Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sure you can, because the number of electors are apportioned based upon the number of representatives and senators in each state. Electors in some states have the ability to vote their conscience. Again the electoral votes are controlled by states. Thus geographical differences are accounted for. In this case the two heavily populated coasts can’t necessarily dominate the center.

Sally Vix wrote:

hand counts wrote:

Allowing a minority to have control over a majority, as Ghost claims, is pure ignorance.

Please elaborate on the above sentence because it makes no sense. Read it again because it just makes no sense. Allowing a minority to have control over a majority is pure ignorance.? Come on dude - proofread your stuff before you post!

Retard. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority

agip wrote:

Racket wrote:

Yes, I agree. But the for the part that I bolded, those aren't mutually exclusive.

10-4

Biden is done. Warren will likely be the nominee.

We’ve come full circle from trump’s drama & arrogance, to the drama of impeaching trump & humbling the traitors. Who knows, we may even start on minimum wage/healthcare/safety net?

Unlike trump, the astros actually have a chance.

hand counts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Please elaborate on the above sentence because it makes no sense. Read it again because it just makes no sense. Allowing a minority to have control over a majority is pure ignorance.? Come on dude - proofread your stuff before you post!

Retard. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority

LOL ... Sister Sally is not the brightest tool in the shed. :-)

Democrats love terrorists!!!!

hand counts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Please elaborate on the above sentence because it makes no sense. Read it again because it just makes no sense. Allowing a minority to have control over a majority is pure ignorance.? Come on dude - proofread your stuff before you post!

Retard. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority

The irony of you calling me a retard (which I would never call anyone) ... Do you know what the word "ignorance" means? It means unaware. So the sentence is this ... "Allowing a minority to have control over a majority is pure unaware." How idiotic does that sound? Now, I would never call you a retard like you called me but you might want to spend a bit more time learning stuff, especially english.

Polly Plumper wrote:

hand counts wrote:

Retard. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority

LOL ... Sister Sally is not the brightest tool in the shed. :-)

Read my response. This poster was hooked, lined and sunk!

Agree, when I was single, Barb Wire was a thing. She was rich, too.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

agip wrote:

10-4

Biden is done. Warren will likely be the nominee.

the numbers do not show this at all.

the numbers show biden holding on to his lead and lately increasing it.

that said, he's going to lose iA and NH. So the question will be if that will sap his strength so he loses SC NV and Super Tuesday. But biden has basically given up on IA - not happening for him.

natioanlly biden hasn't lost a step.

Sally Vix wrote:

Whine ... whine ... whine

^ RETARD

Retard [Sally Vix]. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority[/quote]

Sally: Read my response. This poster was hooked, lined and sunk![/quote]

You really cannot see that "majority could not control" is equal to "minority can control"

OK. Biden seems incoherent at times, and he is struggling with funding. That said he is more centrist, and probably will be more of a caretaker/figurehead, and if he becomes the nominee will certainly select a woman as a running mate. Warren scares Wall Street which is one reason I like her.

Polly Plumper wrote:

Retard [Sally Vix]. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority

Sally: Read my response. This poster was hooked, lined and sunk![/quote]

You really cannot see that "majority could not control" is equal to "minority can control"[/quote]

Polly, Sally has a 3.99 undergraduate GPA. Maybe you missed those posts?

Polly Plumper wrote:

Retard [Sally Vix]. Learn to READ AND COMPREHEND.

Ghost: so the majority could not control the states

Reply: Allowing a minority to have control over a majority

Sally: Read my response. This poster was hooked, lined and sunk![/quote]

You really cannot see that "majority could not control" is equal to "minority can control"[/quote]

I am not talking about that! I am talking about how "ignorance" was used. Just supremely wrong. How many times do I have to dumb-down my responses to you? Think! It gets old correctly you multiple times. Should just be once and done with it but you clowns keep me having to clarifying stuff. Think!

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

OK. Biden seems incoherent at times, and he is struggling with funding. That said he is more centrist, and probably will be more of a caretaker/figurehead, and if he becomes the nominee will certainly select a woman as a running mate. Warren scares Wall Street which is one reason I like her.

Biden with a black female VP would be unstoppable.

Biden isn't the sharpest tool in the shed and he's not in touch withe tip of the spear dem politics...but that's what people like about him. Obama 2 sounds pretty good to the majority of the country.

I'm hoping biden wins - we need a calm four years. Biden won't tear apart the country.

wall street certainly does not like warren no

agip wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

OK. Biden seems incoherent at times, and he is struggling with funding. That said he is more centrist, and probably will be more of a caretaker/figurehead, and if he becomes the nominee will certainly select a woman as a running mate. Warren scares Wall Street which is one reason I like her.

Biden with a black female VP would be unstoppable.

Biden isn't the sharpest tool in the shed and he's not in touch withe tip of the spear dem politics...but that's what people like about him. Obama 2 sounds pretty good to the majority of the country.

I'm hoping biden wins - we need a calm four years. Biden won't tear apart the country.

wall street certainly does not like warren no

agip, the Democratic candidate will already get 90-plus% of the black vote. Having Biden with a black VP candidate (let's say Harris) will not pull in more black voters. Perhaps a few. But how many white voters (and I would say this is wrongly) will vote against merely because of the black VP candidate?

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

Biden with a black female VP would be unstoppable.

Biden isn't the sharpest tool in the shed and he's not in touch withe tip of the spear dem politics...but that's what people like about him. Obama 2 sounds pretty good to the majority of the country.

I'm hoping biden wins - we need a calm four years. Biden won't tear apart the country.

wall street certainly does not like warren no

agip, the Democratic candidate will already get 90-plus% of the black vote. Having Biden with a black VP candidate (let's say Harris) will not pull in more black voters. Perhaps a few. But how many white voters (and I would say this is wrongly) will vote against merely because of the black VP candidate?

it's all about turnout. If HRC had come even a little closer to Obama's black voter turnout in Milwaukee, Phila, Detroit...she'd be president. So yeah 90+% of black voters will vote D...so they simply need more black voters.

dems have more to gain from black turnout than losses from white turnout. But yeah it's a bit of a balancing act in the suburbs.

White trump voters will vote against black candidates, candidates named Black, candidates with black dogs, candidates who know any blacks, etc.