Official Covid Vaccine thread

Unfortunately this is far from true.

mRNA Vaccines Increase Risk of Infection
Very bad news for the triple vaccinated and boosted
DR PANDA
DEC 21

Good Morning!
Maybe you’ve heard people saying the only ones getting sick from COVID-19 are the vaccinated? I know I’ve heard it! Well, it turns out they may be right.
The Cleveland Clinic put out a rather large study of its 51,011 employees trying to find out the Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine.
What they found out was………………
THE RISK OF COVID-19 INFECTION INCREASES WITH THE NUMBER OF DOSES
People who received three or more vaccines were 3x more likely to be reinfected than people who had none.

Risk of COVID-19 increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.
The Cleveland Clinic found the results to be “unexpected.”
The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected.
Researchers tried to blame this on people with a higher risk of COVID-19 simply got more vaccine doses. However they admit only a small proportion of people were at higher risk - most were young and healthy.
A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19. A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vaccine by the study start date, and which they had every opportunity to do.
The study continued to say those with 3 or fewer vaccines, who chose not to follow the CDC’s recommendations, are more likely to have “exhibited higher risk-taking behavior.” Before conceding their risk was less than those who actually followed the CDC’s recommendations.
Therefore, those who received fewer than 3 doses (>45% of individuals in the study) were not those ineligible to receive the vaccine, but those who chose not to follow the CDC’s recommendations on remaining updated with COVID-19 vaccination, and one could reasonably expect these individuals to have been more likely to have exhibited higher risk- taking behavior. Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses.
They were not the only study to find an association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risks of COVID-19. They reference 2 additional studies:
Study 1: Found those who had an Omicron variant infection with three vaccine doses had a higher risk of reinfection vs those who had an Omicron variant infection but only had 2 vaccine doses.
Study 2: Found either two or three doses of mRNA vaccine after a prior COVID-19 infection had a higher risk of reinfection vs a single mRNA vaccine dose.
This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19.
They were not even able to determine if the mRNA vaccine even protected against severe disease - the last remaining reason for people to support mass vaccination.
There were too few severe illnesses for the study to be able to determine if the vaccine decreased severity of illness.
In closing they added:
We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed.

Recap:
The Cleveland Clinic research study finds the higher number of vaccines received, the higher the risk of COVID reinfection. People who received three or more vaccines were 3x more likely to be reinfected than people who had none. They were also not able to even determine if the vaccines provide protection against severe disease.
What exactly are these vaccines doing? They are not preventing transmission, they are not preventing severe disease, they are not stopping the risk of reinfection. Can anyone find a positive benefit? The CDC and FDA are effectively blind at this point.
This should be very concerning to the vaccinated should a more virulent variant of Omicron emerge.

?

I honestly doubt that the jab is doing anyone any good from a health viewpoint

From CDC website just now:

CDC recommends that people ages 5 years and older receive one updated (bivalent) booster if it has been at least 2 months since their last COVID-19 vaccine dose, whether that was:
Their final primary series dose, or
An original (monovalent) booster
People who have gotten more than one original (monovalent) booster are also recommended to get an updated (bivalent) booster.

^see^

Sweet non-existent link. Anyway, that’s not “piahing a booster once every 2 months! Six per year!”

Reading comprehension helps.

Oh my God.

Such denial.

I copied and pasted from the CDC website. You cannot check this?

Ok. I will do it for you.

cdc.gov

COVID-19 Vaccination

CDC

COVID-19 vaccines protect against COVID-19. Get safety info and more.

Link:www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vacc...

Wondering how you will deny this. I know you wiil

CDC recommends that people ages 5 years and older receive one updated (bivalent) booster if it has been at least 2 months since their last COVID-19 vaccine dose.

Tell me how this does not mean they recommend a booster every 2 months.

If it's been 2 months since your last booster, you should receive an updated one.

Yes.

I have seen no evidence of this.

If someone with the bivalent vaccine has gotten a booster at any time then they are not in the recommendation you posted. That is not telling them to get boosted every two months. Like I said, reading comprehension helps.

Senior citizens in rebellion. Vax mob mafia loses again.

*******
At Mt. Diablo, the 51 seniors who still haven’t received the updated shot could use a fresh pitch. Two friends, Tsilya Tankover, 95, and Faina Gutkin, 77, got their initial vaccines, but they are among those refusing the booster that fights Omicron.

“I feel fine,” Ms. Gutkin said, pushing around the collard greens on her plate as she shared plans to go tango dancing. “Why do I need it? I’m still waiting for someone to tell me that.”

I knew it.

CDC recommends that people ages 5 years and older receive one updated (bivalent) booster if it has been at least 2 months since their last COVID-19 vaccine dose.

What do you think that means? If you are age 5 or older, if you have not had Covid vaccine dose in 2 months, you should receive an updated booster.

What could this possibly mean other then get booster every 2 months?

Last vaccine dose is not the same as last booster. I knew you wouldn’t get it.

Reading comprehension helps.

CDC recommends that people ages 5 years and older receive one updated (bivalent) booster if it has been at least 2 months since their last COVID-19 vaccine dose, whether that was:
Their final primary series dose, or
An original (monovalent) booster
People who have gotten more than one original (monovalent) booster are also recommended to get an updated (bivalent) booster.

Oh man, carmine caught lying yet AGAIN.

What carmine claimed the CDC was saying: "Get boosted every 2 months for perpetuity!"

What the CDC actually said: "If you've never had a bivalent booster we recommend you get one. If you just got the vaccine within the last 2 months then wait."

You can copy and paste, you just can’t understand it. Notice under the examples of “their last COVID-19 dose” it does not say bivalent booster.

Who over the age of four who has not had some version of the jab in the past 2 months is not recommended by the CDC to get booster under this guidance?

Simple example would be fine

Exactly.