COVID has caused cardiac deaths in thousands of young people.

2600 bro wrote:

Evidence? wrote:

“People who are contrarian for attention and clout are the ones -shocked- to realize people think less of low-evidence babbling“

You say this and then provide no evidence babbling. Just like always. Never willing to stand behind your tennis argument, always replying trust me just watch his play. There’s a reason people don't argue with toddlers, and it’s not because they’re afraid of losing. In your own words you are just a contrarian when it comes to tennis. No observable knowledge, no basis for arguments. Just an idiot babbling. I can’t believe you’re so low IQ to make that statement and then literally be that statement. Sad.

A chunk of the babbling is about how the mRNA vaccines are either ineffective, dangerous, or both. None of the babblers can provide evidence to support these beliefs... thus "babbling."

Whereas there are plenty of data to support the inverse of those statements.

2600 bro wrote:

Sub-9:00 guy wrote:

I beg of everyone here not to listen to Harambe or 2600 bro. Listen to Dr. Bhattacharya, MD/PhD from Stanford and head of the NIH here. He’s summarized everything I’ve ever tried to say, and there was most certainly a cover up and an attempt to destroy evidence and alienate people. The censorship and ostracization and politicization was done early and often.

It doesn’t matter if the “science” evolved over time. No dissent was allowed from some incredibly smart people. But, the 2024 election and subsequent political appointments were a massive repudiation of Harambe/2600bro, which is not only hilarious but poetic justice. Read this.

Link:bgrdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/D...

What was covered up? What evidence was destroyed? Lab leak?
Do you still think mRNA vaccines don’t work?
You really fail to present a coherent set of believes (well even one belief) other than “Harambe wrong”

I don’t think Bhattacharyas bio says anything about what you believe? He’s a supporter of mRNA vaccines and the pharma industry. He was against vaccine mandates and in 2020 supported “herd immunity” but fell silent on that topic after the Delta waves killed 300k Americans.

Can you try to be coherent and state what positions you have and what evidence supports those positions.

2600 bro wrote:

Evidence? wrote:

“People who are contrarian for attention and clout are the ones -shocked- to realize people think less of low-evidence babbling“

You say this and then provide no evidence babbling. Just like always. Never willing to stand behind your tennis argument, always replying trust me just watch his play. There’s a reason people don't argue with toddlers, and it’s not because they’re afraid of losing. In your own words you are just a contrarian when it comes to tennis. No observable knowledge, no basis for arguments. Just an idiot babbling. I can’t believe you’re so low IQ to make that statement and then literally be that statement. Sad.

A chunk of the babbling is about how the mRNA vaccines are either ineffective, dangerous, or both. None of the babblers can provide evidence to support these beliefs... thus "babbling."

Whereas there are plenty of data to support the inverse of those statements.

Sub-9:00 guy wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

A chunk of the babbling is about how the mRNA vaccines are either ineffective, dangerous, or both. None of the babblers can provide evidence to support these beliefs... thus "babbling."

Whereas there are plenty of data to support the inverse of those statements.

How about just simply unnecessary in massive cohorts of extremely low risk people? Which is observable fact. Why can’t you simply accept that rather than always have to go down the narrow path of safe and effective? Who cares if it was safe and effective? Great. Your choice. Dr. Redfield, former head of the CDC, is the one who would take issue with your “safe” verdict. So, instead of incessantly arguing with a bunch of message board “simpletons,” thereby becoming one yourself, why don’t you take it up with him.

And, again, Dr. Bhattacharya summarizes it all beautifully. There’s a reason the ideology of Collins/Fauci ultimately got rejected. That’s where all the censorship and partisanship and cover up came from from the get-go.

Link:bgrdc.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/D...

Harambe wrote:

2600 bro wrote:

What was covered up? What evidence was destroyed? Lab leak?
Do you still think mRNA vaccines don’t work?
You really fail to present a coherent set of believes (well even one belief) other than “Harambe wrong”

I don’t think Bhattacharyas bio says anything about what you believe? He’s a supporter of mRNA vaccines and the pharma industry. He was against vaccine mandates and in 2020 supported “herd immunity” but fell silent on that topic after the Delta waves killed 300k Americans.

Can you try to be coherent and state what positions you have and what evidence supports those positions.

Jay updated his opinions after Delta proved him wrong! I give him credit for that.

If only those who idolize him would follow his example

The unintended irony of claiming a guy who was just appointed head of the NIH and has been a Stanford prof all along was “suppressed and silenced.”

“Suppressed and silenced” = didn’t win a Nobel prize. I guess I’ve been suppressed and silenced too!!

2600 bro wrote:

Evidence? wrote:

“People who are contrarian for attention and clout are the ones -shocked- to realize people think less of low-evidence babbling“

You say this and then provide no evidence babbling. Just like always. Never willing to stand behind your tennis argument, always replying trust me just watch his play. There’s a reason people don't argue with toddlers, and it’s not because they’re afraid of losing. In your own words you are just a contrarian when it comes to tennis. No observable knowledge, no basis for arguments. Just an idiot babbling. I can’t believe you’re so low IQ to make that statement and then literally be that statement. Sad.

A chunk of the babbling is about how the mRNA vaccines are either ineffective, dangerous, or both. None of the babblers can provide evidence to support these beliefs... thus "babbling."

Whereas there are plenty of data to support the inverse of those statements.

Harambe wrote:

Evidence? wrote:

“People who are contrarian for attention and clout are the ones -shocked- to realize people think less of low-evidence babbling“

You say this and then provide no evidence babbling. Just like always. Never willing to stand behind your tennis argument, always replying trust me just watch his play. There’s a reason people don't argue with toddlers, and it’s not because they’re afraid of losing. In your own words you are just a contrarian when it comes to tennis. No observable knowledge, no basis for arguments. Just an idiot babbling. I can’t believe you’re so low IQ to make that statement and then literally be that statement. Sad.

The difference is, I am not here writing impassioned screeds about being suppressed and silenced because you disagree with me.

Instead I calmly refute and highlight my genius diagnosis while you frantically scrub at the “post hoc” spot on your hand. Out out!