Saved by another $1 Trillion in 100 days. And some rather bland AI claims. Apple remains a stable, but slow growth company. Strong revenue stream of loyal customers allows it to buyback $Billions of stock, enhance the wealth of Tim Cook and his merry band of insiders.
This post was edited 10 minutes after it was posted.
Saved by another $1 Trillion in 100 days. And some rather bland AI claims. Apple remains a stable, but slow growth company. Strong revenue stream of loyal customers allows it to buyback $Billions of stock, enhance the wealth of Tim Cook and his merry band of insiders.
Saved by another $1 Trillion in 100 days. And some rather bland AI claims. Apple remains a stable, but slow growth company. Strong revenue stream of loyal customers allows it to buyback $Billions of stock, enhance the wealth of Tim Cook and his merry band of insiders.
No surprise with that reply. As usual, instead of displaying a bit of humility and admitting he was wrong, Igy doubles down on stupid.
Saved by another $1 Trillion in 100 days. And some rather bland AI claims. Apple remains a stable, but slow growth company. Strong revenue stream of loyal customers allows it to buyback $Billions of stock, enhance the wealth of Tim Cook and his merry band of insiders.
You're off by $700 billion!
Well, only because of April 15, 2024 tax receipts.
One year from that date when the challenge was made, the stock rose approximately 15%, and it is up over 35% from the date of the challenge.
OK, but a 32 PE says you are paying more for less. And at a historical market average PE of 16, the stock is back at? You guessed it! $100.
Igy - if you make a prediction and are wrong - often egregiously wrong - own up to it. Don't move the goal posts. Say you were wrong and we go on. You have never said you were wrong and you are wrong more often than anyone else here.
OK, but a 32 PE says you are paying more for less. And at a historical market average PE of 16, the stock is back at? You guessed it! $100.
Igy - if you make a prediction and are wrong - often egregiously wrong - own up to it. Don't move the goal posts. Say you were wrong and we go on. You have never said you were wrong and you are wrong more often than anyone else here.
Igy - if you make a prediction and are wrong - often egregiously wrong - own up to it. Don't move the goal posts. Say you were wrong and we go on. You have never said you were wrong and you are wrong more often than anyone else here.
And dude, I totally let you go in 2022. Never rubbing your nose in it. Really ludicrous to say what you did when the 2022 post was so obviously wrong, then crying about the reasons, and why Apple can still trade at $100. That is this thread, but OK.
Funny yesterday acting like the great peacemaker. You know, you are about the most two faced person on this thread.
This post was edited 10 minutes after it was posted.
In 2024, the federal government may soon launch an extension to the existing Child Tax Credit program as a part to help families with kids. Unlike one-time stimulus checks, this plan will provide families totalling up to $870...
"Basically, the program $8,700 stimulus checks are being considered as an extended version of the Child Tax Credit, aimed at helping low-income families with children."
Is that going to a demographic that invests in stocks?
It amounts to $700 per month to families that probably don't fit the description of your average stock investors, if it were to get implemented at all.
"Basically, the program $8,700 stimulus checks are being considered as an extended version of the Child Tax Credit, aimed at helping low-income families with children."
Is that going to a demographic that invests in stocks?
It amounts to $700 per month to families that probably don't fit the description of your average stock investors, if it were to get implemented at all.
Does that mean inflation has no impact on bond yields? and that bond yields don’t impact stock market?
"Basically, the program $8,700 stimulus checks are being considered as an extended version of the Child Tax Credit, aimed at helping low-income families with children."
Is that going to a demographic that invests in stocks?
It amounts to $700 per month to families that probably don't fit the description of your average stock investors, if it were to get implemented at all.
Does that mean inflation has no impact on bond yields? and that bond yields don’t impact stock market?
And dude, I totally let you go in 2022. Never rubbing your nose in it. Really ludicrous to say what you did when the 2022 post was so obviously wrong, then crying about the reasons, and why Apple can still trade at $100. That is this thread, but OK.
Funny yesterday acting like the great peacemaker. You know, you are about the most two faced person on this thread.
Posted exactly 9 minutes after posting “I was wrong.” The lack of humility and sincerity with this guy is off the charts.
And dude, I totally let you go in 2022. Never rubbing your nose in it. Really ludicrous to say what you did when the 2022 post was so obviously wrong, then crying about the reasons, and why Apple can still trade at $100. That is this thread, but OK.
Funny yesterday acting like the great peacemaker. You know, you are about the most two faced person on this thread.
Posted exactly 9 minutes after posting “I was wrong.” The lack of humility and sincerity with this guy is off the charts.
So says the guy that created close to a dozen handles to harass my posts, here and elsewhere. Your problem is you never got help for your mental illness.
stimulus=debt=inflation=higher interest=greater bond yields=redirecting investment in stocks to Bonds.
Free at last free at last, thank god almighty! we are free at last
The real win, for now anyhow, is homeowners that took out mortgages under 3%, and transferred that equity away from the lender’s balance sheet. The nature of commercial real estate loans created a problem for both the lender and borrower.
