Official Covid Vaccine thread

Harambe wrote:

Noyankee wrote:

So now that you’ve lost any dignity over how great vaccinations are, you turn to sports? Rodgers, along w Djokovic, Irving, Slater and others are hero’s not over their sports but over their ability to speak the truth when so many would rather support those addicts who dream.

Lol they all took Major Ls. Antivaxxers remain devastated

LOL! +1

Antivaxxer clowns stay humiliated, as always. The universe remains in balance

Stopping early treatment options to protect the vaccines.

Because they care about our health.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7frLVNf4mqE

[quote]2600 bro wrote:

Vaccines work remarkably well,

What do they do? Do they stop transmission? No they don't.

Do they have adverse outcomes? Yes they do.

Naturally, this paper will be immediately dismissed as not being published in a major medical journal, and the authors will be attacked and undermined for myriad reasons. Of course this is not yet peer reviewed, but “real science” would have to consider these findings and do follow up studies, and do them in a timely manner.

Just read the discussion and conclusion. This is what many of us have warned about for quite some time.

Harambe wrote:

Rodgers vaccination debacle doomed the packers. Team was obviously worse after the saga.

Wasted talent. Ruined by hubris.

Antivaxxers remain at home devastated.

Fools like you blaming Rodgers vaccination status on the outcome of last nights game are as bad as the fools that blame Australian Open dropouts on the vaccine. None are related to the other. If there were a correlation between the two, then Rodgers badly outplaying vaccinated Jimmy G (pretty clear in the stats who played better between the two QBs in the conditions).would serve as evidence to the contrary. Your position reveals more about how you will still maintain the same vitriol toward the unvaccinated even as vaccinated individuals become COVID cases at the same pace as the unvaccinated.

Covidiocy wrote:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

Naturally, this paper will be immediately dismissed as not being published in a major medical journal, and the authors will be attacked and undermined for myriad reasons. Of course this is not yet peer reviewed, but “real science” would have to consider these findings and do follow up studies, and do them in a timely manner.

Just read the discussion and conclusion. This is what many of us have warned about for quite some time.

You would probably be shocked at the number of Studies that have initial results that are completely negated by follow up study/ peer reviewed.

That’s called science literacy

I mean how much did you invest in Thanos

**theranos**

A

carmine69 wrote:

Covidiocy wrote:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs

Naturally, this paper will be immediately dismissed as not being published in a major medical journal, and the authors will be attacked and undermined for myriad reasons. Of course this is not yet peer reviewed, but “real science” would have to consider these findings and do follow up studies, and do them in a timely manner.

Just read the discussion and conclusion. This is what many of us have warned about for quite some time.

You would probably be shocked at the number of Studies that have initial results that are completely negated by follow up study/ peer reviewed.

That’s called science literacy

I mean how much did you invest in Thanos

Nope, I wouldn’t be shocked at all. I am very familiar with this process, grants, funding, research, replication via other or bigger studies, vetting, publication. The point is, real science wouldn’t dismiss this out of hand because it is counter trend narrative in the midst of a pandemic, seemingly without any other plausible, ubiquitous solution. Real science would look at this, explore the methodology, and attempt to negate it or confirm it.

The judge and jury is still very much out.

I don’t get your point …are you saying real science isn’t studying the long term efficacy of vaccines? Or natural immunity vs. vax?? That’s false. A straw-man.

But I will note that two of the lead authors are a documented anti-vax electrical engineer and a naturopath. Don’t be dazzled by a lot of words sons

2600 bro wrote:

Futile*

Sorry I am hammered celebrating the 49ers (representing our liberal utopia) dominating the anti-vax losers.

Liberal utopia? Poop on the streets and poop on your dicks?

carmine69 wrote:

I don’t get your point …are you saying real science isn’t studying the long term efficacy of vaccines? Or natural immunity vs. vax?? That’s false. A straw-man.

But I will note that two of the lead authors are a documented anti-vax electrical engineer and a naturopath. Don’t be dazzled by a lot of words sons

Nope, not what I’m saying at all. Operative words are “long term,” in all regards.

Hardly bedazzled by the words as a scientist… yes, the easiest, most predictable red herring of all is to undermine the authors… which is why I noted it in the original post. The last two authors have “credentials,” and, while vaccine skeptics (not antivax, as in NO ONE should get them), this research needs to be expanded upon and validated.

Perhaps be dazzled by hundreds of legitimate citations. I’m not saying this paper is correct. I’m saying it has raised important points that some of us have been raising for a year. Let’s not just dismiss them out of hand.

Vaccine batches marked by varying toxicity

According to Wodarg, a German medical doctor and epidemiologist specializing in lung diseases and environmental medicine, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data shows vaccine batches are sequentially marked by varying toxicity.

He added that this has now been statistically graphed out.

“It’s not the vaccinations. It’s not true that there is the same stuff in each in each shot. And we have a very hard evidence with the batches that are different, shaped differently, have different effect,” Wodarg explained.

Wodarg took note of the lots and batches in the U.S. where there were no cases, while other batches showed many people dying. He explained that in some batches you can see that something is happening and this is where cases of toxicity expressed in deaths are seen. The German doctor added that the Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson vaccines have a horrible accumulation of cases in certain batches.

If this is true, then someone has some ‘splaining to do…

I’ve not heard this before. I had a close acquaintance go immediately downhill after her second shot & never recover. She passed. I wonder if she was part of the trial run.? Young, 47, healthy, leaves a teen son behind. Very sad. But, of course I will be branded a Q conspiracist or some other such bull$hit.

Covidiocy wrote:

Covidiocy wrote:

If this is true, then someone has some ‘splaining to do…

I’ve not heard this before. I had a close acquaintance go immediately downhill after her second shot & never recover. She passed. I wonder if she was part of the trial run.? Young, 47, healthy, leaves a teen son behind. Very sad. But, of course I will be branded a Q conspiracist or some other such bull$hit.

I have heard about bad batches and safe batches of the jab. This German Doctor claims to have shown this is the case.

It's no true. VAERS data is incredibly confounded due to reporting differences between doctors/hospitals/locations etc.

'We do exist': Some Americans suffer life-changing COVID vaccine injuries

“The government won’t help you. The drug companies won’t help you. Your medical teams will have no idea what to do with you. Financially you will be on your own,” she said. “You will be completely on your own.”

2600 bro wrote:

"Vaccine extremists' LOL. Vaccines work remarkably well, have saved millions of lives, and those that vocally oppose them or cast doubt on their efficacy are either stupid or malevolent - both deserve ridicule.

Really kid? Spoken like a true foot soldier for the industry. Lol.

"41,009,389 Adverse Events and 861,082 Vaccine Deaths Says Calculated VAERS Data."

Let's start telling it like it is wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

"Vaccine extremists' LOL. Vaccines work remarkably well, have saved millions of lives, and those that vocally oppose them or cast doubt on their efficacy are either stupid or malevolent - both deserve ridicule.

Really kid? Spoken like a true foot soldier for the industry. Lol.

"41,009,389 Adverse Events and 861,082 Vaccine Deaths Says Calculated VAERS Data."

https://thenewamerican.com/41009389-adverse-events-and-861082-vaccine-deaths-says-calculated-vaers-data/

The New American (TNA) is a far-right print and digital magazine published twice a month by American Opinion Publishing Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the John Birch Society (JBS), a far-right organization.[2][3][4][5][6] The magazine was created in 1985 from the merger of two JBS magazines: American Opinion and The Review of the News.

Yes, the "The New American" is a great scientific research publication with no hidden agenda !?!?