Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Pookie Washington wrote:

real facts wrote:

At least this approach pretends to have a legal basis. It is BS though.

No one will be charged much less convicted under this.

The reason they are hiding the whistleblower is because it is known he colluded with Schiff on his report and then didn't acknowledge that fact to the inspector general.

And the Republicans would ask him about this under oath.

They would also expose his role in the Russia hoax.

Let’s say the whistleblower is a far left die hard Dem who hates Trump. What difference does that make? Everything he said was true. What is the purpose of outing him or her?

Makes for good propaganda to effectively influence the brain dead.

But you already knew that.

Midwest and southern voters agree wrote:

Any attempt to remove Trump will be met with immediate whining by white insecure 300 pound mouth breathers who would probably shoot themselves in the foot when trying to raise their firearms.

Trigged Facts, don’t have another meltdown & start spewing the whistleblower’s name. That’s what got you banned!

Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:

over the top wrote:

It is ILLEGAL to out or threaten a whistleblower. That others have mentioned an "alleged name" does not mean everyone can gang up and hope to get the person beaten up or murdered. Rand Paul is an idiot, and deserves to be booted from Congress for failing to uphold the law as he swore on a Bible he would do when he was seated.

https://cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Inspector-General/Whistleblower-Protection-Act-WPA

It is not so simple to say that it is illegal to "out" a whistleblower.

IT IS illegal for the Inspector General or a member of his or her staff to out the whistleblower. Members of Congress are immune from anything they say on the floor of Congress.

Whether Rigged or another individual could face criminal charges is a bit unclear. Please read this:

https://keyt.com/news/politics/2019/11/08/is-it-illegal-to-out-the-whistleblower/

Shut up troll

jesseriley wrote:

Rand Paul also is innocent by reason of mental defect.

Prepare yourself for the flood of “immunity” rationales by ‘pubs, for every possible crime, by anyone who can even spell trump (plus some who can’t).

Rand Paul is a one dimensional bumbling pube headed fool

jesseriley wrote:

Not ID’ing the whistleblower is common sense, which you obviously lack. But it’s obviously retaliation, dumb@ss. And it could lead to the murder of the whistleblower, another crime that isn’t included in the law.

Murder is not a crime if it is committed by the sitting president.

Sheet for brains wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

Rand Paul also is innocent by reason of mental defect.

Prepare yourself for the flood of “immunity” rationales by ‘pubs, for every possible crime, by anyone who can even spell trump (plus some who can’t).

Rand Paul is a one dimensional bumbling pube headed fool

Rand Paul is proof intelligent design does not exist.

Boogie Down Bronx wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

Holmes deposition is devastating to trump & Sondland.

Fat boy was screaming so loud on an unencrypted phone that Holmes heard everything, Sondland having to hold it away from his ear!

Donny “doesn’t give a $hit about Ukraine,” Sondland told Holmes.

So do y’all think Sondland will plead the 5th? I think it’s a good possibility. His a$$ is in trouble. They should give him immunity and let him tell the truth THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

I think it would be unwise to take the 5th. There were at least three other people at the table and at least two apparently heard the phone call.

Sondland is busted.

The best way forward is to come clean and tell the whole truth. If he tells everything he knows to congress without delay then he might avoid prison time.

Da Truf wrote:

Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:

It is not so simple to say that it is illegal to "out" a whistleblower.

IT IS illegal for the Inspector General or a member of his or her staff to out the whistleblower. Members of Congress are immune from anything they say on the floor of Congress.

Whether Rigged or another individual could face criminal charges is a bit unclear. Please read this:

https://keyt.com/news/politics/2019/11/08/is-it-illegal-to-out-the-whistleblower/

Shut up troll

Why not try a novel approach ... why not try "contributing" instead of just spewing insults. I am sure you are a swell person but just try contributing. Insults are not needed. They are for the lazy people. Witty people who have nice and often humorous retorts usually win the women. The ones who spew insults are usually at home alone on weekend nights.

Conundrum wrote:

Sounds nice wrote:

Sally or Rigged? And, what is your evidence?

I think Rigged might be gone. Whether its just a temporary ban, I don't know.

Rigged had his $hit beat in one too many times

real facts wrote:

The reason they are hiding the whistleblower is because it is known he colluded with Schiff on his report and then didn't acknowledge that fact to the inspector general.

Do you have any evidence for this or are you just another nut job?

X-Runner wrote:

41 is well above 40? (I assume you were being sarcastic)

He has never approached 50%. That’s pretty bad.

With low unemployment and another stock market barrier broken, he should be doing real well.

And he would be doing well if he only would shut his mouth, stop insulting people and turn off his Twitter account.

Actually amazing that he could easily get re elected despite the criminality just by not tweeting anymore

over the edge wrote:

Rigged for Who TF Knows wrote:

Didn't Rigged post the supposed identity of the whistle blower on here? That could put LRC in some serious legal jeopardy if true. Perhaps he has actually been banned.

Rigged went way too far. He keep posting the alleged name. Correct or not made no difference to him. Sending a message by endangering a person's life was the goal; to discourage others from following the law.

But why Rigged likely got banned was that after noticing his posts with the name were being deleted he resorted to posting the name via links. That made it extremely hard for the moderators to eliminate those threads.

Anyway, there was a mass purging of posts done yesterday. Some 500-1000 posts were vaporized.

U-S-A! ???

Randy is Paul wrote:

Sheet for brains wrote:

Rand Paul is a one dimensional bumbling pube headed fool

Rand Paul is proof intelligent design does not exist.

He’s proof of an imperfect creator

Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:

Da Truf wrote:

Shut up troll

Why not try a novel approach ... why not try "contributing" instead of just spewing insults. I am sure you are a swell person but just try contributing. Insults are not needed. They are for the lazy people. Witty people who have nice and often humorous retorts usually win the women. The ones who spew insults are usually at home alone on weekend nights.

STFU troll

Fat hurts wrote:

real facts wrote:

The reason they are hiding the whistleblower is because it is known he colluded with Schiff on his report and then didn't acknowledge that fact to the inspector general.

Do you have any evidence for this or are you just another nut job?

I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.

Fat hurts wrote:

Boogie Down Bronx wrote:

So do y’all think Sondland will plead the 5th? I think it’s a good possibility. His a$$ is in trouble. They should give him immunity and let him tell the truth THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

I think it would be unwise to take the 5th. There were at least three other people at the table and at least two apparently heard the phone call.

Sondland is busted.

The best way forward is to come clean and tell the whole truth. If he tells everything he knows to congress without delay then he might avoid prison time.

Oh, and there is another point that some are making, but I don't recall anyone here saying it.

The whole reason we know about the Sondland call is because of the Republican talking points about hearsay. State department official David Holmes heard Republicans talking about how nobody had first-hand knowledge of Tiny discussing the investigations. That's when Holmes realized that he personally had such first-hand information that was not yet in evidence.

Sometimes spinning gets you in trouble.

Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Do you have any evidence for this or are you just another nut job?

I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.

Everyone in Congress knows who he is. Why is Adam Schiff so vehemently opposed to having him appear before Congress. What is he afraid of? The whistleblower is an integral part of this impeachment hearing. Allow him to testify before in Congress in private. Why not???

Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Do you have any evidence for this or are you just another nut job?

I am not saying that this is a sure thing, but the whistleblower is alleged to have been colluding with Schiff and this has been going on for a long time. Again, I am not saying this actually happened but I have read about it in multiple sources. He also is alleged to be a CIA crony of John Brennan. I DO NOT want his identity exposed any further but he should be called to testify in private.

If it turns out he's the love child of Hillary and Obama, what does that have to do with the evidence against Trump?