Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

Of course the bosses don't want to stop price gouging.

Kamala doesn't either. Just BSing for votes

That's exactly what happens when you put Republicans in charge. They can't even manage their own state's voter registration.

Pathetic.

Here she is. She is a moron

Trump ad.

I'm a long time registered Democrat but you can't deny Republicans run places better than Democrats. Look at Orange County and Virginia Beach and then compare them to Chicago and DC.

Yeah, but you lie all the time too. So it cancels out. Lying has become a zero-sum game, Mullet head.

Eastman. John Charles Eastman. He was born in Nebraska. He married a Hindu too. Which is kind of ironic, given the amount of beef cows in Nebraska.

VP Pence did not like Eastman. I think you know why, Newman. I think you know only too well why Pence has a certain animosity to Eastman. What are your thoughts on Eastman? He's very popular in MAG@, even to this day.

Plenty of morons on Letsrun

Here is former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann testifying about a conversation he had with John Eastman regarding Eastman's legal theory that the Vice P can determine which electoral certificates should be counted or discarded.

Herschmann was pretty harsh on Eastman. It's not in the video, but Herschmann was harsh verbally on Kraken and Guliani too. A lot of people were harsh on Giuliani. Trump threw a fvcking plate of spaghetti at the guy. That's hardcore disrespect. That's what Trump does. Trump is vicious. He will FVCK you up bad if'n he gets the mind to. And Giuliani just invites abuse. It's like he has a "Kick My Azz" sign on his back. You know?

Megan Kelly and Bill O'Reilly are sounding the alarm bells that Trump is headed toward a loss because he has become "boring" and "can't stay on message" and so on.

They know he is falling apart and want to be able to say, "I supported him but I told you so."

Here come the Trumpsters to call them RINOs.

Ginamator is obsessed & sides with pedos.

Ginaminator you dumb fvck.

Pretty sure he was messing with you. He described exactly what Trump tried to have Pence do. And yeah, it's really effed up, which is why Trump should never be president again.

good news:

Racetothewhitehouse flipped AZ to Harris after it had been for Donny Epstein until now.

Good polling there.

36% of Alabama voted for Biden.

Where ever there are Democrats you will find corruption.

Kamala has already won the election. She's the current Vice President and, according to the Republicans, she has the power to reject any electoral votes.

"This follows up on my November 18 memo (copy here) advocating that unless the President and Vice President plan to concede the race if they fail to reach 270 electoral votes by December 14, the Trump-Pence electors all should meet in their respective States , and cast their votes and send them to Washington , so that the voteswillbephysicallypresentatthejointsessionofCongressonJanuary6.
Thismemobrieflycoversthreepoints: (1) importanceofalltheelectorsinall sixcontestedStatesvoting; (2) messagingaboutthis beinga routinemeasure; and
( 3) logistics.
1.The Trump-Penceelectors inallsix contestedStatesmustvote
I'd be happy to follow up on the subject with a separate memo, if the national
legal strategists are interested , but I've mulled over how January might play out,
and it seems feasible that the Trump campaign can prevent Biden from amassing
270 electoral votes on January 6, and force the Members of Congress , the media ,
and the American people to focus on the substantive evidence of illegal election and counting activities in the six contested States , provided three things happen :
(a)AlltheTrump-Penceelectorsmeetandvote,inallsixcontestedStates, and send in the certificates containing their votes , in compliance with federal and state statutes , on December 14;
(b ) There is pending , on January 6 , in each of the six States , at least one lawsuit, in either federal or state court, which might plausibly , if allowed to proceed
to completion , lead to either Trump winning the State or at least Biden beingdeniedtheState(ofcourse,ideallybythenTrumpwillhavebeenawardedoneor more ofthe States); and
( ) On January in a solemn and constitutionally defensible manner , consistent with clear indications that this what the Framers of the Constitution
intended and expected , and consistent with precedent from the first 70 years of our nation's history , Vice President Pence, presiding over the joint session, takes the
position that it is his constitutional power and duty , alone , as President of the Senate , to both open and count the votes , and that anything in the Electoral Count Acttothecontraryisunconstitutional.
Privilegedand Confidential
Trump Electors Voting on December 14
2
I'm not necessarily advising this course of action, and the Vice President need not make a decision on how to proceed untilJanuary 6, and obviously there are many factors that will come to bear on how he proceeds, assuming the racehas not
been conceded before January 6. My point here is that it is important that the alternate slates of electors meet and vote on December 14 if we are to create a
scenario under which Biden can be prevented from reaching 270 electoral votes, even if Trump has not managed by then to obtain court decisions (or state legislative resolutions) invalidating enough results to push Biden below 270.
Again , I'd be happy to elaborate further on the January 6 scenario I have in mind, but provided the three conditions above are met, unless I am missing
something , I believe that what can be achieved on January 6 is not simply to keep Biden below 270 electoral votes . It seems feasible that the vote count can be
conducted sothat at no point will Trump be behind in the electoral vote count unless and until Biden can obtain a favorable decision from the Supreme Court upholding the Electoral Count Act as constitutional , or otherwise recognizing the power of Congress (and not the President of the Senate) to count the votes .
Specifically but only if all six States are still contested , and all six slates of Trump-Pence electors had voted on December 14 I think the count could be
managed so that Biden would have to seek Supreme Court review either when he is behind 12-0 in the electoral count or, at latest, when he is behind 232-227.
Even if, in the end, the Supreme Court would likely end up ruling that the power to count the votes (in the sense of resolving controversies concerning them )
does not lie with the President of the Senate , but instead lies with Congress (either voting jointly , or in separate Houses) , letting matters play out this way would guarantee that public attention would be riveted on the evidence of electoral abuses by the Democrats, and would also buy the Trump campaign more time to win litigation that would deprive Biden of electoral votes and/or add to Trump's column .
recognize that what I suggest is a bold , controversial strategy , and that there are many reasons why it might not end up being executed on January 6. But as long as it is one possible option, to preserve it as a possibility it is important that the Trump -Pence electors cast their electoral votes on December 14.
2.Messaging about the December 14 vote as routine
Ifthe Trump campaign ends up deciding to have allof its electors vote on December 14, even in States in which Trump has not been declared the winner ,
presumablywordofthiswillleakoutpriortoDecember14.Soperhapsbeforethen
there should be messaging that presents this as a routine measure that is necessary to ensure that in the event the courts (or state legislatures ) were to later conclude
Privilegedand Confidential
Trump Electors Voting on December 14
3
thatTrumpactuallywonthe state, the correctelectoralslatecanbecountedin Congress in January just as the Democrats did in Hawaiiin 1960, which ended up with Hawaii'selectoralvotes beingawardedto Kennedy, eventhoughthe litigation was notresolved untilafter the electorsvoted (see my Nov. 18 memorandum) .
Two points might be made to support this as being a routine, sensible measure . First, our key adversary in Wisconsin , the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), has recognized that there is plenty of time for litigation to play out, and no need to rush unduly , because the real deadline is January 6. See pages 6-10 ofits Wisconsin Supreme Court brief, here.
Similarily , Justice Ginsburg noted that the date which has ultimate
significance under federal law is the sixth day of January , the date set by 3 U.S.C. 15 on which the Senate and House determine the validity of electoral
votes. here).
Bush v. Gore, 531U.S. 98, 144 (2000) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting) (opinion
Professor Tribe, a key Biden supporter and fervent Trump critic (e.g., here, here, and here) , has likewise noted that the only real deadline for a State's electoral votes to be finalized is before Congress starts to count the votes on January 6. Laurence H. Tribe , Comment : eroG .v hsuB and Its Disguises : Freeing Bush v . GoreFromItsHallofMirrors, 115Harv.L.Rev.170,265-66(2001)(copyhere).
Further, respected voices in the minority community are recently on record that January 6 is the important date . Consider, for example , this article in Roll Call
on October 26 (emphasis added) :
Some people believe the GOP's reluctance to support efforts in
the battleground states of Michigan and Pennsylvania to begin processing mail-in votes before Election Day is tied to the fact that
they have Democratic governors and Republican-controlled legislatures. If disputes over mail-in votes are dragging on in courtwhen it comes time for the Electoral College to meet on Dec. 14, it's possible legislators could put up their own slates.
Those disputes would land in the lap of Congress , and don't expect objections to come only from Republicans .
Sherrilyn Ifill, president and director of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, noted during a webinar hosted by the
Aspen Institute on Oct. 2 that just as the Black Caucus objected to the Florida vote in 2001, the same could happen in January if voters are intimidated from casting ballots or election officials are stopped by"

pjmedia.com

Even An Obama Economist is Trashing Kamala's Price Control Plan

Matt Margolis

Link:pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/08/17/e...

"This is not sensible policy, and I think the biggest hope is that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and no reality

The proposal is essentially Soviet-style price controls disguised as a federal ban on price-gouging. It aims to achieve two objectives: shifting the blame for inflation away from the Biden-Harris[/b]

America is not electing a Marxist.

#FTLH

^^^^^

The bolded stuff above is a lie. The MN cops and/or national guard was paint biffing prospective BLM looters/rioters in the hood for violating the curfew ordered in response to the BLM riots. It had nothing to do with "Covid protocol." There was no such "Covid protocol" requiring people to stay indoors.

So that's three of you guys -- Cowboy Cocky, WinstinSmiff, and Newmans -- who just post blatant, obvious lies. What's the point of lying on a message board? I get lying if you're trying to get out of trouble or make some money, but what is the value in lying about politics on a message board? What do you get from it? You just look like lying schnooks, and no believes anything you post. To what end are the lies? I'm seriously asking. Do you hope the lies will spread and affect the vote?

the only desire of Rs is to make the libs cry.

that's it. That's all they want. It's a revenge cult. If what they say makes a lib cry, it's fair game and to be done more and more. Whether it's true or false doesn't make an inch of difference to them.

Seriously, that's how they think.

Yeah, just noticed that.

RCP battleground state poll aggregate now only has Trump up by 0.1. I've been tracking their no toss up electoral vote map since before Harris entered the race. She's been steadily climbing each week. When she first took over Trump was well over 300. Harris has been steadily chipping away at that and she now has 262 to his 276.

Harris has the momentum and is still climbing. I expect another big jump in her poll numbers after the convention.

This was a very informative post. The three things we learned from his post:

(1) Projection is still running strong in this man.

(2) He obviously was harshly rejected by the females in his life.

(3) And oddly he has quite an obsession with male genitalia.