Red states, if any, should start the civil war when school’s out. They can get good rates on all those little buses they’re used to.
Red states, if any, should start the civil war when school’s out. They can get good rates on all those little buses they’re used to.
R’s are “condemning” donny’s policy in Syria. Show some backbone!
Donny will just keep screwing up until R’s dump him. Sux 2 B A traitor!
https://www.nj.com/opinion/2019/10/did-we-betray-the-kurds-for-trump-towers-editorial.htmljesseriley wrote:
R’s are “condemning” donny’s policy in Syria. Show some backbone!
Donny will just keep screwing up until R’s dump him. Sux 2 B A traitor!
Fair and unbalanced wrote:
https://www.nj.com/opinion/2019/10/did-we-betray-the-kurds-for-trump-towers-editorial.htmljesseriley wrote:
R’s are “condemning” donny’s policy in Syria. Show some backbone!
Donny will just keep screwing up until R’s dump him. Sux 2 B A traitor!
I wouldn’t rule it out, it is always about him.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49983357Remember that line about the Meeting being about Russian adoptions?
Or maybe donny was formally adopted by vladdy & calls him his daddy...
Ohio is Trump country wrote:
Ohio is Trump country, democrat. We’re on Trump’s side when the civil war begins!!!!
You won't get very far in your gas guzzling truck. You'll have to stop at a gas station in a democratic area, and get food in democratic area stories, before your push into the city. You will be sitting ducks sitting in freeway traffic trying to arrive to start your joke war ... your will be target practice.
jesseriley wrote:
Sally helps us figure out what Putin’s disinformation talking points are, soon to be everywhere, which was a big factor in 2016. She’s paid in gold rubles, I’m sure.
Putin isn't rigging 2020 like he did in 2016 for Trump. He sees more chaos in Trump failing around like a loon. Putin won't help him again and that is why Trump is so desperate to find any other country to start fake investigations so he has something to SCREAM about. The fake investigations would quickly die, but Trump will continue ranting and raving the the investigations were real and stopped by the Deep State.
Faked map. The real map is below. Someone colored in light red and light blue areas to solid red.#sad. Blue is mostly Dem. Red is mostly Repub. Lighter shades of either color are a mix. So, Trumpers, you will have to fight your Democrat neighbors long before you get close to the big cities where Trumpers are vastly outnumbered.
https://abagond.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/2016-election-by-county.pngTruth is Here wrote:
Impeach THIS!
https://mobile.twitter.com/politicalmiller/status/1181715133770485762
Will you STOP? wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I won't discuss science with a crazy person who thinks climate science is a hoax. You have said this many times.
Fat Hurts, will you please STOP feeding the troll?
Ciro apparently has known for a long time that Sally is a troll, and Kibitzer and even Flagpole have finally figured it out. You're one of the smarter posters--haven't you figured out that paying attention to trolls is *exactly* what they're here for?
Please join the other people in this thread who have said they will not respond--regardless of provocation or a direct question--to Sally under any circumstances. Starve the troll!
I've said this a trillion times already but Sally Vix is a C-rate troll and always has been for years back when the ol' Sally Vixxxen moniker was used.
But for every force, there is an equal and opposite force. People like Fat Hurts and Flagpole enjoy listening to their own pseudo-intellectual dipsh!ttery as much as Sally Vix loves being generally obnoxious and intentionally obtuse. Neither party can really help themselves and you could say they have much in common.
Always bad wrote:
The economy steadily improved from Sep 2011 through Nov 2012, which helped Obama win again.
The current economy is much better now but Trump still has low ratings. His rhetoric is divisive.
I don't see any economic boom happening but Trump's tariffs are making things more expensive for Americans.
Listen to me, and listen to me good. It matters less that the economy is very strong, what matters in this order is (1) perception about the economy (which effective trump tweets keep claiming is GOAT because of him), and (2) how the economy is trending during election season. Logic tells us that he will maneuver to boost it as much as possible, including with a terrible trade deal with China.
Explainerer wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Presidential candidate Joe Biden bragged at how he was able to fire the special prosecutor of his son, Hunter. Extortion 101. I am not a lawyer but that seems Extortion 101 and he will never be president.
So you take a pretty straight forward question and answer with a whataboutism that is far from being equivalent. I know you think you are trolling everyone but if you stop and look at how often you post it should make you wonder.
Lets dumb the Biden thing for you once more, just for good measure:
- Due to daddy's position, Hunter got a high paying job on the board the Ukrainian NG company.
- While he had no apparent qualifications for the job and it was obviously a conflict of interest situation - there was nothing illegal about it.
- Through consensus between western europe, the Obama admin, and congress, Biden delivered the message that the lame prosecutor wasn't doing anything and needed to go or else loan guarantees would be held up. NOTE THE KEY DIFFERENCES HERE: despite the conflict of interest, there is no evidence that Joe was targeting the prosecutor for going after the company the son worked for. In fact this kills the idea of intent... the US and Europe officially wanted the prosecutor gone which is proof that Biden's action was prompted by policy (unless you are somehow going to prove that Biden convinced Obama, Congress and Western Europe that the prosecutor was useless just to prevent them from going after the company the son worked for???)
- the prosecutor was fired, and of course offered the theory that he was a target because of Hunter's relationship with the VP.
- Not a single Republican congressman complained about it or accuse Biden then and the EU applauded the outcome
- furthermore, it has not been established as fact that the prosecutor was investigating that company (and recent confirmation has come out of Ukraine that this was the case)
- Biden boasts about having pushed the prosecutor out. Yes, he did, but he never said it had anything to do with the son.
To summarize for your pea brain, there are two massive differences between Biden and Trump's actions that completely invalidate your claim of equivalence:
1) Whether it benefited his son or not, Biden was acting on behalf of an open and endorsed policy by Obama, Congress and the EU. Trump was not acting on behalf of any official policy to root out specific corruption involving Biden. If you want to refute that then you must prove that Biden coerced Obama, Congress and the EU to play along.
2) Biden did not say to the prosecutor "hey I might push to have you fired, but if you stop investigating Burisma I'll reconsider" or "I will make sure you keep your job, but can you do me a favor and stop looking into Burisma because my son is on the board". Even with your small brain you can understand the difference between that and what trump said:
"I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. "... "I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine."
"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible."
"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
See the difference? Maybe reread it a few times, it'll click I promise.
Sally did you reply to this poster - curious how you can still defend your rubbish assertions.
Good point, the economy certainly has been manipulated right before elections.
Still, a majority don’t want endless scandals & dictatorship, and stonewalling the impeachment won’t work - up or down the ticket.
By playing along with trump, it will force a vote for an anti-trump. Look at how socialistic Europe is after right-wing dictatorships in the 30s & 40s.
Trollminator wrote:
Sally did you reply to this poster - curious how you can still defend your rubbish assertions.
Sally is pure, 100%, unadulterated troll.
The only way to trollminate her is to ignore her. And for Dog's sake, don't invite her to "defend her rubbish assertions!"
Are you or are you not Trollminator? If so, please act like it.
Sally Trolling 101 wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Sally did you reply to this poster - curious how you can still defend your rubbish assertions.
Sally is pure, 100%, unadulterated troll.
The only way to trollminate her is to ignore her. And for Dog's sake, don't invite her to "defend her rubbish assertions!"
Are you or are you not Trollminator? If so, please act like it.
+1
Lost in all the “corruption” allegations is trump’s refusal to release his taxes, which is the best way to hide his own corrupt deals.
Racket wrote:
Will you STOP? wrote:
Fat Hurts, will you please STOP feeding the troll?
Ciro apparently has known for a long time that Sally is a troll, and Kibitzer and even Flagpole have finally figured it out. You're one of the smarter posters--haven't you figured out that paying attention to trolls is *exactly* what they're here for?
Please join the other people in this thread who have said they will not respond--regardless of provocation or a direct question--to Sally under any circumstances. Starve the troll!
I've said this a trillion times already but Sally Vix is a C-rate troll and always has been for years back when the ol' Sally Vixxxen moniker was used.
But for every force, there is an equal and opposite force. People like Fat Hurts and Flagpole enjoy listening to their own pseudo-intellectual dipsh!ttery as much as Sally Vix loves being generally obnoxious and intentionally obtuse. Neither party can really help themselves and you could say they have much in common.
Wow, Racket just did a major diss on Fat Hurts and Flagpole, and me too. OUCH. Racket, if you have said a "trillion times" that I am a C-rate troll, isn't that a major indictment of you? Would you not realize after saying it even just a 100 times that no one is paying any attention to your warnings and you can keep saying it another trillion times (less the 100) but no one is going to listen to you. Maybe you need to quit saying it and focus on the brilliance and comic genius of your posts. You are renowned for your genius posts. I thought Flagpole was genius but he is Steve Alford to your Michael Jordan!
Oh, Maumee, can this really be the end? wrote:
Ohio is Trump country wrote:
Ohio is Trump country, democrat. We’re on Trump’s side when the civil war begins!!!!
Oh, man, can't you hear those Rascals revvin'?
The trumpers in OH are so confident of winning a civil war that they've (very sportingly) made themselves larger targets than the Dems.
http://unwisdom.org/chadspace/?attachment_id=16295
Did Jerry Nadler take out the stomach staple?
Trollminator wrote:
Explainerer wrote:
So you take a pretty straight forward question and answer with a whataboutism that is far from being equivalent. I know you think you are trolling everyone but if you stop and look at how often you post it should make you wonder.
Lets dumb the Biden thing for you once more, just for good measure:
- Due to daddy's position, Hunter got a high paying job on the board the Ukrainian NG company.
- While he had no apparent qualifications for the job and it was obviously a conflict of interest situation - there was nothing illegal about it.
- Through consensus between western europe, the Obama admin, and congress, Biden delivered the message that the lame prosecutor wasn't doing anything and needed to go or else loan guarantees would be held up. NOTE THE KEY DIFFERENCES HERE: despite the conflict of interest, there is no evidence that Joe was targeting the prosecutor for going after the company the son worked for. In fact this kills the idea of intent... the US and Europe officially wanted the prosecutor gone which is proof that Biden's action was prompted by policy (unless you are somehow going to prove that Biden convinced Obama, Congress and Western Europe that the prosecutor was useless just to prevent them from going after the company the son worked for???)
- the prosecutor was fired, and of course offered the theory that he was a target because of Hunter's relationship with the VP.
- Not a single Republican congressman complained about it or accuse Biden then and the EU applauded the outcome
- furthermore, it has not been established as fact that the prosecutor was investigating that company (and recent confirmation has come out of Ukraine that this was the case)
- Biden boasts about having pushed the prosecutor out. Yes, he did, but he never said it had anything to do with the son.
To summarize for your pea brain, there are two massive differences between Biden and Trump's actions that completely invalidate your claim of equivalence:
1) Whether it benefited his son or not, Biden was acting on behalf of an open and endorsed policy by Obama, Congress and the EU. Trump was not acting on behalf of any official policy to root out specific corruption involving Biden. If you want to refute that then you must prove that Biden coerced Obama, Congress and the EU to play along.
2) Biden did not say to the prosecutor "hey I might push to have you fired, but if you stop investigating Burisma I'll reconsider" or "I will make sure you keep your job, but can you do me a favor and stop looking into Burisma because my son is on the board". Even with your small brain you can understand the difference between that and what trump said:
"I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time. "... "I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine."
"I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it if that's possible."
"The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
See the difference? Maybe reread it a few times, it'll click I promise.
Sally did you reply to this poster - curious how you can still defend your rubbish assertions.
I started reading this post last night and am still reading it. It is a doozy! I even made 3 batches of coffee to keep me up so I could continue reading. Some of the words I didn't really know so I had to look in the dictionary. That slowed down my progress. I am on the last paragraph now.
