itsbaddude wrote:
Why would they not cooperate with the investigation?
Dem state officials refusing to cooperate with Trump voter fraud probe
Funny how fox news didn't report Republican States telling him to go jump in a lake.
itsbaddude wrote:
Why would they not cooperate with the investigation?
Dem state officials refusing to cooperate with Trump voter fraud probe
Funny how fox news didn't report Republican States telling him to go jump in a lake.
itsbaddude wrote:
John Podesta has ties to the Kremlin.
There's no party affiliation to getting into some cool investment schemes. I can't help you if you can't imagine how basic Statecraft works.
Back at the White House, staff leaking at greater and more detailed level than ever. Not fake news.
Trump won't release tax returns...voters info protected by constitution but that won't matter to you Trump nazis.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
itsbaddude wrote:Why would they not cooperate with the investigation?
Dem state officials refusing to cooperate with Trump voter fraud probe
Funny how fox news didn't report Republican States telling him to go jump in a lake.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
itsbaddude wrote:Why would they not cooperate with the investigation?
Dem state officials refusing to cooperate with Trump voter fraud probe
Funny how fox news didn't report Republican States telling him to go jump in a lake.
Funny how you didn't mention that Kentucky was in that article. Furthermore, there are more red states listed today.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/01/trump-chides-states-for-not-complying-with-voting-commission-what-are-trying-to-hide.htmlHow do you know they are fantasy? An investigation of this type has never been done. Don't you want to find out once and for all if the allegation are true?Are you in favor of illegals voting?I predict that many votes for democrats will disappear in 2018, especially in California.
Fentrekker wrote:
itsbaddude wrote:Why would they not cooperate with the investigation? Are they trying to hide something? Don't we want to get to the bottom of this issue once and for all? I don't understand how anyone approves of breaking the law.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/30/dem-state-officials-refusing-to-cooperate-with-trump-voter-fraud-probe.htmlBecause they know it is not a bona fide investigation. Because unlike you they know Trumps allegations are fantasy. Because they know the coming assault on voting rights begins with this sort of bs.
Trump's tax information is personal and not publicly available.Here is some more information for you low information pot smokers.Kobach's request says the panel seeks only "publicly available" information. Basic information about California voters is routinely shared with journalists, political campaigns and researchers after a written request and payment of a fee.The letter asks for data including "information regarding any felony convictions, information regarding voter registration in another state, information regarding military status, and overseas citizen information."http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-california-s-top-elections-officer-1498771356-htmlstory.html
Sexfighter wrote:
Trump won't release tax returns...voters info protected by constitution but that won't matter to you Trump nazis.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:Funny how fox news didn't report Republican States telling him to go jump in a lake.
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
still waiting wrote:
He was "wearing a wearing a"?
Please, get your falsehoods together more coherently.
Older and wiser wrote:Maybe he didn't report his brilliant deductions to the police because he feared they wouldn't take him seriously just because he was wearing a wearing a tin foil hat
Wow, you found a typo!
Way to go!
For some odd reason, the states think it's a bad idea to give out names, party affiliation, voting record, and social security numbers of every voter in America.In some cases, it's against state law to do so.But yea, I'm sure all those Republican governors are hiding something from Trump.
itsbaddude wrote:
Why would they not cooperate with the investigation? Are they trying to hide something? Don't we want to get to the bottom of this issue once and for all? I don't understand how anyone approves of breaking the law.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/30/dem-state-officials-refusing-to-cooperate-with-trump-voter-fraud-probe.html
I never watch CNN. It's purely my own analysis.
itsbaddude wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDpslaGUMAEv50T.jpgFat hurts wrote:Evidence of collusion is starting to come out. But it will still be easier to nail Trump for financial crimes.
Joe Scarborough claims to have proof of a blackmail attempt by the Trump administration. This story is about as Nixonian as you can get.
It's pretty obvious that Trump has tried to obstruct justice. He already admitted to that one.
Will any of this result in impeachment?
This boils down to how long Republicans in congress want to put up with all this. They aren't getting much done in their effort to lower taxes on the wealthy and that's in large part because Trump keeps getting in the way. They aren't getting much else done either.
At some point Republicans have to decide if they want to blame Trump for all their failures. If so, they will impeach him and try to convince voters that the Trump agenda can be better served under President Pence. That argument would have the advantage of being true. But voters have to keep Republicans in power for it to work.
Also, it will be hard to get enough congressional Republicans to go along with a plan like that. After Obamacare "repeal and replace" finally fails in August, look to see if they try to blame Trump for the failure. That will tell us a lot about what happens next. Any impeachment effort would need to start in earnest before the end of the year.
For a number of reasons, I don't think any of that will actually happen. But I do think it's going to become clear that impeachment is the best shot Republicans have for ending Obamacare and lowering taxes.
So you are scared to go to the police? You have evidence of murders yet you are too scared to tell anyone?What a sorry excuse for a citizen you are.As a matter of fact, withholding evidence of murder is a crime. You are nothing but a sleazy criminal!
The Truth Hurt Old Man wrote:
people who spoke about it were killed. the police were on his payroll. you put the dots together old man and try to figure out why anyone would go to the police.
brilliant finding? no, they are facts as I've read up on the story several times. regardless, they are no less brilliant than the lies that you post on a daily basis and try to convince others are factual but are in reality fake news. keep digging as you only look more ignorant with each link that you post. the majority of the board is laughing at you.
Fat hurts wrote:The entire law enforcement community of the United States is also too biased or ignorant to put the dots together.
Why haven't you gone to the police and reported your brilliant findings?
Libs just love it when illegal aliens sneak over here, collect gov benefits, hide in sanctuary cities and vote democrat which is especially rampant in California.
I've provided my opinion and analysis. Nobody (including you) has pointed out anything I said that was a lie. I deal in facts and opinion. I'll leave the lies to others.
still waiting wrote:
Your entire post is bullish*t. The guy hasn't been in for a year and you've made up more lies about him than the Clintons did in one day...and that's a lot. Is anyone on here a marine biologist? You are a peabrain and have no family.
Fat hurts wrote:Evidence of collusion is starting to come out. But it will still be easier to nail Trump for financial crimes.
Joe Scarborough claims to have proof of a blackmail attempt by the Trump administration. This story is about as Nixonian as you can get.
It's pretty obvious that Trump has tried to obstruct justice. He already admitted to that one.
Will any of this result in impeachment?
This boils down to how long Republicans in congress want to put up with all this. They aren't getting much done in their effort to lower taxes on the wealthy and that's in large part because Trump keeps getting in the way. They aren't getting much else done either.
At some point Republicans have to decide if they want to blame Trump for all their failures. If so, they will impeach him and try to convince voters that the Trump agenda can be better served under President Pence. That argument would have the advantage of being true. But voters have to keep Republicans in power for it to work.
Also, it will be hard to get enough congressional Republicans to go along with a plan like that. After Obamacare "repeal and replace" finally fails in August, look to see if they try to blame Trump for the failure. That will tell us a lot about what happens next. Any impeachment effort would need to start in earnest before the end of the year.
For a number of reasons, I don't think any of that will actually happen. But I do think it's going to become clear that impeachment is the best shot Republicans have for ending Obamacare and lowering taxes.
Since I registered "Fat hurts", I've never posted under any other name.But I'm kind of honored. This is the first time I've been accused of this. It's kind of an LRC rite of passage, huh?The way you can tell FitzyXC is not me is because I never confuse "its" and "it's". I might make the occasional grammatical error, but not that one.
Mirrorman Jackson wrote:
You just described the Left to a T, thank you so much. The Right posts a fact and the Left says NO, that's not true. FitzyXC and Fat Hurts are the same poster. Do you guys sleep thru the night after such a devastating loss last November? It's obviously really gotten to you.
FitzyXC wrote:baddude immediately dismissing news sources he doesn't agree with then immediately pimping NY Post, Fox News, Brietbart, et al. content is hilarious. Self-selected news at it's finest.
itsbaddude wrote:
How do you know they are fantasy? An investigation of this type has never been done.
Wrong. Investigations of this type have been done to death. The largest was during the George W. Bush administration.
George W. Bush spent 5 years and $1.4 million dollars searching for voter fraud. They found virtually nothing.
Fox News Reported:
Texas Attorney General Gregg Abbott, a Republican, launched an investigation in 2005 to uncover what he called an "epidemic" of voter fraud. But reviews of Abbott's investigation two years later yielded no cases of voter impersonation fraud. A Dallas Morning News review in 2008 found the 26 cases prosecuted were all against Democrats, most involved blacks and Hispanics, and typically involved people who helped elderly voters with mail-in ballots, but failed to follow state law by signing their names and addresses on the envelopes.
Abbot's investigation was paid for with a $1.4 million Justice Department crime-fighting grant.
After a five-year hunt for voter fraud, the Bush administration's Justice Department came up with little widespread fraud, finding mostly cases of people mistakenly filling out voter registration forms or voting when they didn't know they were ineligible, The New York Times reported in 2007. But none of the cases involved a person voting as someone else.
plop_plop!_v2.2.11 wrote:
Libs just love it when illegal aliens sneak over here, collect gov benefits, hide in sanctuary cities and vote democrat which is especially rampant in California.
Have any of those illegal aliens ever been charged or convicted?
If the problem is so widespread, why do they never get caught?
Your vote for Johnson was wasted. There is no middle ground, are you drunk? They all lie pal, every one of them. But as someone posted, the Clintons do it with such ease that it's scary (not the exact quote but you can look it up). With that said, Flagpole and others voted for Clinton but ignore her repeated lies and deny her ever doing any wrong doing, yet they attack Trump. He won because people got sick and tired of the Clintons and their shenanigans. Yeah, Pot to Kettle, wake up!
FitzyXC wrote:
Mirrorman Jackson wrote:You just described the Left to a T, thank you so much. The Right posts a fact and the Left says NO, that's not true. FitzyXC and Fat Hurts are the same poster. Do you guys sleep thru the night after such a devastating loss last November? It's obviously really gotten to you.
The point was Pot, Kettle. Both sides are the same. And I didn't vote for Clinton. I only briefly considered it after Obama's fiery DNC speech, also considered a write-in for Kasich, but ended up voting for Johnson. But because I disagree with you I must be one of "THEM" in the eternal "US against THEM" struggle. There is no middle ground.
Fat hurts wrote:
plop_plop!_v2.2.11 wrote:Libs just love it when illegal aliens sneak over here, collect gov benefits, hide in sanctuary cities and vote democrat which is especially rampant in California.
Have any of those illegal aliens ever been charged or convicted?
If the problem is so widespread, why do they never get caught?
Because you don't have to prove citizenship to become a registered voter in California, doofus.
I'll tell ya why. Once they get to Los Angeles they ARE safe, it is a sanctuary city!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They are safe and rarely touched there. Learn something, don't assume.MJ
Fat hurts wrote:
plop_plop!_v2.2.11 wrote:Libs just love it when illegal aliens sneak over here, collect gov benefits, hide in sanctuary cities and vote democrat which is especially rampant in California.
Have any of those illegal aliens ever been charged or convicted?
If the problem is so widespread, why do they never get caught?
Ah, you did a google search and quoted the NYT. Please point me to the investigation. There has never been an investigation. Bush did try to order the state department to investigate, but people refused and a scandal ensued. Typical leftist sh*t that has been going on ever since I can remember.There have been several estimates based on some surveys. Nothing really rigorous. The studies (being generous) that showed voter fraud are ridiculed by the left. The studies (being generous) that did not show "widespread" voter fraud are applauded by the left.
Fat hurts wrote:
itsbaddude wrote:How do you know they are fantasy? An investigation of this type has never been done.
Wrong. Investigations of this type have been done to death. The largest was during the George W. Bush administration.
George W. Bush spent 5 years and $1.4 million dollars searching for voter fraud. They found virtually nothing.
Fox News Reported:
Texas Attorney General Gregg Abbott, a Republican, launched an investigation in 2005 to uncover what he called an "epidemic" of voter fraud. But reviews of Abbott's investigation two years later yielded no cases of voter impersonation fraud. A Dallas Morning News review in 2008 found the 26 cases prosecuted were all against Democrats, most involved blacks and Hispanics, and typically involved people who helped elderly voters with mail-in ballots, but failed to follow state law by signing their names and addresses on the envelopes.
Abbot's investigation was paid for with a $1.4 million Justice Department crime-fighting grant.
After a five-year hunt for voter fraud, the Bush administration's Justice Department came up with little widespread fraud, finding mostly cases of people mistakenly filling out voter registration forms or voting when they didn't know they were ineligible, The New York Times reported in 2007. But none of the cases involved a person voting as someone else.
