Official Covid Vaccine thread

uhhhh.. wrote:

It's reaching a point where it's almost impossible to argue that this is anything but the worst-case scenario.

This is not corporate avarice or incompetence.

I'm afraid, with increasing evidence every day, that this is a mass-scale depopulation event.

The more we argue, bickering as 'vaccinated' vs 'unvaccinated,' or 'anti-vaxxers' vs 'vaxxers,' and so on, the more we play into their hands.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/very-urgent-do-covid-mrna-vaccines

https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwreck-of-all-trainwrecks-billions-of-people-stuck-with-a-broken-immune-response/

https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/philadelphia-2023

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IgG4-related_disease

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains

Covidiocy wrote:

uhhhh.. wrote:

It's reaching a point where it's almost impossible to argue that this is anything but the worst-case scenario.

This is not corporate avarice or incompetence.

I'm afraid, with increasing evidence every day, that this is a mass-scale depopulation event.

The more we argue, bickering as 'vaccinated' vs 'unvaccinated,' or 'anti-vaxxers' vs 'vaxxers,' and so on, the more we play into their hands.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/very-urgent-do-covid-mrna-vaccines

https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwreck-of-all-trainwrecks-billions-of-people-stuck-with-a-broken-immune-response/

https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/philadelphia-2023

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IgG4-related_disease

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/booster-caused-immune-tolerance-explains

The IgG4 hyperboosting is troubling. Could be seeing that in Japan. I warned about Japan early and often, that it could be a harbinger.

Harambe wrote:

Covidiocy wrote:

The IgG4 hyperboosting is troubling. Could be seeing that in Japan. I warned about Japan early and often, that it could be a harbinger.

IgG4 levels are not causative of IgG4 related disease. It’s one of the diagnostic markers but plenty of other things cause IgG4 antibodies to be raised. You have plenty of them inside you RIGHT NOW. PANIC!!!!

But of course you’re now agreeing with someone calling the vaccines a “mass depopulation event” so you’ve just completely lost it.

Covidiocy wrote:

Harambe wrote:

IgG4 levels are not causative of IgG4 related disease. It’s one of the diagnostic markers but plenty of other things cause IgG4 antibodies to be raised. You have plenty of them inside you RIGHT NOW. PANIC!!!!

But of course you’re now agreeing with someone calling the vaccines a “mass depopulation event” so you’ve just completely lost it.

Nope, I’m not agreeing this is a “mass depopulation” event. I’m saying that the specific IgG4 hyperboosting in the wake of these “vaccines” and reinfection needs to be explained, because it is troubling.

Covidiocy wrote:

Harambe wrote:

I’m in a hiring role in my job. I’ve turned down ~10 qualified applicants in the last year because of antivaxx beliefs. These are for roles that play $120-$250k. One of the great pleasures of my life.

First of all, $120-250k isn’t really all that much money and doesn’t somehow, magically give you more credibility. Secondly, you literally already said you are an independently wealthy “crypto” trader. Me thinks you are full of $hit.

Covidiocy wrote:

Harambe wrote:

I’m in a hiring role in my job. I’ve turned down ~10 qualified applicants in the last year because of antivaxx beliefs. These are for roles that play $120-$250k. One of the great pleasures of my life.

First of all, $120-250k isn’t really all that much money and doesn’t somehow, magically give you more credibility. Secondly, you literally already said you are an independently wealthy “crypto” trader. Me thinks you are full of $hit.

XY wrote:

Data from clinical trials:

Tweet:twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/status/1607...

1/This is a secondary reevaluation of the safety data from the clinical trials. They find a serious adverse event ratio of ~13 per 10,000 doses. This extrapolates to 341,000 Serious Adverse Events in the U.S.

2/ “In both Pfizer and Moderna trials, the largest excess risk occurred amongst the Brighton category of coagulation disorders.”

3/In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was (2.4x)higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants).

4/In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) was (over 4x)higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants).

6/In other words, they found that the vaccines contribute more to causing a serious adverse event than they do to prevent a COVID hospitalization.

DanM wrote:

Covidiocy wrote:

First of all, $120-250k isn’t really all that much money and doesn’t somehow, magically give you more credibility. Secondly, you literally already said you are an independently wealthy “crypto” trader. Me thinks you are full of $hit.

My take on the dead gorilla is that he posts on multiple sites using numerous names and is paid by scummy middlemen who get their money from Pfizer and/or Moderna. A paid troll going down with the sinking ship like the band on the Titanic playing "Nearer My God To Thee", thinking they would be in line for a heroes welcome and a large chunk of cash from White Star Lines if they made it back alive.

Harambe wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

I still shun the anti-vaxxers. I find stupid people difficult to relate to and not worth my time. It’s a good way to improve your life, don’t make time for morons (except for LRC).

I’m in a hiring role in my job. I’ve turned down ~10 qualified applicants in the last year because of antivaxx beliefs. These are for roles that play $120-$250k. One of the great pleasures of my life.

sudden death wrote:

I'm setting marathon PRs and you are bragging about walking. Guess you showed us

XY wrote:

New global study by Ioannidis (Stanford) shows the median COVID Infection Fatality Rates (IFR) for the unvaccinated and previously uninfected were:
0.0003% at 0-19 yrs
0.003% at 20-29 yrs
0.011% at 30-39 yrs
0.035% at 40-49 yrs
0.129% at 50-59 yrs
0.501% at 60-69 yrs

Tayler wrote:

close the topic, no one is sick with the crown. This is no longer relevant

m y 2 c wrote:

XY wrote:

New global study by Ioannidis (Stanford) shows the median COVID Infection Fatality Rates (IFR) for the unvaccinated and previously uninfected were:
0.0003% at 0-19 yrs
0.003% at 20-29 yrs
0.011% at 30-39 yrs
0.035% at 40-49 yrs
0.129% at 50-59 yrs
0.501% at 60-69 yrs

Weird, it looks like you left a couple rows off the end of the table.

Also weird, it looks like you don't realize that Ioannidis has been pushing out total cr*p science for 3 years now. His reputation is in shreds.

And extra weird, a disease with a 1 in 200 chance of killing you when you're in your 60s is a really bad thing. Those are good, productive hears for a lot of people in the U.S.

And the usual reminder: Covid does lots of bad things to people short of killing them.