He's on the case. Bye Bye Donnie!
He's on the case. Bye Bye Donnie!
Rand Paul wishes media would out whistleblower. He would do it himself, but he’s a coward.
For the majority of trumpanzees who are illiterate.
https://video.vanityfair.com/watch/anthony-scaramucci-s-impeachment-predictions-2019-10-22
The mooooch wrote:
He's on the case. Bye Bye Donnie!
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/469010-scaramucci-now-says-trump-will-be-gone-by-march-instead-of-end-of
I'm not willing to call March as the time, but I agree with him that he won't make it to the end of this term. He is going to go to prison too once out of office...unless of course he dies before the process is complete or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it.
I do have this concern...that once he is removed that his health has a precipitous decline. He is fueled by his ego and false sense of importance, and once some reality hits (if he's even capable of accepting reality), he might fall apart quickly and die. I do not want that to happen. I would rather he spend some time in prison for what he's done.
agip wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
I think it's better to seem to be behind going into the race... complacency is not a friend
you'd rather be trump right now? 11 points back in the polls? That's not a good result in any fashion.
I would shave off 5 points to be conservative. Trump may behind in the polls but he is fully confident almost all of his base is going to show up. We don't have that level of confidence on the left. I'd rather be the party with most incentive to unite and fight. They are consolidating their support behind agent orange.
agip wrote:
X-Runner wrote:
If Trump was leading in these polls he'd be bragging about it.
Instead he says they are fake or wrong.
Now to his credit, he did trail in all of the polls right up to the day he was elected.
Clinton was up 3% over Trump in the final polls. Which is within the margin of error. The current 10 points is not within the margin of error and shows an actual large lead for the Ds. Although if you add the MOE to the built in advantage Rs have in the electoral college, it gets closer.
I wonder more and more if his hard shift to the right instead of center is going to pay off. He could win with less than 46% of the general vote, but not much less. It's a game of calibration across the battleground states and Dems pushing wild ideas is only going to spook those critical voters.
Rigged gets owned wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Not that it matters that much but you might want read up about domestic extremist violence before proclaiming some sort of victory.
“In the last 10 years when you look at murders committed by domestic extremists in the United States of all types, right wing extremists are responsible for about 74 percent of those murders.”
https://www.npr.org/2017/06/16/533255619/fact-check-is-left-wing-violence-risinghttps://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/homegrown-terrorists-2018-were-almost-all-right-wing/581284/https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/05/27/530351468/2-dead-1-injured-after-stabbing-in-portland-ore
Nope. I own all of you triggered libs & NeverTrumpers. You will all be crying in despair next year. Your socialist dem candidates are clowns.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1190482433394692096https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/the-rise-of-the-violent-left/534192/https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/350524-antifa-activists-say-violence-is-necessaryhttps://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2019/09/04/antifa-thought-get-away-violence-bostons-straight-pride-parade-judge-ruining-day/https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/09/01/call-antifa-what-they-are-domestic-terrorists/X-Runner wrote:
My feeling is that Trump really has no chance at winning again.
So the Democratic candidate's electability doesn't matter.
but if too many dems think this way its game over due to complacency
I think you’re supposed to show mass shootings by antifa. As much as you guys lie, it shouldn’t be too hard.
Trigged, we can all post individual examples and incidents till we are blue in the face but the numbers and statistics included in the initial articles I provided did prove you wrong. You originally stated that there was more violent attacks from the left then the right. Statistically that just isn’t even nearly true.
Again all that violence is wrong.
Flagpole wrote:
The mooooch wrote:
He's on the case. Bye Bye Donnie!
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/469010-scaramucci-now-says-trump-will-be-gone-by-march-instead-of-end-ofI'm not willing to call March as the time, but I agree with him that he won't make it to the end of this term. He is going to go to prison too once out of office...unless of course he dies before the process is complete or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it.
I do have this concern...that once he is removed that his health has a precipitous decline. He is fueled by his ego and false sense of importance, and once some reality hits (if he's even capable of accepting reality), he might fall apart quickly and die. I do not want that to happen. I would rather he spend some time in prison for what he's done.
I am afraid we can't have both. The way things look now it will be either impeachment or jail, unless, and this is a huge unless, Pelosi defaulted to POTUS with a Pence impeachment and Congress refusing to approve another VP appointment. If Dems impeach there is almost no question Pence will pardon Trump, and a pardon will be treated as enough punishment... sure we would hear about a legal violation here and there in his post president life but he wouldn't be thrown in jail. If they don't impeach and he loses next year everyone will distance themselves from him and will be happy to hang him as the scapegoat. He would go to jail on one or some of the charges in that case. The only wiggle room I can see is if GOP starts to suffer so badly in the polls that they would turn on him. I believe the current growth in americans supporting impeachment is more due to additional Dems getting behind it. I don't think republican voters will ever get behind it enough.
Shaggy DA wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
I'm no different from the Clownpole, I always post as RFH and people ARE leaving CA.
You are a liar. You posted as another username to praise your own post. Loser.
You know, when so many people tell you how stupid and crazy you are, you might want to consider they are right.
Just wanted to remind everyone of just how stupid this guy Trigged is (thanks Ciro). Fumbled a confirmatory post to himself. He is from a hill billy state after all.
Trigged is wrong about Cali, too. Population is steady, instead of previously rapid growth. Property value remains high, so people sprawl out into remote areas, where they’re vulnerable to forest fires.
No one doubts that Cali is near its limit, but it’s not the economy or politics. More like the climate crisis, water diversion, and the need to (gasp!) preserve some of the land for its natural value.
trumper sondland had to go back and revise his testimony.
now he says there was a clear quid pro quo and he was ordered to put it in clear terms to the ukranians.
1) in 10 minutes sondland will be tossed under the bus, called a nevertrumper and found to be a donor to some democrat's campaign.
2) Trumpers are lying to congress.
3) the Rs are trying to focus all attention on the whistleblower when he or she is utterly irrelevant now.
4) anyone who says there was no quid pro quo is full of it.
WASHINGTON — A critical witness in the impeachment inquiry offered Congress substantial new testimony this week, revealing that he told a top Ukrainian official that the country likely would not receive American military aid unless it publicly committed to investigations President Trump wanted.
The disclosure from Gordon D. Sondland, the United States ambassador to the European Union, in four new pages of sworn testimony released on Tuesday, confirmed his involvement in essentially laying out a quid pro quo to Ukraine that he had previously not acknowledged.
For what it's worth, Obama solicited help from Russia for his re-election campaign a number of years ago, so he is far from the only president to seek assistance from a foreign power in getting elected / re-elected. Here is his quid pro quo moment:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/26/obama-medvedev-space-nuclear
Notice how he dangled a missile treaty in front of the Russians in exchange for help from Putin in his reelection campaign?
This is Iggy and Riggy's guy. A bad extortionist who's too stupid to realize he's being played. Then again, I guess his followers are just as stupid.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/opinion/trump-ukraine.html
comedyrelief wrote:
For what it's worth, Obama solicited help from Russia for his re-election campaign a number of years ago, so he is far from the only president to seek assistance from a foreign power in getting elected / re-elected. Here is his quid pro quo moment:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/26/obama-medvedev-space-nuclearNotice how he dangled a missile treaty in front of the Russians in exchange for help from Putin in his reelection campaign?
Good love you.
God*
Sondland!!! Ratted out trump pence pompeo & rudy...