Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

jesseriley wrote:

Holmes deposition is devastating to trump & Sondland.

Fat boy was screaming so loud on an unencrypted phone that Holmes heard everything, Sondland having to hold it away from his ear!

Donny “doesn’t give a $hit about Ukraine,” Sondland told Holmes.

So do y’all think Sondland will plead the 5th? I think it’s a good possibility. His a$$ is in trouble. They should give him immunity and let him tell the truth THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

That Ukraine ambassador was a gross looking democrat piece of trash.

Trump will be easily re-elected!!!!

Any attempt to remove Trump will be met with immediate force by the military, police and gun owners.

Democrats lose again!!!

over the top wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

You guys are overestimating the power of Letsrun. Maybe we can drive marathon cheaters to suicide, but the whistleblower's name has been disclosed in numerous places. Even Rand Paul identified him.

It is ILLEGAL to out or threaten a whistleblower. That others have mentioned an "alleged name" does not mean everyone can gang up and hope to get the person beaten up or murdered. Rand Paul is an idiot, and deserves to be booted from Congress for failing to uphold the law as he swore on a Bible he would do when he was seated.

https://cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Inspector-General/Whistleblower-Protection-Act-WPA

It is not so simple to say that it is illegal to "out" a whistleblower.

IT IS illegal for the Inspector General or a member of his or her staff to out the whistleblower. Members of Congress are immune from anything they say on the floor of Congress.

Whether Rigged or another individual could face criminal charges is a bit unclear. Please read this:

Midwest and southern voters agree wrote:

That Ukraine ambassador was a gross looking democrat piece of trash.

Trump will be easily re-elected!!!!

Any attempt to remove Trump will be met with immediate force by the military, police and gun owners.

The president is a gross looking Republican piece of trash.

Trump has repeatedly insulted generals, gone against their advice and has overridden the military justice system.

Trigged can’t read that! He probably hates not being able to spew here worse than anything.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Rigged for Who TF Knows wrote:

Didn't Rigged post the supposed identity of the whistle blower on here? That could put LRC in some serious legal jeopardy if true. Perhaps he has actually been banned.

You guys are overestimating the power of Letsrun. Maybe we can drive marathon cheaters to suicide, but the whistleblower's name has been disclosed in numerous places. Even Rand Paul identified him.

I'm not overestimating anything.

Outing the whistle blower's identity could well leave the entity doing the unmasking open to legal consequences. That's a fact.

Nobody ever said that this was the only place where someone named the alleged whistle blower.

Rand Paul also is innocent by reason of mental defect.

Prepare yourself for the flood of “immunity” rationales by ‘pubs, for every possible crime, by anyone who can even spell trump (plus some who can’t).

over the top wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

You guys are overestimating the power of Letsrun. Maybe we can drive marathon cheaters to suicide, but the whistleblower's name has been disclosed in numerous places. Even Rand Paul identified him.

It is ILLEGAL to out or threaten a whistleblower. That others have mentioned an "alleged name" does not mean everyone can gang up and hope to get the person beaten up or murdered. Rand Paul is an idiot, and deserves to be booted from Congress for failing to uphold the law as he swore on a Bible he would do when he was seated.

https://cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Inspector-General/Whistleblower-Protection-Act-WPA

There is nothing in what you referenced that says the whistleblower's identity is protected.

His job is what is protected.

You might want to try reading what you quote before you post it.

You might also consider getting a different news source than Rachel Maddow.

It is amazing what the fake news can get people to believe.

Not ID’ing the whistleblower is common sense, which you obviously lack. But it’s obviously retaliation, dumb@ss. And it could lead to the murder of the whistleblower, another crime that isn’t included in the law.

over the top wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

You guys are overestimating the power of Letsrun. Maybe we can drive marathon cheaters to suicide, but the whistleblower's name has been disclosed in numerous places. Even Rand Paul identified him.

It is ILLEGAL to out or threaten a whistleblower. That others have mentioned an "alleged name" does not mean everyone can gang up and hope to get the person beaten up or murdered. Rand Paul is an idiot, and deserves to be booted from Congress for failing to uphold the law as he swore on a Bible he would do when he was seated.

https://cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Inspector-General/Whistleblower-Protection-Act-WPA

My point is that Letsrun will not be on anyone's radar for a lawsuit. There are already plenty of targets with more money to go after.

Murdered whistleblowers usually lose their jobs

real facts wrote:

over the top wrote:

It is ILLEGAL to out or threaten a whistleblower. That others have mentioned an "alleged name" does not mean everyone can gang up and hope to get the person beaten up or murdered. Rand Paul is an idiot, and deserves to be booted from Congress for failing to uphold the law as he swore on a Bible he would do when he was seated.

https://cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Inspector-General/Whistleblower-Protection-Act-WPA

There is nothing in what you referenced that says the whistleblower's identity is protected.

His job is what is protected.

You might want to try reading what you quote before you post it.

You might also consider getting a different news source than Rachel Maddow.

It is amazing what the fake news can get people to believe.

0/10

Please identify where the law states it is legal to out a whistleblower.

Otherwise, 0/10.

jesseriley wrote:

Murdered whistleblowers usually lose their jobs

Outing a whistleblower falls under witness intimidation. That is illegal.

over the top wrote:

real facts wrote:

There is nothing in what you referenced that says the whistleblower's identity is protected.

His job is what is protected.

You might want to try reading what you quote before you post it.

You might also consider getting a different news source than Rachel Maddow.

It is amazing what the fake news can get people to believe.

0/10

Please identify where the law states it is legal to out a whistleblower.

Otherwise, 0/10.

You've got to be kidding. Your response is stunningly stupid.

intimdate wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

Murdered whistleblowers usually lose their jobs

Outing a whistleblower falls under witness intimidation. That is illegal.

https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/2019/02/21/what-witness-intimidation-heres-what-federal-and-vermont-law-say-about-tampering/2936545002/

At least this approach pretends to have a legal basis. It is BS though.

No one will be charged much less convicted under this.

The reason they are hiding the whistleblower is because it is known he colluded with Schiff on his report and then didn't acknowledge that fact to the inspector general.

And the Republicans would ask him about this under oath.

They would also expose his role in the Russia hoax.

real facts wrote:

At least this approach pretends to have a legal basis. It is BS though.

No one will be charged much less convicted under this.

You've got to be kidding. Your response is stunningly stupid.

real facts wrote:

intimdate wrote:

Outing a whistleblower falls under witness intimidation. That is illegal.

https://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/local/2019/02/21/what-witness-intimidation-heres-what-federal-and-vermont-law-say-about-tampering/2936545002/

At least this approach pretends to have a legal basis. It is BS though.

No one will be charged much less convicted under this.

The reason they are hiding the whistleblower is because it is known he colluded with Schiff on his report and then didn't acknowledge that fact to the inspector general.

And the Republicans would ask him about this under oath.

They would also expose his role in the Russia hoax.

Let’s say the whistleblower is a far left die hard Dem who hates Trump. What difference does that make? Everything he said was true. What is the purpose of outing him or her?

“Real Facts” Hillary is back, only dumber.