-
38
-
Via Nate Silver on X:
Today's update. 2nd straight mediocre polling day for Harris. In the range where it could be noise, but her lead in our national polling average has been trimmed to 2.4 points from 3.1.
14 -
4 days apart:
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.55 -
The Kamala campaign is starting to panic now that Swifties for Trump is starting to gain some momentum.
39 -
Lolz
Kamala has broken Hannity….
Hannity: This is the most dishonest deceptive campaign in our country's history. Today's speech was full of lots of lies about Donald Trump.
65 -
And still, not a single school in Minnesota has been found which supplies tampons in boys bathrooms.
Not one.
Is it weird to get all up in arms over something that does not exist?
94 -
Real Obvi wrote:
And still, not a single school in Minnesota has been found which supplies tampons in boys bathrooms.
Not one.
Is it weird to get all up in arms over something that does not exist?
I live in Florida. I noticed another weird thing.
Do you remember how Ron De Santis was leading the battle against the woke mind virus? He was everywhere battling right wing culture wars and working Fox News viewers into a frenzy.
Well since he stopped running for President he has almost turned into a normal governor. He doesn’t talk about any of that anymore.
It’s almost like this culture war stuff is imaginary BS just to get right wingers to vote for them.
113 -
Voting matters wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
The original yes-men are back for a last round of grifting from campaign funds. Trump humpers, they are gonna burn every last dollar of yours on vacations and fancy dinners before this is over. And then they are going to ask you for more and you are going to open your wallets again like good loyal dogs.
Can we start calling Democrats Kamala Ugly Bumpers, Harris / Hyena Humpers, Kamala boot knockers, Davi Doddlers, Hyena Hanky Pankers, Kamalamadingdongs, Davi Doppelbangers, Word Salad Smashers, etc?
With her price fixing plans, I guess we’ll just have to go with Kamunists
25 -
“voting matters” - no it doesn’t. Proof? 2020.
22 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Correct!
Kamala has doubled down on stupid. Marxist economic policies NEVER lead to prosperity. It's a guaranteed FAIL.
Kamala is going to get destroyed at first debate. She will never recover from it.
The great thing for Democrats is that really it doesn't matter if Kamala's economic policies aren't great. Donald Trump was found in civil court to be a rapist. Donald Trump was found in civil court to be an insurrectionist (and when SCOTUS took the case, they didn't disagree). Those of us with morals aren't going to vote to make a rapist our representative to the entire world, much less one that tried to overthrow the Republic. If Republicans were running a Mike Pence, or a Nikki Haley, or anyone who wasn't a rapist insurrectionist, maybe we could start to talk about economic policy, but I'm not going to talk economic policy to someone supporting a rapist.
96 -
This Harris thing has been a whole new misdirection.
At next week’s Democrat convention, they will name Joe Manchin as their Presidential candidate.
Larry Hogan will run as the Dem VP.Donald Trump will totally lose his mind.
41 -
Peach Pit wrote:
The great thing for Democrats is that really it doesn't matter if Kamala's economic policies aren't great. Donald Trump was found in civil court to be a rapist. Donald Trump was found in civil court to be an insurrectionist (and when SCOTUS took the case, they didn't disagree). Those of us with morals aren't going to vote to make a rapist our representative to the entire world, much less one that tried to overthrow the Republic. If Republicans were running a Mike Pence, or a Nikki Haley, or anyone who wasn't a rapist insurrectionist, maybe we could start to talk about economic policy, but I'm not going to talk economic policy to someone supporting a rapist.
Are you retarded or just brainwashed?
38 -
Sanctimonious and incorrect wrote:
Are you retarded or just brainwashed?
average rapist defender
Here's the SCOTUS ruling from the case where Colorado was taking him off the ballot. On page 6 (in a completely ahistoric and unconstitutional reading by the way), they say that States can't enforce the 14th amendment because the amendment says Congress can pass laws to enforce it.
SCOTUS on one of the worst days in their history wrote:
This case raises the question whether the States, in addition to Congress, may also enforce Section 3. We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency.Of course, this makes no sense because the 14th amendment also granted citizenship to former slaves, and Congress didn't need to pass any legislation for that to happen. The Constitution is the supreme Law of the land, higher than Congress. They didn't write into the amendment "insurrectionists can't hold office but only Congress can decide who that is", it says insurrectionists who took an oath to uphold the Constitution can't hold office, unless 2/3rds of Congress says they can.
You can argue with my positions, but don't argue that I can't think for myself. I'm one of very few people that actually read the SCOTUS cases when they dropped. I know you definitely didn't.
50 -
35
-
Peach Pit wrote:
Sanctimonious and incorrect wrote:
Are you retarded or just brainwashed?
average rapist defender
Here's the SCOTUS ruling from the case where Colorado was taking him off the ballot. On page 6 (in a completely ahistoric and unconstitutional reading by the way), they say that States can't enforce the 14th amendment because the amendment says Congress can pass laws to enforce it.
SCOTUS on one of the worst days in their history wrote:
This case raises the question whether the States, in addition to Congress, may also enforce Section 3. We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency.Of course, this makes no sense because the 14th amendment also granted citizenship to former slaves, and Congress didn't need to pass any legislation for that to happen. The Constitution is the supreme Law of the land, higher than Congress. They didn't write into the amendment "insurrectionists can't hold office but only Congress can decide who that is", it says insurrectionists who took an oath to uphold the Constitution can't hold office, unless 2/3rds of Congress says they can.
You can argue with my positions, but don't argue that I can't think for myself. I'm one of very few people that actually read the SCOTUS cases when they dropped. I know you definitely didn't.
Trump's latest economic arguments are "No fair! I said it first!" Regarding taxes on tips and child tax credits.
So we have a choice between the guy described below and a Lawyer / Prosecutor with no scandals who has won every election she has contested. Not a tough choice for people who believe in law and order.
Trump undermined the electoral process with lies, calls to officials to change votes, fake electors, asked the VP to break the law, and had his team break into voting machines. Then he incited a mob to break into Congress to stop the ratification of the vote of the people. He stole hundreds of classified documents and stored them in unsecured locations where his guests had access, lied about having them, and refused to return them for almost a year before the FBI had to go take them beck. Several of his companies have been convicted of fraud. In addition, he is an adjudication rapist.
72 -
ProsecuterV.Felon wrote:
Trump undermined the electoral process with lies, calls to officials to change votes, fake electors, asked the VP to break the law, and had his team break into voting machines. Then he incited a mob to break into Congress to stop the ratification of the vote of the people. He stole hundreds of classified documents and stored them in unsecured locations where his guests had access, lied about having them, and refused to return them for almost a year before the FBI had to go take them beck. Several of his companies have been convicted of fraud. In addition, he is an adjudication rapist.
Oh my god true he did and never let them forget it
Also don't forget that he was calling McCarthy while violent rioters were inside the Capitol, telling him "I guess they're more upset than you are, maybe you should delay the vote". He refused to call them off for 3 hours.
We can't act like supporting someone who literally tried to violently overthrow the government is a normal, respectable opinion.
51 -
Noyankee wrote:
Libs will be libs, cherry pickers wrote:
Typical Libby response from someone with no intellect. Trump will trounce Harris the flip flopping liar on November 5th and you'll be on here whining for 4 years. Cry harder.
Got that right. She just put out a Trump campaign ad admitting that inflation is out of control under her and Joe's leadership, yet her voting block doesn't believe her. Its hard to imagine they are dumber than she is, but facts are facts.
You've never explained why you lied about the jury instructions in the hooker trial.
42 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
agip wrote:
yup definitely better to give up and let tyrants around the world know that they can invade any country they want as long as it isn't a NATO member, and we won't try to stop them or organize a defense. I think you are exactly right. The world's tyrants will appreciate that. It's a form of freedom. There's no way all that warring overseas could possibly affect the US.
/sarc
You goaded a stranger into a fight with a dude 3 times his size and then you refused to help.
.
Wrong, liar. We've seen Mick Jagger wear eyeliner. We give him a pass. We will not give you're sexually confused candidate the benefit of the doubt.
30
2 posts were removed from this page.