Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

For Flagpole

-----------

My predictions never pan out, but I disappear when wrong

You're going down dickhead.

https://lawfareblog.com/time-i-got-recruited-collude-russians

Sexfighter wrote:

You're going down dickhead.

https://lawfareblog.com/time-i-got-recruited-collude-russians

LOL

Evidence of collusion is starting to come out. But it will still be easier to nail Trump for financial crimes.Joe Scarborough claims to have proof of a blackmail attempt by the Trump administration. This story is about as Nixonian as you can get.It's pretty obvious that Trump has tried to obstruct justice. He already admitted to that one.Will any of this result in impeachment?This boils down to how long Republicans in congress want to put up with all this. They aren't getting much done in their effort to lower taxes on the wealthy and that's in large part because Trump keeps getting in the way. They aren't getting much else done either.At some point Republicans have to decide if they want to blame Trump for all their failures. If so, they will impeach him and try to convince voters that the Trump agenda can be better served under President Pence. That argument would have the advantage of being true. But voters have to keep Republicans in power for it to work.Also, it will be hard to get enough congressional Republicans to go along with a plan like that. After Obamacare "repeal and replace" finally fails in August, look to see if they try to blame Trump for the failure. That will tell us a lot about what happens next. Any impeachment effort would need to start in earnest before the end of the year.For a number of reasons, I don't think any of that will actually happen. But I do think it's going to become clear that impeachment is the best shot Republicans have for ending Obamacare and lowering taxes.

Sexfighter wrote:

You're going down dickhead.

https://lawfareblog.com/time-i-got-recruited-collude-russians

Maybe he didn't report his brilliant deductions to the police because he feared they wouldn't take him seriously just because he was wearing a wearing a tin foil hat

Fat hurts wrote:

wait a minute there fella wrote:

It gets worse. You voted for a person who, along with her husband, are connected to dozens of murders. But you're either too biased or too ignorant to even put the dots together------dozens and dozens of coincidences, yeah right? Remember, the boys on the track, the lying medical examiner on Clinton's payroll, etc...you are one dense dude Fat Man!

The entire law enforcement community of the United States is also too biased or ignorant to put the dots together.

Why haven't you gone to the police and reported your brilliant findings?

Why would they not cooperate with the investigation? Are they trying to hide something? Don't we want to get to the bottom of this issue once and for all? I don't understand how anyone approves of breaking the law.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/30/dem-state-officials-refusing-to-cooperate-with-trump-voter-fraud-probe.html

John Podesta has ties to the Kremlin. With proof found in the wikileaks e-mails, yet he denies it like a good lying liberal.

Looks like Breitbart is more of a news organization that CNN or MSNBC.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/13/wikileaks-bombshell-john-podesta-owned-75000-shares-putin-connected-energy-company/

More quality work by Breitbart. More fake news retractions.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/30/fake-news-associated-press-engulfed-in-cnn-level-scandal-as-it-covers-up-invention-of-imaginary-pruitt-meeting/

Wait a minute, I thought Breitbart was fake news ?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/30/nyt-turns-out-17-intelligence-agencies-was-fake-news/

My favorite Trump interview. Winners Win!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaAID1DABck

people who spoke about it were killed. the police were on his payroll. you put the dots together old man and try to figure out why anyone would go to the police. brilliant finding? no, they are facts as I've read up on the story several times. regardless, they are no less brilliant than the lies that you post on a daily basis and try to convince others are factual but are in reality fake news. keep digging as you only look more ignorant with each link that you post. the majority of the board is laughing at you.

Fat hurts wrote:

wait a minute there fella wrote:

It gets worse. You voted for a person who, along with her husband, are connected to dozens of murders. But you're either too biased or too ignorant to even put the dots together------dozens and dozens of coincidences, yeah right? Remember, the boys on the track, the lying medical examiner on Clinton's payroll, etc...you are one dense dude Fat Man!

The entire law enforcement community of the United States is also too biased or ignorant to put the dots together.

Why haven't you gone to the police and reported your brilliant findings?

itsbaddude wrote:

Why would they not cooperate with the investigation? Are they trying to hide something? Don't we want to get to the bottom of this issue once and for all? I don't understand how anyone approves of breaking the law.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/30/dem-state-officials-refusing-to-cooperate-with-trump-voter-fraud-probe.html

Because they know it is not a bona fide investigation. Because unlike you they know Trumps allegations are fantasy. Because they know the coming assault on voting rights begins with this sort of bs.

Your entire post is bullish*t. The guy hasn't been in for a year and you've made up more lies about him than the Clintons did in one day...and that's a lot. Is anyone on here a marine biologist? You are a peabrain and have no family.

He was "wearing a wearing a"? Please, get your falsehoods together more coherently.

Older and wiser wrote:

Maybe he didn't report his brilliant deductions to the police because he feared they wouldn't take him seriously just because he was wearing a wearing a tin foil hat

Fat hurts wrote:

The entire law enforcement community of the United States is also too biased or ignorant to put the dots together.

Why haven't you gone to the police and reported your brilliant findings?

Libby's will look at your link and say "so what?". These liberals are so one-sided I feel sad for them. Honestly, dumb ignorant crybabies who LOST, HA, HA, HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

itsbaddude wrote:

John Podesta has ties to the Kremlin. With proof found in the wikileaks e-mails, yet he denies it like a good lying liberal.

Looks like Breitbart is more of a news organization that CNN or MSNBC.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/13/wikileaks-bombshell-john-podesta-owned-75000-shares-putin-connected-energy-company/

baddude immediately dismissing news sources he doesn't agree with then immediately pimping NY Post, Fox News, Brietbart, et al. content is hilarious. Self-selected news at it's finest.

You just described the Left to a T, thank you so much. The Right posts a fact and the Left says NO, that's not true. FitzyXC and Fat Hurts are the same poster. Do you guys sleep thru the night after such a devastating loss last November? It's obviously really gotten to you.

FitzyXC wrote:

baddude immediately dismissing news sources he doesn't agree with then immediately pimping NY Post, Fox News, Brietbart, et al. content is hilarious. Self-selected news at it's finest.

Mirrorman Jackson wrote:

You just described the Left to a T, thank you so much. The Right posts a fact and the Left says NO, that's not true. FitzyXC and Fat Hurts are the same poster. Do you guys sleep thru the night after such a devastating loss last November? It's obviously really gotten to you.

The point was Pot, Kettle. Both sides are the same. And I didn't vote for Clinton. I only briefly considered it after Obama's fiery DNC speech, also considered a write-in for Kasich, but ended up voting for Johnson. But because I disagree with you I must be one of "THEM" in the eternal "US against THEM" struggle. There is no middle ground.