Well, it did consider me like this: "He's probably better described as a pedantic contrarian or dogged skeptic."
As I said - that isn't anything. Except to you. Anyone who relies on Chat to determine what they are doesn't know.
That's not what really happened though, is it? I did not ask ChatGPT about me.
It was "Spigl" who had asked ChatGPT if I was a troll. Like everything, the answer was a wishy-washy "kinda sorta depends on what troll means". I knew before "Spigl" asked that many users want to view me that way, but seem to rely on their own non-classic definition. I have sometimes corrected them by saying I'm a skeptic, not a troll. The ChatGPT response is consistent with my historical responses.
It's unsurprising you don't really know what you are talking about, again, arguing against something you imagined happened, despite the plain history being available to you in writing.
I wonder, do you even know what ChatGPT is? I'm not sure you do, given your previous responses.
You also said "Chat". That looks like the French "Le Chat" based on Mistral AI.
As I said - that isn't anything. Except to you. Anyone who relies on Chat to determine what they are doesn't know.
That's not what really happened though, is it? I did not ask ChatGPT about me.
It was "Spigl" who had asked ChatGPT if I was a troll. Like everything, the answer was a wishy-washy "kinda sorta depends on what troll means". I knew before "Spigl" asked that many users want to view me that way, but seem to rely on their own non-classic definition. I have sometimes corrected them by saying I'm a skeptic, not a troll. The ChatGPT response is consistent with my historical responses.
It's unsurprising you don't really know what you are talking about, again, arguing against something you imagined happened, despite the plain history being available to you in writing.
I wonder, do you even know what ChatGPT is? I'm not sure you do, given your previous responses.
You also said "Chat". That looks like the French "Le Chat" based on Mistral AI.
You've only rendered it meaningless because you don't understand what is really happening around you, so you imagine things and respond to your imagination.
My life here at letsrun is a journey, as I challenge many popular claims looking for a basis more substantial than faith and fallacy. Among other predictable responses, are posters asking if I'm trolling, or in this case, asking AI if I'm a troll, and obliviots who cannot read who asked what to whom, and what the responses were, thinking I did the asking for my own personal reasons.
But that still seems far better than Grandpa Simpson shouting at clouds.
You've only rendered it meaningless because you don't understand what is really happening around you, so you imagine things and respond to your imagination.
My life here at letsrun is a journey, as I challenge many popular claims looking for a basis more substantial than faith and fallacy. Among other predictable responses, are posters asking if I'm trolling, or in this case, asking AI if I'm a troll, and obliviots who cannot read who asked what to whom, and what the responses were, thinking I did the asking for my own personal reasons.
But that still seems far better than Grandpa Simpson shouting at clouds.
Anyone who doesn't accept your nonsense is "shouting at clouds". You always end up describing yourself.
Anyone who doesn't accept your nonsense is "shouting at clouds". You always end up describing yourself.
The issue here is not "my nonsense", but you accusing me of something that "Spigl" clearly did (had you read the thread with comprehension), and then judging me for something you imagined.
You are the only one I said was "shouting at clouds". You are wandering alone lost in your own imagination.
I remember somebody saying that when she stopped racing in early 2021, before the big news broke, her stated reason was injury. Is there a source on that? I did some searching and didn't find much. If accurate, that doesn't look good for her.
I remember somebody saying that when she stopped racing in early 2021, before the big news broke, her stated reason was injury. Is there a source on that? I did some searching and didn't find much. If accurate, that doesn't look good for her.
Why would that look bad? An innocent athlete who wants to avoid the reputational stain of a wrongful doping allegation would have to come up with some alternate explanation why she is not racing. History shows that once the doping bell has been rung, it cannot be unrung.
You've only rendered it meaningless because you don't understand what is really happening around you, so you imagine things and respond to your imagination.
Anyone who doesn't accept your nonsense is "shouting at clouds". You always end up describing yourself.
The issue here is not "my nonsense", but you accusing me of something that "Spigl" clearly did (had you read the thread with comprehension), and then judging me for something you imagined.
You are the only one I said was "shouting at clouds". You are wandering alone lost in your own imagination.
You two just need to f*ck and get it over with already.
I remember somebody saying that when she stopped racing in early 2021, before the big news broke, her stated reason was injury. Is there a source on that? I did some searching and didn't find much. If accurate, that doesn't look good for her.
Yes she did. Well documented here on letsrun. Shows once more that her words cannot be trusted, yes, but who is surprised? Denial + deflection + lies are all part of Doping 101.
I remember somebody saying that when she stopped racing in early 2021, before the big news broke, her stated reason was injury. Is there a source on that? I did some searching and didn't find much. If accurate, that doesn't look good for her.
Why would that look bad? An innocent athlete who wants to avoid the reputational stain of a wrongful doping allegation would have to come up with some alternate explanation why she is not racing. History shows that once the doping bell has been rung, it cannot be unrung.
"some alternate explanation" hahaha what a nice way to describe her lies.
I remember somebody saying that when she stopped racing in early 2021, before the big news broke, her stated reason was injury. Is there a source on that? I did some searching and didn't find much. If accurate, that doesn't look good for her.
Yes she did. Well documented here on letsrun. Shows once more that her words cannot be trusted, yes, but who is surprised? Denial + deflection + lies are all part of Doping 101.
Is it well documented here on letsrun? Is it documented anywhere outside of letsrun? Like Detective P, I cannot seem to find anything on it, except a writeup from Jonathon Gault explaining why she didn't run a 10,000m over the winter, talking about a little plantar niggle which was minor and didn't prevent her from training.
Why would that look bad? An innocent athlete who wants to avoid the reputational stain of a wrongful doping allegation would have to come up with some alternate explanation why she is not racing. History shows that once the doping bell has been rung, it cannot be unrung.
"some alternate explanation" hahaha what a nice way to describe her lies.
Which lies? Recall here, we are just talking about the delayed announcement of her provisional suspension. Like Detective P, I couldn't find if any such "alternative explanation" was given, but unlike Detective P, I don't see how that would make her look bad, since both the innocent and guilty athlete can ask for discretion, and a deferred announcement.
On Monday, Houlihan was the third top female contender to announce a withdraw from the Olympic Trials, which being on Friday in Eugene, Oregon. ... Houlihan told Women’s Running in May that she had been getting treatment for plantar fasciitis, but that it hadn’t kept her from training. She had decided not to race prior to the Trials as a precaution, she said.
On Monday, Houlihan was the third top female contender to announce a withdraw from the Olympic Trials, which being on Friday in Eugene, Oregon. ... Houlihan told Women’s Running in May that she had been getting treatment for plantar fasciitis, but that it hadn’t kept her from training. She had decided not to race prior to the Trials as a precaution, she said.
Detective P said "... before the big news broke ..."
Detective P said "... before the big news broke ..."
LOL! The big news broke in June 2021, women's running reported what Houlihan said in May 2021. Which part of that don't you get? That May comes before June? Regardless even if May 2021 came after June 2021 in your unlimited imagination, she still lied with her "alternate explanation".
No wonder people call you out for your never ending trolling.
