid evidence of an offense, the identity of the person who alerted the authorities to the offense is genuinely irrelevant.
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.
Everyone in Congress knows who he is. Why is Adam Schiff so vehemently opposed to having him appear before Congress. What is he afraid of? The whistleblower is an integral part of this impeachment hearing. Allow him to testify before in Congress in private. Why not???
The whistle blower's role was to bring attention to a situation. Attention is now on said situation. The whistle blower's job is done.
You are an imbecile.
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Do you have any evidence for this or are you just another nut job?
I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.
You can't just allege something and expect the government to take action.
Real Americans require evidence first.
Obvi wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Everyone in Congress knows who he is. Why is Adam Schiff so vehemently opposed to having him appear before Congress. What is he afraid of? The whistleblower is an integral part of this impeachment hearing. Allow him to testify before in Congress in private. Why not???
The whistle blower's role was to bring attention to a situation. Attention is now on said situation. The whistle blower's job is done.
You are an imbecile.
More insults. Sheesh. Are you 12?
Excellent defense. Treason, sure! Bribery, only $400 million! But dems not liking fat boy? They are the real criminals!
You could hire OJ, don’t think he’s looking for the real killers anymore.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
I think Rigged might be gone. Whether its just a temporary ban, I don't know.
Nope! Still here.
KAG2020
Rigged, I found it funny but the Libs/Dems here would mourning your absence. They thought you had been banned and were a bit down today. I am sure they will give you a big group hug knowing you are back and back for the duration!
Eric Ciaamella has been outed by the media long before I ever did:
KAG2020
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
If it turns out he's the love child of Hillary and Obama, what does that have to do with the evidence against Trump?
I would agree that the evidence against Trump should stand on its own but if the House intel chair has been colluding for months with one of the integral figures in the impeachment of an American president, and Schiff has not disclosed that, that is something that seriously needs to be looked in to.
I would agree that the evidence against Trump should stand on its own but if Sally has been beating his wife for months and his wife has been having an affair with one of the integral figures in the impeachment of an American president, and Sally has not disclosed that, that is something that seriously needs to be looked into.
Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. Sally also is alleged to be the love child of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.
Rigged - I forget the exact quote of Mark Twain, but the rumors of your death/banishment were exagerated.
The impeachment hearings summed up:
Overhearing someone else’s phone conversation isn’t first hand knowledge. It’s still second hand hearsay.
Clown show.
KAG2020
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
I would agree that the evidence against Trump should stand on its own but if the House intel chair has been colluding for months with one of the integral figures in the impeachment of an American president, and Schiff has not disclosed that, that is something that seriously needs to be looked in to.
I would agree that the evidence against Trump should stand on its own but if Sally has been beating his wife for months and his wife has been having an affair with one of the integral figures in the impeachment of an American president, and Sally has not disclosed that, that is something that seriously needs to be looked into.
Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. Sally also is alleged to be the love child of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.
Very very weak, FAt Hurts. My stepson can do much better than that. Is that your best? Because if it is, it a'int very good.
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Rigged - I forget the exact quote of Mark Twain, but the rumors of your death/banishment were exagerated.
Wow. I took a day off and everybody celebrates my nonexistent ban. Remember,
America first!
KAG2020
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The impeachment hearings summed up:
Overhearing someone else’s phone conversation isn’t first hand knowledge. It’s still second hand hearsay.
Clown show.
KAG2020
This impeachment hearing is making the (zzzzzzzz) Mueller report look like gangbusters. This impeachment hearing is the biggest flop since Ishtar.
Budget official flips! Testifies on a rare Saturday session, in private, over Ukraine money being held up!