Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
[your post unread]
I have used my Trump Sharpie marker to officially transcribe Flagpole's post to Sally.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
[your post unread]
I have used my Trump Sharpie marker to officially transcribe Flagpole's post to Sally.
Sally Vix wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
Let’s see, today you can’t trash Vindman & the various military witnesses against fat boy...
Can’t praise russia...
Surely you’ll explode!
Here is the deal, Jesse. The whistleblower name should not be or have been revealed. That is a shame and Rigged is wrong in doing that. BUT, the whistleblower's relationship with House Intel chief Adam Schiff and how he was possibly coached by Schiff definitely needs to be investigated. I think you would agree, the Dems in the House would agree and the House Repubs would agree..
I had other stuff to say but am distracted.
Well then focus on this. The whistleblower is now secondary to the investigation because of the evidence which has come forth since the whistleblower first brought the situation up.
You're going along with the WH/Republican distraction mechanism.
Oh.....and you're a boob.
Beto O. wrote:
Today is a holiday wrote:
Nim-rata Rand-ha-wa, why does it bother you?
You must be new here. tRiggered for Hillary has been attacking Beto O'Rourke, calling him "Beta" and a fake Hispanic with a fake Spanish nickname. The comments about, why does it bother you about Nimrata Haley (nee. Randhawa), going by Nikki is no big deal while failing to callout tRiggered for Hillary just proves you are a right-wing troll.
I called him Beta O'Dork- which describes him perfectly.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
tRiggered for Hillary's post transcribed.
— Trump's Sharpie
If Rigged did post the name of the whistle blower he is using this message board to participate in a crime. There are important safety and security reasons why the identity of the whistle blower is legally protected. Particularly in this highly emotional setting, publishing the name of the whistle blower does great harm to that person and his family. I think if anyone engages and uses this message board to commit a crime or to put someone else in danger that should obviously result in automatic banning. This behavior is disgusting and Rigged has shown by engaging in this behavior he has no place on this message board. This is beyond politics and is about decency and following the law.
Flagpole wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Wrong as usual.
The current whistleblower law was unanimously passed by both houses in 1989. Even Mitch McConnell voted for it.
You are promoting violence by outing someone as the whistleblower. You are helping to get this person killed.
CORRECT! REPUBLICAN Chuck Grassley was instrumental in getting the current whistle blower laws to where they are. Rigged continues to show how ignorant he is with just about every post he makes, and with this whistle blower stuff, he has shown what a bad person he is. Can't win on the facts of the case, so we have to intimidate someone in the hopes of silencing him and others. Sickening. If something ever does happen to that guy, and his family's lawyers start looking into who outed him and where, I'll be sure to point them to LRC and this particular poster. I'll also be sure to let them know that several of us called for his banning. This is beyond ridiculous.
Conundrum wrote:
If Rigged did post the name of the whistle blower he is using this message board to participate in a crime. There are important safety and security reasons why the identity of the whistle blower is legally protected. Particularly in this highly emotional setting, publishing the name of the whistle blower does great harm to that person and his family.
I think if anyone engages and uses this message board to commit a crime or to put someone else in danger that should obviously result in automatic banning.
This behavior is disgusting and Rigged has shown by engaging in this behavior he has no place on this message board.
This is beyond politics and is about decency and following the law.
Preaching to the choir telling me this. You should let Wejo know how you feel:
weldonjohnson@gmail.comTo Letsrun's credit, they have removed some of Rigged's posts where he named the ALLEGED whistle blower.
They really need to do a search on the whole site for the name and remove all of those posts.
Right is right.
So that’s why LRC pulled it down, trigged? Because they’re lunatics? I guess everyone else is crazy, it couldn’t be you.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
If Rigged did post the name of the whistle blower he is using this message board to participate in a crime. There are important safety and security reasons why the identity of the whistle blower is legally protected. Particularly in this highly emotional setting, publishing the name of the whistle blower does great harm to that person and his family.
I think if anyone engages and uses this message board to commit a crime or to put someone else in danger that should obviously result in automatic banning.
This behavior is disgusting and Rigged has shown by engaging in this behavior he has no place on this message board.
This is beyond politics and is about decency and following the law.
Hey lunatics,
Several media personalities and twitter folks with blue checkmarks have already leaked Eric Ciaramella's name long before I ever did. Here is a partial list:
Rush Limbaugh
Don Trump Jr
Joe diGenova
Mollie Hemingway
Mike Cernovich
Lars Larson
Paul Sperry (Real Clear Investigations)
71Republic
I wish you good luck with getting their arrests.
KAG2020
You are an assshole and a moron.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
If Rigged did post the name of the whistle blower he is using this message board to participate in a crime. There are important safety and security reasons why the identity of the whistle blower is legally protected. Particularly in this highly emotional setting, publishing the name of the whistle blower does great harm to that person and his family.
I think if anyone engages and uses this message board to commit a crime or to put someone else in danger that should obviously result in automatic banning.
This behavior is disgusting and Rigged has shown by engaging in this behavior he has no place on this message board.
This is beyond politics and is about decency and following the law.
Hey lunatics,
Several media personalities and twitter folks with blue checkmarks have already leaked Eric Ciaramella's name long before I ever did. Here is a partial list:
Rush Limbaugh
Don Trump Jr
Joe diGenova
Mollie Hemingway
Mike Cernovich
Lars Larson
Paul Sperry (Real Clear Investigations)
71Republic
I wish you good luck with getting their arrests.
KAG2020
I forgot to include Dan Bongino to the list of arrests, LOL!
He "only" has 3.1M followers on Twitter and appears on Fox News every week.
Go get 'em libs. They are all scared of the FBI perp walking them any minute.
Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!!!!
Smorbun wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Hey lunatics,
Several media personalities and twitter folks with blue checkmarks have already leaked Eric Ciaramella's name long before I ever did. Here is a partial list:
Rush Limbaugh
Don Trump Jr
Joe diGenova
Mollie Hemingway
Mike Cernovich
Lars Larson
Paul Sperry (Real Clear Investigations)
71Republic
I wish you good luck with getting their arrests.
KAG2020
You are an assshole and a moron.
You are a batshit, nutjob with terminal TDS. Call the FBI and see that those media personalties are hauled off in handcuffs.
And for the record, Eric Ciaramella is CIA- an organization that is very good at hiding people. He is a spy and has been well trained in surveillance, counter-surveillance, spy tradecraft, etc and is probably holed up in a safe house with armed guards 24x7. So spare me your hysterics, please.
Nothing better wrote:
Nothing better than watching hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!!!!
The lib meltdown today is one for the record books. I'm glad to have got them all hot & bothered.
We caregivers deal with damaged individuals all day long. Your act is pretty familiar.
jesseriley wrote:
We caregivers deal with damaged individuals all day long. Your act is pretty familiar.
Do you change Quid Pro Joe's diapers too?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
We caregivers deal with damaged individuals all day long. Your act is pretty familiar.
Do you change Quid Pro Joe's diapers too?
Ah, idiot wanker #1. I see after reading today's posts that you are much more than just an idiot wanker. I didn't know you were a coit as well. Now I know. You are full of surprises, mate.
“...it’s like people who go and watch professional wrestling and don’t realize it’s fixed. If they can’t see it when it’s right under their nose, I have no idea how they’re going to realize how wrong they are.”
https://news.yahoo.com/john-cleese-trump-fox-news-100932301.html
A list of people who have contributed to spreading the name of an individual whose anonymity is legally protected has been posted here. Because there is a list of people do this, that in no way makes it less wrong.
Although technically they have broken the law, obviously they are under no threat of legal action.
However anyone who participated in spreading the identity of that protected person via social media, knowing full well the abuse that will create for that family, has no decency.
Even Fox news and the other major networks are not publishing that name.
The individual who posts under the handle "rigged......." Is intentionally joining the group that wants to bring harm to this individual.
This is beyond politics.