Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Uh oh!

"As House Democrats begin to release transcripts of closed-door testimony and prepare for public hearings as part of their impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump, public support for impeaching the president has fallen."

https://morningconsult.com/2019/11/06/support-for-impeachment-falls-as-inquiry-moves-to-new-phase/

Uh oh, again!

Suffolk poll:

36% favor the House should vote to impeach

22% said the House should continue investigation but not impeach

37% said the House should drop its investigations

5% did not have an answer or refused to give one

https://www.suffolk.edu/-/media/suffolk/documents/academics/research-at-suffolk/suprc/polls/national/2019/10_29_2019_marginals_pdftxt.pdf?la=en&hash=48E3F50F457FCE9564919D7E53843CC8966074D1

These are not the kind of numbers to favor the Clownpole's case.

America first!

#Trumplandslide

KAG2020

Racket wrote:

Nope Purrzzz wrote:

Nope.

People say that ("people WANT gridlock") all the time. But it's BS.

1) People pretty much always think things suck. So whoever is in power (Rs or Ds) get blamed after a bit of time in power and people vote the other way. Doesn't say anything about "people want gridlock."

2) 95% of voters vote party line. Which means that 95% of voters DEFINITELY don't want gridlock.

///

Now, would you please stop spouting that nonsense?

People prefer divided government more than the alternative. It's a fact, and I suspect you've consumed high quantities of lead and/or mercury from a young age.

Hey, thanks for doubling down on stupid.

I post proof, logic and analysis to back up what is clearly true.

You post absolutely ZERO content.

Go ahead and show me where most people vote for divided government. Or just keeping piling up stupid. Your call, chief.

I'm not going to dispute your stats, although I probably could.

the better way to answer you is that things have changed. It's not 2016 anymore. 2018 happened. Things changed. People know who Trump is now. HRC isn't running.

the game is different now.

Military and police on Trump’s side wrote:

You want civil war, you democrat pieces of trash????

Bring it on!!!!

Military, police and gun owners are on our side!!!!

Midwest and southern voters agree!!!!

Even though I lean left, your numbers are accurate. There’s a couple of things I’d take issue with.

29% of Hispanics is not a good return at all, especially when you consider that George W Bush won 45% support. 8% of AA is pitiful also.

Agree about 50K, but the right wing media and Trump campaign spun that one also. The largely false narrative about the poor forgotten blue collar man coming out for Trump was mostly incorrect as your numbers show.

Fat hurts wrote:

agip wrote:

can't you non-biden people at least acknowledge that his moderate stance and lack of fiery demands for change...are exactly what the purple voters want? And that those are the people we need next year?

No.

We need whoever will put the fossil fuel companies out of business. Nothing else matters.

If that's Biden then fine. But I don't think he's the one who will do it.

Nutcase detected. ^

Correct. Crazy Bernie had no chance even before that heart attack. He has a snowball's chance in hell today.

The REAL Detector wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

No.

We need whoever will put the fossil fuel companies out of business. Nothing else matters.

If that's Biden then fine. But I don't think he's the one who will do it.

Nutcase detected. ^

Absolutely correct, sir!

Military and police on Trump’s side wrote:

You want civil war, you democrat pieces of trash????

Bring it on!!!!

Military, police and gun owners are on our side!!!!

I’ll bite. I would train an army of fit gay guys to shoot like snipers and let them unleash their trump hatred on all your 300 pound hill billy gun carriers. Sorry, you would lose bigly.

agip wrote:

can't you non-biden people at least acknowledge that his moderate stance and lack of fiery demands for change...are exactly what the purple voters want? And that those are the people we need next year?

Biden's appeal.

He is male. (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar).

He is white. (Harris, Booker.)

He is straight. (Buttigeig.)

He is not a socialist. (Sanders.)

He is not a political novice. (Yang, Steyer.)

That's pretty inspiring. ::Yawn.::

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Nobody wants a Civil War, and you shouldn't either.

Also, you are delusional if you think the Military would back Trump if he's removed. Finally, there are lots of liberal cops and gun owners. I realize you are just trolling, but that in and of itself doesn't keep me from responding.

If Trump gains control of the military he would become a de facto dictator. He would demolish the NYT and WAPO buildings, send all Democrat politicions to reeducation camps except for Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff and the Squad whom would all be hung upside down at a gas station.

That would be the first day of a 100 day "cleansing" program.

We have another nutcase. The dumbest statement ever written on this thread.

Read it and weep democrats.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/06/donald-trump-2020-election-poll-066158

Winning!

KAG2020

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Bernie has no chance?

Correct. Crazy Bernie had no chance even before that heart attack. He has a snowball's chance in hell today.

Klobuchar is my favorite. She has a great resume, attended Yale and the University of Chicago law school, is moderate and is significantly younger than the three geezers. I also believe she would have the best chance of beating Trump. It's frustrating she can't get past 1-2%.

Just Another LRC Idiot wrote:

agip wrote:

can't you non-biden people at least acknowledge that his moderate stance and lack of fiery demands for change...are exactly what the purple voters want? And that those are the people we need next year?

Biden's appeal.

He is male. (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar).

He is white. (Harris, Booker.)

He is straight. (Buttigeig.)

He is not a socialist. (Sanders.)

He is not a political novice. (Yang, Steyer.)

That's pretty inspiring. ::Yawn.::

His appeal is that he is polling stronger in the key battleground states that will decide the election. That’s his appeal, the why is less important. Although polls suggest that issues such as Warrens health care plan and student loan forgiveness are unpopular in those states.

Racket wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Nothing dumber than you swallowing the Clownpole's nonsense every single day.

Flagpole is basically the 21 year old philosophy major that hangs out in the library and steps out frequently to smoke and wax poetic on whatever Wittgenstein book they've recently half read to a crowd of starry eyed freshman.

Hardly.

Trollminator wrote:

Ken Tucky wrote:

In the news:

Kentucky GOP considering challenging the governor election and allowing the GOP Senate to chose a "winner." Essentially, the GOP is claiming a Democrat cannot win in Kentucky unless there are "voting irregularities." The GOP Senate gets to define what that mean.

The GOP is now resorting to overturning a legal election and claiming their loser is the "winner."

https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/06/beshear-vs-bevin-legislature-could-decide-race-senate-president-says/4174103002/https://theweek.com/speedreads/876686/kentuckys-republican-senate-president-says-gopled-legislature-may-pick-next-governor

Sally - take note, this is what an overturned election would look like

Oh man. That is crazy. Big lawsuits if that happens.

Nope Purrzzz wrote:

Racket wrote:

People prefer divided government more than the alternative. It's a fact, and I suspect you've consumed high quantities of lead and/or mercury from a young age.

Hey, thanks for doubling down on stupid.

I post proof, logic and analysis to back up what is clearly true.

You post absolutely ZERO content.

Go ahead and show me where most people vote for divided government. Or just keeping piling up stupid. Your call, chief.

I'd say don't make me laugh but it's far too late for that. I love how your "proof," "logic," and "analysis" is nothing better than basic uninformed opinions. You couldn't be further beneath me, but I applaud your infantile effort to keep up.

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

Flagpole is basically the 21 year old philosophy major that hangs out in the library and steps out frequently to smoke and wax poetic on whatever Wittgenstein book they've recently half read to a crowd of starry eyed freshman.

Hardly.

22 years old?

And who retires to southern California? Everyone knows a real man isn't afraid of enduring a little winter. Builds character.

agip wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

No.

We need whoever will put the fossil fuel companies out of business. Nothing else matters.

If that's Biden then fine. But I don't think he's the one who will do it.

seriously? Fats you are a single-issue voter?

On an issue that cannot be accomplished in our capitalist democracy?

really, seriously?

Yes. Seriously.

I've never been a single issue voter in my entire life. But that has changed.

All of humanity depends on what we do in the next ten years. The climate crisis is the only issue that matters any more.