Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Only 15 but I peruse it from time and time.
Only proves that you don't understand what you read.
But you already knew Sally is a certified dumbazz
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Only 15 but I peruse it from time and time.
Only proves that you don't understand what you read.
But you already knew Sally is a certified dumbazz
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Only 15 but I peruse it from time and time.
Only proves that you don't understand what you read.
I am still looking up "emoluments" in the dictionary! Slow down a bit!
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
That is correct, but that is NOT what is happening here. They've only been interviewing witnesses for 2 weeks. It is going at a rapid pace. The House has said it isn't even going to play the game of waiting for judges to weigh in on those who refuse their subpoenas. The House is moving with purpose and swiftness.
Are you kidding me? They have only been interviewing witnesses for 2 weeks??? Are you really kidding me? The House has had 6 committees - 6! - investigating Trump for like 6 months. What the eff have those 6 committees been doing for the last 6 months? They have not interviewed any witnesses? Only interviews for 2 weeks. Pelosi is not slow walking this crock - this "inquiry" is the biggest hoax ever. No impeachment is going to happen. Interviewing witness for 2 weeks when 6 committees have been investigating it for 6 months. What the eff have they been doing?
^ a certified dumbazz with zero experience reading or understanding anything
Repukes wrote:
As compared to the Republican House constipation with Bill Clinton.
Investigation start: Jan 1994 (Whitewater)
DELAY BY REPUBLICANS: 4 YEAR AND 9 MONTHS
-- Lewinsky starts White House: Nov 1995; leaves 6 months later
Change Investigation to Lewinsky: Jan 1998 (Whitewater = Nothingburger)
Impeachment start: Oct 1998
Impeachment by the Republican House: December 1998 (because Lewinsky)
Nearly FIVE YEARS spend by Republicans looking for something, and picking something to impeach that occurred AFTER their original goal poofed (Whitewater).
LOL . . . The Repubs spent nearly five years having closed to the public, and closed to most of the House, closed meeting trying to figure out what to impeach Clinton for. . . . . what a bunch of tools.
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
That is correct, but that is NOT what is happening here. They've only been interviewing witnesses for 2 weeks. It is going at a rapid pace. The House has said it isn't even going to play the game of waiting for judges to weigh in on those who refuse their subpoenas. The House is moving with purpose and swiftness.
Are you kidding me? They have only been interviewing witnesses for 2 weeks??? Are you really kidding me? The House has had 6 committees - 6! - investigating Trump for like 6 months. What the eff have those 6 committees been doing for the last 6 months? They have not interviewed any witnesses? Only interviews for 2 weeks. Pelosi is not slow walking this crock - this "inquiry" is the biggest hoax ever. No impeachment is going to happen. Interviewing witness for 2 weeks when 6 committees have been investigating it for 6 months. What the eff have they been doing?
Dude, I know you are part troll, but you are driven by your stupidity. They have only been interviewing witnesses to the Ukraine situation for about 2 weeks. There was a chance the House wasn't going to pursue Impeachment before the Ukraine info hit, and that left it with no choice. That this inquiry is a "hoax" doesn't even make sense.
He will be impeached...FOR SURE. You are a fool and an idiot. I wish that weren't the case, but it is.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1189271494100242432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fgop-reps-say-schiff-stopped-impeachment-witness-from-answering-certain-gop-questionsFair process?
?
Yes. A judge has already determined that the way the House is going about this process is legal. The GOP is the reason the process is as it is, so it needs to stop complaining.
Elections have consequences, and the House right now is run by Democrats.
For the millionth time, when the facts are not on your side, you argue the process. The facts are not on your side. You support a criminal President. Shame on you.
Da Truf wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Only proves that you don't understand what you read.
But you already knew Sally is a certified dumbazz
Sally is stupid, and stupid in a very very deep way. The fact that he says he has read the Constitution 15 times and yet doesn't understand what it says is PROOF of already declared stupidity.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Are you kidding me? They have only been interviewing witnesses for 2 weeks??? Are you really kidding me? The House has had 6 committees - 6! - investigating Trump for like 6 months. What the eff have those 6 committees been doing for the last 6 months? They have not interviewed any witnesses? Only interviews for 2 weeks. Pelosi is not slow walking this crock - this "inquiry" is the biggest hoax ever. No impeachment is going to happen. Interviewing witness for 2 weeks when 6 committees have been investigating it for 6 months. What the eff have they been doing?
Dude, I know you are part troll, but you are driven by your stupidity. They have only been interviewing witnesses to the Ukraine situation for about 2 weeks. There was a chance the House wasn't going to pursue Impeachment before the Ukraine info hit, and that left it with no choice. That this inquiry is a "hoax" doesn't even make sense.
He will be impeached...FOR SURE. You are a fool and an idiot. I wish that weren't the case, but it is.
The Ukrainian stuff came out much longer than 2 weeks. Pelosi announced the impeachment inquiry much longer than 2 weeks. Perhaps it is YOU who is the fool and an idiot. I am not even sure why I responded to you. I normally don't get in the dirt with people like you. BANNED!!!!!!
On further thought - I feel filthy even responding to you. Just filthy. I will go take a shower to get that filth off of me. Do not EVER send anything to me. You have a track record of 0-54. That is not stellar. To summarize, QUIT THE EFF SENDING ME ANY MESSAGES. I will go shower now.
Sally Vix wrote:
On further thought - I feel filthy even responding to you. Just filthy. I will go take a shower to get that filth off of me. Do not EVER send anything to me. You have a track record of 0-54. That is not stellar. To summarize, QUIT THE EFF SENDING ME ANY MESSAGES. I will go shower now.
^a VERY mentally challenged troll
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Dude, I know you are part troll, but you are driven by your stupidity. They have only been interviewing witnesses to the Ukraine situation for about 2 weeks. There was a chance the House wasn't going to pursue Impeachment before the Ukraine info hit, and that left it with no choice. That this inquiry is a "hoax" doesn't even make sense.
He will be impeached...FOR SURE. You are a fool and an idiot. I wish that weren't the case, but it is.
The Ukrainian stuff came out much longer than 2 weeks. Pelosi announced the impeachment inquiry much longer than 2 weeks. Perhaps it is YOU who is the fool and an idiot. I am not even sure why I responded to you. I normally don't get in the dirt with people like you. BANNED!!!!!!
Ah Simple Sally...the day Pelosi announced the inquiry and the first witness testimony were not the same day...the first witness testimony didn't begin the minute she announced the inquiry...it's been about 2 weeks as I said. Yovanovitch was the first witness to testify, and that was Oct. 11, so 18 days from when I say about 2 weeks. I'd say 18 days is "about 2 weeks".
I have no idea how many times you have "banned" me, but you should stop doing that because we both know you can't keep your word on that. What you should really do is ban yourself from this thread, because it really is beyond you.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole - you just convinced me..
Well, you are incorrect. The House will impeach him FOR SURE. That "fricking phone call" was a call in which he broke the law. That "fricking phone call" was the call that inspired the whistle blower to come forward. It was just the genesis of Trump's downfall. He then went on to not only admit he broke the law, but he actively broke the law on camera when he asked for Ukraine and then China to investigate the Bidens. Demanding justice isn't being a crybaby. Demanding justice is patriotic. Demanding justice is right. Demanding justice is moral.
For Sally:
Clinton WILL not be impeached. Because of a fricking affair. NO - you Conservatives have been trying for 5 years to get him. The affair is the latest BS - I am really fricking tired of your stuff. Clinton is going nowhere. He is here for the remaining part of his presidency. just accept it. Don't be little crybabies
Alan
Sadly, your sarcasm may be too subtle for these clowns.
Congrats to our military, though. Vindman in full dress was more impressive than even the most honored civilian. And he wasn’t shy about making a liar out of Sondland & trump.
And Moscow Mitch earned his traitor purple heart with an Improvised Expressive Device: “I won’t question Vindman’s patriotism.”
Well, THANK YOU vladimir!
under the covers wrote:
Repukes wrote:
As compared to the Republican House constipation with Bill Clinton.
Investigation start: Jan 1994 (Whitewater)
DELAY BY REPUBLICANS: 4 YEAR AND 9 MONTHS
-- Lewinsky starts White House: Nov 1995; leaves 6 months later
Change Investigation to Lewinsky: Jan 1998 (Whitewater = Nothingburger)
Impeachment start: Oct 1998
Impeachment by the Republican House: December 1998 (because Lewinsky)
Nearly FIVE YEARS spend by Republicans looking for something, and picking something to impeach that occurred AFTER their original goal poofed (Whitewater).
LOL . . . The Repubs spent nearly five years having closed to the public, and closed to most of the House, closed meeting trying to figure out what to impeach Clinton for. . . . . what a bunch of tools.
And his big crime was when they asked him under oath if he cheated on his wife, and guess, what he lied.
How would Trump stand up to that scrutiny?
Vindman's honesty, integrity, and patriotism not only put a nail in Trump's coffin but humiliated by comparison all those Republicans who lied and put devotion to Trump ahead of country.
God he makes them look bad.
Conundrum wrote:
Vindman's honesty, integrity, and patriotism not only put a nail in Trump's coffin but humiliated by comparison all those Republicans who lied and put devotion to Trump ahead of country.
God he makes them look bad.
Won't matter a whit to a *very* large portion of Trump's people.
1) They don't follow the news anyway. Or, to the extent a few of them do, they know the news is fake because it keeps saying bad things about Trump.
2) Vindman is a "foreigner"--after all, he made the unwise choice to be born outside the United States. Come on, testimony from a refugee?
3) Vindman is a Jew. A Jew's word against DJT's? Please.
4) Vindman is NOT Donald Trump. True Trump loyalists will not listen to (or at least not assimilate) anything or anyone whose words might threaten Trump's presidency. It's a religious position: They *cannot* be wrong in supporting DJT, and so anyone who speaks against him *must* be.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
“It is imprecise to say this city is divided over Trump. It is rather almost solidly united behind what millions of Middle Americans believe to be a deep state-media conspiracy to overturn the 2016 election and effect a coup d’etat against a president whom this city detests but fears it cannot defeat in 2020.”
—Patrick J. Buchanan
Inauguration: 1/2017; current date: 10/2019.
Slowest. Moving. Coup. D'état. EVER.
Impeachment Halloween Haunted House:
“Opened the lid, Ghost shook his fist /
And said, Vatever happent to my Transylvania Twist? /
It’s now the Mash!”
Gravy, anyone?
jesseriley wrote:
Impeachment Halloween Haunted House:
“Opened the lid, Ghost shook his fist /
And said, Vatever happent to my Transylvania Twist? /
It’s now the Mash!”
Gravy, anyone?
Not your best Flagpole.