Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

I’m seeing you in a “lawless suit” (prison uniform) for treason, unregistered foreign agent & tax evasion (since you didn’t register, I’m guessing it’s under-the-table payment).

Sally’s making sure putin has his constitutional free-speech rights on Veteran’s Day.

Nice.

Racket wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

{your post was unread as well - Dismissed}

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you : the moment an unstoppable force meets an immovable object!

Flagpole and I are very different. I will listen to others' arguments and might adjust my stance on that particular issue given the persuasiveness and sincerity of the person putting forth that argument. Flagpole will never change. He is imprisoned by the liberal dogma and the hate against trump and will just spew hate and vile things against everything and everyone conservative.

jesseriley wrote:

I’m seeing you in a “lawless suit” (prison uniform) for treason, unregistered foreign agent & tax evasion (since you didn’t register, I’m guessing it’s under-the-table payment).

Kudos, Jesse. That was a pretty good one.

Veteran’s Day must be quite painful for you traitors.

Let’s see, today you can’t trash Vindman & the various military witnesses against fat boy...

Can’t praise russia...

Surely you’ll explode!

Today is a holiday wrote:

Nim-rata Rand-ha-wa, why does it bother you?

You must be new here. tRiggered for Hillary has been attacking Beto O'Rourke, calling him "Beta" and a fake Hispanic with a fake Spanish nickname. The comments about, why does it bother you about Nimrata Haley (nee. Randhawa), going by Nikki is no big deal while failing to callout tRiggered for Hillary just proves you are a right-wing troll.

jesseriley wrote:

Let’s see, today you can’t trash Vindman & the various military witnesses against fat boy...

Can’t praise russia...

Surely you’ll explode!

Here is the deal, Jesse. The whistleblower name should not be or have been revealed. That is a shame and Rigged is wrong in doing that. BUT, the whistleblower's relationship with House Intel chief Adam Schiff and how he was possibly coached by Schiff definitely needs to be investigated. I think you would agree, the Dems in the House would agree and the House Repubs would agree..

I had other stuff to say but am distracted.

Today is a holiday wrote:

Nim-rata Rand-ha-wa, why does it bother you? FYI Nikki is a punjabi term. she lucked out as in English that nickname doesn't imply she has foreign ancestry. she can fly under the m@ga radar

She actually changed her name for "political" reasons. She knew no conservatives would vote for a Nimrata. Worse for her, she used to use her maiden name as her last name, and did not adopt her husband's last name. Her reason for switching from Randhawa (8 letters) was that it would not fit on a yard sign like Haley (5 letters).

Just realize that Nimrata "Nikki" whoever is a very shallow person.

businesses wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Doesn't mean each worker at those places works all those days. Typically if you work Christmas you might have Thanksgiving off, and then other holidays too. What an odd response.

What a bizarre reply. Why reply at all?

You are digging yourself in deeper and deeper. Maybe you should try going outside on a holiday to see who is working those days. It seems that you stay locked inside.

You guys are comparing apples and oranges. Offices are closed and retail establishments are open.

I missed mentioning that Nikki Haley reidentified herself as White from Indian. Ahem, no, Nimrata. Just no. You cannot simply erase you race by changing your name.

Fat hurts wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Since the Democrats are in control of the House, they also changed the rules for what constitutes a whistleblower. Hearsay is now permitted. This is politics people.

Clownpole now wants to use his liberal activist ideology to ban people. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

KAG2020

Wrong as usual.

The current whistleblower law was unanimously passed by both houses in 1989. Even Mitch McConnell voted for it.

You are promoting violence by outing someone as the whistleblower. You are helping to get this person killed.

CORRECT! REPUBLICAN Chuck Grassley was instrumental in getting the current whistle blower laws to where they are. Rigged continues to show how ignorant he is with just about every post he makes, and with this whistle blower stuff, he has shown what a bad person he is. Can't win on the facts of the case, so we have to intimidate someone in the hopes of silencing him and others. Sickening. If something ever does happen to that guy, and his family's lawyers start looking into who outed him and where, I'll be sure to point them to LRC and this particular poster. I'll also be sure to let them know that several of us called for his banning. This is beyond ridiculous.

These are your typical creeps.

Outing the whistleblower & droning on about him is what passes for tactics to get the subject off fat boy’s obvious crimes. It’s not working.

Sally Vix wrote:

...might adjust my stance on that particular issue....

HAHAHAHA I have yet to observe that. All you do when confronted with indisputable facts is to say you'll look at it later. actually, you are even worse because despite sometimes coming to your senses you come back repeatedly with the same exact weak arguments and blatant lies.

[your post unread]

Sally Vix wrote:

BUT, the whistleblower's relationship with House Intel chief Adam Schiff and how he was possibly coached by Schiff definitely needs to be investigated. I think you would agree, the Dems in the House would agree and the House Repubs would agree..

The whistle blower is moot now because of all of the evidence that was come forth.

If the whistle blower's identity is not confirmed, you can't look into a relationship with Schiff.

And you certainly can't investigate that he was "possibly" coached by Schiff.

This is some serious misdirection.

And what if the whistle blower was identified and befriended and was coached by Schiff - so what?

Throw that testimony out - even though it isn't even in.

Go with the facts at hand and testimony actually has happened.

It's like twelve people witness a murder and you want to acquit the murderer because you are not sure about the validity of what one person says.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole, "Lawsuits" are a claim or dispute brought to a court of law for adjudication. "Law Suits" (your word) are, I guess, what an attorney wears to work.

[your post unread]

Flagpole - my post was posted at about 5ft. I understand it was too high for you. So here I am donating this so you can step up and read my post in the future ...

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

[your post unread]

Flagpole - my post was posted at about 5ft. I understand it was too high for you. So here I am donating this so you can step up and read my post in the future ...

https://www.amazon.com/Cosco-2-Step-Household-Folding-Stool/dp/B002AAZGQG/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=stepladder&qid=1573507227&sr=8-6

[your post unread]