The Roches’ podcast is primarily about running and sports science, so sex-related discussions are secondary and framed within their positive, enthusiastic style. If you’re seeking more explicit or focused discussions on sex, podcasts like Sex With Emily or The Dildorks might be better matches.
The Roches’ podcast is primarily about running and sports science, so sex-related discussions are secondary and framed within their positive, enthusiastic style. If you’re seeking more explicit or focused discussions on sex, podcasts like Sex With Emily or The Dildorks might be better matches.
This has got to be one of the weirdest threads of all time.
The Roches’ podcast is primarily about running and sports science, so sex-related discussions are secondary and framed within their positive, enthusiastic style. If you’re seeking more explicit or focused discussions on sex, podcasts like Sex With Emily or The Dildorks might be better matches.
This has got to be one of the weirdest threads of all time.
Just let this sink in - he is such a weird gross creepy deviant that his posts get deleted from letsrun.com, which is itself often a cesspool. Thats how bizarre his behavior is.
This post was edited 28 seconds after it was posted.
I find Roche to be pretty irritating, but his latest video actually isn’t so bad.
Let this sink in, "isn't really so bad" critique is still followed up by a bunch of weird stuff which if done by anyone else would raise so many eyebrows that we'd just ignore and move one, but Roche yet again gets a pass as what constitutes "kinda bizarre" is just different for him.
I don't like watching someone have a life crisis, but this is what it feels like. Just like the whole Liver King thing -- a comparison that I've made before and earnestly. I agree this dude could be a really great, honestly positive Masters trail runner, with a healthy relationship (and yes healthy sex life he keeps to himself, and which I could give less a f- about), have real friends, have clients that can give honest testimonials a thriving business, an interesting and informed take on sport science, AND also have a somewhat quirky sense of humor,
but what we get is just three ring circus that he has decided to develop instead.
I agree this dude could be a really great, honestly positive Masters trail runner, with a healthy relationship (and yes healthy sex life he keeps to himself, and which I could give less a f- about),
David and Megan have made the consensual choice to discuss their sex life in a public setting. Personally, I like what they have to say about sex. Not sure what's so wrong to say about that. If someone can use logic and reasoning to tell me what's so wrong, please do so
Just let this sink in - he is such a weird gross creepy deviant that his posts get deleted from letsrun.com, which is itself often a cesspool. Thats how bizarre his behavior is.
The Roches’ podcast is primarily about running and sports science, so sex-related discussions are secondary and framed within their positive, enthusiastic style. If you’re seeking more explicit or focused discussions on sex, podcasts like Sex With Emily or The Dildorks might be better matches.
This has got to be one of the weirdest threads of all time.
I think people are trying to pull off the AI style, but Roger Biebert and I think ELTON'S PORTABLE JOHN had it nailed in the SJD threads the last few years.
In case you missed it, Megan claimed that if David put in two years, he'd be in sub-2:10 marathon shape on the podcast today. A massive "F*** you. You're a loser." to anyone like Jake Barraclough who's been actually training for that from her, I guess.
In case you missed it, Megan claimed that if David put in two years, he'd be in sub-2:10 marathon shape on the podcast today. A massive "F*** you. You're a loser." to anyone like Jake Barraclough who's been actually training for that from her, I guess.
He should make a YouTube series about his training and just do uphill treadmill werkoutz
"On this week’s SWAP podcast, Megan said to David, “If you trained really hard for this for like, two years, you could do great in the marathon.” That’s it. That was the whole quote. Naturally, LetsRun heard: “My husband could run 2:10, probably faster, and anyone who tries and fails is a loser.” Cue the outrage.
But it was just two dorky coaches bantering, with Megan opening by saying she’d never get close to 2:09, and David following with “I’d get trucked by anyone in any major marathon.” The energy was less ego trip, more breakfast pep talk.
Still, we get it: sincere belief in a partner, delivered with affection and zero irony, is disorienting to watch. Megan, like some kind of midwife of individuation; David, calibrating heart rate against existential noise, chasing transcendence up a belt-driven slope.
Anyway. Hug someone. Or don’t. Just please don’t interpret every podcast quip as a shot across the bow."
"On this week’s SWAP podcast, Megan said to David, “If you trained really hard for this for like, two years, you could do great in the marathon.” That’s it. That was the whole quote. Naturally, LetsRun heard: “My husband could run 2:10, probably faster, and anyone who tries and fails is a loser.” Cue the outrage.
But it was just two dorky coaches bantering, with Megan opening by saying she’d never get close to 2:09, and David following with “I’d get trucked by anyone in any major marathon.” The energy was less ego trip, more breakfast pep talk.
Still, we get it: sincere belief in a partner, delivered with affection and zero irony, is disorienting to watch. Megan, like some kind of midwife of individuation; David, calibrating heart rate against existential noise, chasing transcendence up a belt-driven slope.
Anyway. Hug someone. Or don’t. Just please don’t interpret every podcast quip as a shot across the bow."
How’s therapy going David? Did you tell them about the “chatbot thing” yet?
"On this week’s SWAP podcast, Megan said to David, “If you trained really hard for this for like, two years, you could do great in the marathon.” That’s it. That was the whole quote. Naturally, LetsRun heard: “My husband could run 2:10, probably faster, and anyone who tries and fails is a loser.” Cue the outrage.
But it was just two dorky coaches bantering, with Megan opening by saying she’d never get close to 2:09, and David following with “I’d get trucked by anyone in any major marathon.” The energy was less ego trip, more breakfast pep talk.
Still, we get it: sincere belief in a partner, delivered with affection and zero irony, is disorienting to watch. Megan, like some kind of midwife of individuation; David, calibrating heart rate against existential noise, chasing transcendence up a belt-driven slope.
Anyway. Hug someone. Or don’t. Just please don’t interpret every podcast quip as a shot across the bow."
Out of one side of his mouth: acknowledging the need to stop arguing and debating the internet.
Out of the other side of his mouth: arguing and debating the internet.
David, err, Claude, you need to get your diagnostics checked. You're lying just like David and Megan lie on their social media channels.
The whole quote from Megan is ".... at the top level, like for us, like you know, neither of us has run a road marathon and neither of us would get, well you probably would, but I would get nowhere near, you know, a 2:09 marathon."
Perhaps you had trouble sifting through DR megan's filler words, run-on sentence structure, and double negatives. I helped you out by bolding exactly what she said. Maybe time to switch to Chat GPT!
This post was edited 13 minutes after it was posted.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.