Notice how the Fox News link you provided did not mention the alleged Whistle Blower's name?
But this GOP representative did.
And Letsrun continues to allow you to post the name in text form so that we can see it.
Either by writing it citing it.
And we know people keep reporting your posts but nothing is done.
Racket wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I didn't even know about this. I never knew that it was perfectly legal to lie to government agencies.
So when you read that statement from Warren, did you even bother to think if it passed the smell test at a minimum?
Knowingly lying to government agencies is called fraud and includes such charges as :
-misleading investors;
-securities fraud;
-criminal conspiracy;
That's exactly what Warren is saying. Those other forms of fraud are illegal. But it is not illegal to present false or misleading documents to a regulatory agency.
If you have evidence that the law already covers what Warren is describing then please enlighten us.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
From Congressman Dan Bishop NC-9th District:
twitter com
And ONCE AGAIN, ^this retard posts a link to the alleged whistleblower.
BROJOS: BAN THIS RETARD FOR ALL TIME.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
From Congressman Dan Bishop NC-9th District:
https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1194060811116957696And now this:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/icig-complaint-ukraine-whistleblower.amp?__twitter_impression=true
Dan Bishop should be brought up on ethics charges and removed from office.
Rigged for Hillary should be removed from LRC.
Bye bye Mark. No more serious Republican challengers for Trump.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-11-12/mark-sanford-trump-ends-bid
#Trumplandslide
KAG2020
It’s awake! Trigged realizes only he can stop the impeachment...
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
From Congressman Dan Bishop NC-9th District:
https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1194060811116957696And now this:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/icig-complaint-ukraine-whistleblower.amp?__twitter_impression=trueDan Bishop should be brought up on ethics charges and removed from office.
Rigged for Hillary should be removed from LRC.
Did you forget that I'm doing the Runningart challenge? If Trump loses, I'm gone and you get your wish.
Pocahonky is your best bet. Good luck with that.
KAG2020
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Bye bye Mark. No more serious Republican challengers for Trump.
Mark Sanford was never a serious challenger to Trump.
Fred G. Sanford would get a lot more votes than Mark.
Fat hurts wrote:
Racket wrote:
So when you read that statement from Warren, did you even bother to think if it passed the smell test at a minimum?
Knowingly lying to government agencies is called fraud and includes such charges as :
-misleading investors;
-securities fraud;
-criminal conspiracy;
That's exactly what Warren is saying. Those other forms of fraud are illegal. But it is not illegal to present false or misleading documents to a regulatory agency.
If you have evidence that the law already covers what Warren is describing then please enlighten us.
It is literally securities fraud to submit false or misleading documents to the SEC which is a a regulatory agency. This includes quarterly statement and 10Ks. There is an entire multi-billion dollar business of auditing and accounting to make sure companies don't do that exact thing.
What scenario exactly are you suggesting where CEOs are getting away with fraud? CEOs blow smoke out of their a$$es all the time. Don't confuse that for actual fraud
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Bye bye Mark. No more serious Republican challengers for Trump.
Mark Sanford was never a serious challenger to Trump.
Fred G. Sanford would get a lot more votes than Mark.
Fred Sanford could fake a heart attack and get the sympathy votes.
Trigged wished for no challengers, but if trump doesn’t run (likely) the ‘pubs will be even further up a creek.
Racket wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
That's exactly what Warren is saying. Those other forms of fraud are illegal. But it is not illegal to present false or misleading documents to a regulatory agency.
If you have evidence that the law already covers what Warren is describing then please enlighten us.
It is literally securities fraud to submit false or misleading documents to the SEC which is a a regulatory agency. This includes quarterly statement and 10Ks. There is an entire multi-billion dollar business of auditing and accounting to make sure companies don't do that exact thing.
What scenario exactly are you suggesting where CEOs are getting away with fraud? CEOs blow smoke out of their a$$es all the time. Don't confuse that for actual fraud
Yes, financial fraud is specifically covered in the law and Warren acknowledges that.
Go and read Warrens actual proposal to see what is not covered.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
From Congressman Dan Bishop NC-9th District:
https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1194060811116957696And now this:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/icig-complaint-ukraine-whistleblower.amp?__twitter_impression=true
Maybe Rep Bishop should temper his tweets possibly putting himself in legal/ethical danger and regarding idiot conspiracy theories and show up to a vote once in a while.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Here is where she is "hoping" to have a House vote by end of year. I have heard a few times how she has promised but still trying to find that.
https://www.wnd.com/2019/09/heartbroken-pelosi-fast-tracks-impeachment/You have been told this already. She did not promise, you fool.
What happened to "Post not read?" Yesterday you were putting that on every post (though just a few) to you. What changed from yesterday to today? You have no control over yourself and just had to respond calling me a pool.
Serious questions for the Libs/Dems here. Alan is about the only one who doesn't hurl insults at the conservatives here with regularity. Just on the last page you can find Libs hurling "idiot," "fool," "retard," etc., etc. Rigged doesn't do insults. I don't do insults. Not sure about Ghost - his insults are more of the benign nature. What is in your composition that you have to hurl insults at those who disagree with you? It is a real problem that you have. In real life, do you act the same way? You must. Because here you are so comfortable doing that and it just seems nature to you. I have never insulted another person in real life. If I don't like what they say I keep my mouth shut. I am sure this will engender more insults which is fine. I have pretty thick skin. God bless you all but maybe lose the insults. Have a civil discourse because that has eluded you so far.
Fat hurts wrote:
Racket wrote:
It is literally securities fraud to submit false or misleading documents to the SEC which is a a regulatory agency. This includes quarterly statement and 10Ks. There is an entire multi-billion dollar business of auditing and accounting to make sure companies don't do that exact thing.
What scenario exactly are you suggesting where CEOs are getting away with fraud? CEOs blow smoke out of their a$$es all the time. Don't confuse that for actual fraud
Yes, financial fraud is specifically covered in the law and Warren acknowledges that.
Go and read Warrens actual proposal to see what is not covered.
Here's warren's piece.
I don't know enough to present an argument either way.
That said, I don't trust elizabeth warren when it comes to criticizing corporations. She has made up her mind and goes around looking for ways to condemn them. that's her thing. So I don't trust anything she says about corporations. Like I dont' trust anything Bush2 might say about the oil business. They aren't dependable sources for facts.
https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/fighting-corporate-perjury?source=soc-WB-ew-twSally Vix wrote:
I have pretty thick skin.
Your skin isn't remotely thick. You always whine about the insults appropriately thrown your way.
One thing which is thick is your head. Dense would be the word for it.
Just read an intersting piece that maps out a route to remove trump.
there are no rules for the senate trial.
So, say, three R senators hold out and insist on a secret ballot, like in regular trials.
Say McConnell can't beat them back.
So a secret ballot is adopted.
We all know many R senators would vote to convict if they could do it on a secret ballot.
It's not going to happen, but it is interesting to think of three R senators, say in their 70s, who want to leave a mark for history.
Racket wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
That's exactly what Warren is saying. Those other forms of fraud are illegal. But it is not illegal to present false or misleading documents to a regulatory agency.
If you have evidence that the law already covers what Warren is describing then please enlighten us.
It is literally securities fraud to submit false or misleading documents to the SEC which is a a regulatory agency. This includes quarterly statement and 10Ks. There is an entire multi-billion dollar business of auditing and accounting to make sure companies don't do that exact thing.
What scenario exactly are you suggesting where CEOs are getting away with fraud? CEOs blow smoke out of their a$$es all the time. Don't confuse that for actual fraud
Fat Hurts - this is not one of your better posts. To suggest that there is no illegality in presenting false statements to a regulatory agency is absurd. Absolutely absurd. The IRS is a regulatory agency. You think people submitting false statements are going to be going home at the end of the day? The IRS puts in prison people who submit false statements to it. Ask Welsey Snipes. Ask Al Capone.
I didn’t realize there were any conservatives here, including our subject, fat boy.
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
From Congressman Dan Bishop NC-9th District:
https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1194060811116957696And now this:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/icig-complaint-ukraine-whistleblower.amp?__twitter_impression=trueDan Bishop should be brought up on ethics charges and removed from office.
Rigged for Hillary should be removed from LRC.
Agreed.