Remember, Harambe is a political “agnostic” and a “libertarian” who doesn’t take sides, even though he only takes offense with the GOP, only participates on political threads denigrating conservatives, which and loves big government mandates (except on vetting unvaccinated migrants)🤡🤦♂️😂. Guy has zero credibility on anything because he lies.
However, let’s not pretend this is no big deal. While I’ve long suspected Waltz was a mole, this is a fukk up of epic proportions. The buck stops with Hegseth. Somebody needs to take a fall for this. You cannot credibly criticize the Democrats but take zero accountability for gross incompetence. Even if nothing got seriously compromised. I would get fired in the private sector for this, even if it weren’t my fault.
I say, give the job to Musk and let him choose goes and who stays👍
Yeah we agree it’s a big deal. Not sure why you need to add all that preamble. If anything it calls into question your credibility if you agree with me despite me being a moronic liar.
It’s ok to agree with me sometimes.
I criticize the left plenty. However there are far, far more dumb right wingers on LRC.
March 26, 2025 A Democrat won a surprise victory on Tuesday in a special election for the Pennsylvania State Senate, narrowly prevailing in a district that Donald Trump won by 15 points last fall.
To which you responded:
12 people voting in a special election is not an indicator of Dem popularity it's an indicator that Dems still know how to milk their billionaires for campaign dollars and turn out the sheep on command.
To which I pointed out that more than 55,000 people voted in the special election Pennsylvania State Senate district 36, which had been held by four different Republicans since 1979.
Now sure, a Democrat ALSO won the special election for State House District 36, but that wasn't a surprise and has nothing to do with anything posted here.
How can you post so confidently and be so f*cking wrong about everything?
The point was that no one votes in special elections.
That point is 100% valid whether it's district 35 or 36.
Because you're a stupid person you think 50,000 is a great turnout because have no idea what percentage of the registered voters 50,000 is.
Turn out is always low for special elections. Even more so for the GoP because the Gop doesn't have billionaires trying to buy every election like democrats do.
To which I pointed out that more than 55,000 people voted in the special election Pennsylvania State Senate district 36, which had been held by four different Republicans since 1979.
Now sure, a Democrat ALSO won the special election for State House District 36, but that wasn't a surprise and has nothing to do with anything posted here.
How can you post so confidently and be so f*cking wrong about everything?
The point was that no one votes in special elections.
That point is 100% valid whether it's district 35 or 36.
Because you're a stupid person you think 50,000 is a great turnout because have no idea what percentage of the registered voters 50,000 is.
Turn out is always low for special elections. Even more so for the GoP because the Gop doesn't have billionaires trying to buy every election like democrats do.
20 points lol
And also Elon? What are you smoking. Think before you type.
But you don't actually know my military pedigree, do you? Of course, that still doesn't stop you from disparaging someone else without the facts, which seems to be your standard procedure. Classy.
You consistently throw out childish ad hominem attacks and wonder why the rest of us dismiss your feedback.
To which I pointed out that more than 55,000 people voted in the special election Pennsylvania State Senate district 36, which had been held by four different Republicans since 1979.
Now sure, a Democrat ALSO won the special election for State House District 36, but that wasn't a surprise and has nothing to do with anything posted here.
How can you post so confidently and be so f*cking wrong about everything?
The point was that no one votes in special elections.
That point is 100% valid whether it's district 35 or 36.
Because you're a stupid person you think 50,000 is a great turnout because have no idea what percentage of the registered voters 50,000 is.
Turn out is always low for special elections. Even more so for the GoP because the Gop doesn't have billionaires trying to buy every election like democrats do.
It was more than half the turnout of a typical election for district 36, so hardly no one. But, my point stands that you're an idiot that didn't even know which district was being discussed but were calling people imbeciles for posting 100% correct information while you were 100% wrong (as usual!)
Oh really? Have any more absolutely stupid comments you want to make?
The point was that no one votes in special elections.
That point is 100% valid whether it's district 35 or 36.
Because you're a stupid person you think 50,000 is a great turnout because have no idea what percentage of the registered voters 50,000 is.
Turn out is always low for special elections. Even more so for the GoP because the Gop doesn't have billionaires trying to buy every election like democrats do.
It was more than half the turnout of a typical election for district 36, so hardly no one. But, my point stands that you're an idiot that didn't even know which district was being discussed but were calling people imbeciles for posting 100% correct information while you were 100% wrong (as usual!)
Oh really? Have any more absolutely stupid comments you want to make?
To which I pointed out that more than 55,000 people voted in the special election Pennsylvania State Senate district 36, which had been held by four different Republicans since 1979.
Now sure, a Democrat ALSO won the special election for State House District 36, but that wasn't a surprise and has nothing to do with anything posted here.
How can you post so confidently and be so f*cking wrong about everything?
The point was that no one votes in special elections.
That point is 100% valid whether it's district 35 or 36.
Because you're a stupid person you think 50,000 is a great turnout because have no idea what percentage of the registered voters 50,000 is.
Turn out is always low for special elections. Even more so for the GoP because the Gop doesn't have billionaires trying to buy every election like democrats do.
p.s. The point wasn't that no one votes in special elections. The point was that a district that Trump won easily just voted Democrat for the first time in more than 40 years.
But you don't actually know my military pedigree, do you? Of course, that still doesn't stop you from disparaging someone else without the facts, which seems to be your standard procedure. Classy.
You consistently throw out childish ad hominem attacks and wonder why the rest of us dismiss your feedback.
What do you hope to accomplish?
Just ignore him or ridicule him at most. His goal is to make every thread about himself and he loves the back and forth that goes on for 10 pages tgat distracts from the topic.
The point was that no one votes in special elections.
That point is 100% valid whether it's district 35 or 36.
Because you're a stupid person you think 50,000 is a great turnout because have no idea what percentage of the registered voters 50,000 is.
Turn out is always low for special elections. Even more so for the GoP because the Gop doesn't have billionaires trying to buy every election like democrats do.
p.s. The point wasn't that no one votes in special elections. The point was that a district that Trump won easily just voted Democrat for the first time in more than 40 years.
No.... the election was brought up to make the point that the Democrats are popular and winning elections.
The point was that voter turnout in special elections is low particularly among Republicans so the outcome isn't relevant to national trends.
Democrat party approval remains in the toilet and the party platform is still dogsh*t.
It was more than half the turnout of a typical election for district 36, so hardly no one. But, my point stands that you're an idiot that didn't even know which district was being discussed but were calling people imbeciles for posting 100% correct information while you were 100% wrong (as usual!)
Oh really? Have any more absolutely stupid comments you want to make?
Special elections were being discussed and the 2 districts are both in PA and both just happened.
My point is still correct despite your idiotic assertion that half of the normal turnout is a great turnout...
No. Special elections were NOT being discussed. Agip posted the results of a specific special election (the 36th district for the State Senate). When it was pointed out how many people voted in the specific special election being discussed (for the 36th district for the State Senate) you went all bonkers and started talking about a different special election (for the 35th district for the State House) to try and prove how few people voted.
Maybe try READING what's written before confidently stating things that are 100% wrong.
Special elections were being discussed and the 2 districts are both in PA and both just happened.
My point is still correct despite your idiotic assertion that half of the normal turnout is a great turnout...
No. Special elections were NOT being discussed. Agip posted the results of a specific special election (the 36th district for the State Senate). When it was pointed out how many people voted in the specific special election being discussed (for the 36th district for the State Senate) you went all bonkers and started talking about a different special election (for the 35th district for the State House) to try and prove how few people voted.
Maybe try READING what's written before confidently stating things that are 100% wrong.
This is where you being stupid causes you problems. You're too dumb to see the forest because you're focused on the trees...
Sure, those MAGA officials have a journalist at the Atlantic in their phone contacts list. Way more probable - some hackers have all the cabinet members' Signal accounts compromised and they caused the journalist to get included in the group chat.
Notice how frantically a certain dead gorilla posted after this? Looks like the dead gorilla is working several contracts.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
