Trump can deport illegal aliens without any warrants. The deportation numbers should increase BIGLY!
Did you even read the ruling? It has jack sh*t to do with deporting people without warrants. The case was about what standard of review a federal appeals court should just when assessing a Board of Immigration Appeals ruling.
We should build a prison city to house three million men in El Salvador or the Philippines and ship all these guys [repeat violent offenders] there for life. These countries can feed and house a prisoner for less than $10,000 per year which is more than 90% less than they cost Americans in criminal justice, incarceration and social services. Our cities would be the nicest in the world. New York’s affordability crisis would instantly be solved because huge swathes of the Bronx and East Brooklyn that are currently no-go zones would become attractive places to live. Manhattan would be glittering and pristine, the NYC subway would be as clean and safe as the transit in Seoul and you would be able to leave your bike in front of a coffee shop in Brooklyn without locking it up. You would never have to run away because you made the mistake of looking in the direction of someone who was screaming and accidentally made eye contact with a violent schizo. Old ladies would never get sucker-punched in the street. We are giving up so much quality of life out of compassion for the worst people among us, and everything would be so much better if we just got rid of them.
The U.S. lost 92,000 jobs in February, the Labor Department said Friday, missing expectations. The labor market slowed markedly last year, with the U.S. adding the fewest jobs outside of a recession since 2003.
What does it say about the state of our country when citizens aren’t sure who is lying less. Trump or the Iranian leader.
Yes, unfortunately, that has been true for over a year. With China, Russia, Noth Korea, etc. And honestly, at least with China, if you put a gun to my head, in MANY circumstances, I probably WOULD trust China's statements about things more than Trump/Trump flunkies. Greatness, no doubt.
We should build a prison city to house three million men in El Salvador or the Philippines and ship all these guys [repeat violent offenders] there for life. These countries can feed and house a prisoner for less than $10,000 per year which is more than 90% less than they cost Americans in criminal justice, incarceration and social services. Our cities would be the nicest in the world. New York’s affordability crisis would instantly be solved because huge swathes of the Bronx and East Brooklyn that are currently no-go zones would become attractive places to live. Manhattan would be glittering and pristine, the NYC subway would be as clean and safe as the transit in Seoul and you would be able to leave your bike in front of a coffee shop in Brooklyn without locking it up. You would never have to run away because you made the mistake of looking in the direction of someone who was screaming and accidentally made eye contact with a violent schizo. Old ladies would never get sucker-punched in the street. We are giving up so much quality of life out of compassion for the worst people among us, and everything would be so much better if we just got rid of them.
You act like violent criminals just pop out of the earth without a root cause.
The Dow Industrials lost nearly 785 points in Thursday’s sell-off as oil prices leapt. The blue-chip index is on track for its worst week since October.
Kuwait is halting oil production because it can't store any more, because the tankers aren't sailing.
$90 oil. Markets plunging.
Heck of a job, Piggie.
It would be great if the media (and perhaps Democrats in Congress) will increasingly ask, "Hey, it's really awesome that you're blowing shi* up all over Iran, but why aren't you opening and keeping open the straights? We have the greatest military (and Navy) in history, right? You tell us that every day. Why can't that great force do the job?"
And this isn't, by the way, a critique of just Trump. Among other things, we've been horrendous in properly planning and building our fleet for a very long time. Lots of Tomahawks and cool planes? Check. The numbers or capabilities to fend off China or keep open the straights? Nope.
Kuwait is halting oil production because it can't store any more, because the tankers aren't sailing.
$90 oil. Markets plunging.
Heck of a job, Piggie.
It would be great if the media (and perhaps Democrats in Congress) will increasingly ask, "Hey, it's really awesome that you're blowing shi* up all over Iran, but why aren't you opening and keeping open the straights? We have the greatest military (and Navy) in history, right? You tell us that every day. Why can't that great force do the job?"
And this isn't, by the way, a critique of just Trump. Among other things, we've been horrendous in properly planning and building our fleet for a very long time. Lots of Tomahawks and cool planes? Check. The numbers or capabilities to fend off China or keep open the straights? Nope.
the problem with military ships in the strait is that they'd be sitting ducks for things we don't understand yet. Underwater drones, unmanned ships, along with traditional airplanes, missile, mines.
there are unmanned underwater torpedoes that are like airborne loitering munitions...just hanging around waiting for a target. Plus Iran has supersonic airplanes and missiles of course. But we know how to handle those.
Sending Navy ships through hormuz is pretty much the same as putting boots on the ground. Asking for an incident that forces us to engage more.
It would be great if the media (and perhaps Democrats in Congress) will increasingly ask, "Hey, it's really awesome that you're blowing shi* up all over Iran, but why aren't you opening and keeping open the straights? We have the greatest military (and Navy) in history, right? You tell us that every day. Why can't that great force do the job?"
And this isn't, by the way, a critique of just Trump. Among other things, we've been horrendous in properly planning and building our fleet for a very long time. Lots of Tomahawks and cool planes? Check. The numbers or capabilities to fend off China or keep open the straights? Nope.
the problem with military ships in the strait is that they'd be sitting ducks for things we don't understand yet. Underwater drones, unmanned ships, along with traditional airplanes, missile, mines.
there are unmanned underwater torpedoes that are like airborne loitering munitions...just hanging around waiting for a target. Plus Iran has supersonic airplanes and missiles of course. But we know how to handle those.
Sending Navy ships through hormuz is pretty much the same as putting boots on the ground. Asking for an incident that forces us to engage more.
We're in a new world naval wise.
I'm not saying that it's not hard. Of course it's hard. But we've known the importance of that straight and the challenge of keeping it open for decades. And we've been spending over a billion dollars a day on our military for a few decades, too (now roughly 3B/day).
And to be clear, I'm not saying - and we're certainly not limited to - SHIPS keeping those straights open. It's whatever it takes. Smaller surface stuff (manned or unmanned), improved large surface defense capabilities, air (ditto), sub-surface, EW, etc., etc.
Has the Navy and DoD come close to properly prioritizing and funding that challenge? Or do we much prefer cool Tomahawks and B-2's and F-22s?
the problem with military ships in the strait is that they'd be sitting ducks for things we don't understand yet. Underwater drones, unmanned ships, along with traditional airplanes, missile, mines.
there are unmanned underwater torpedoes that are like airborne loitering munitions...just hanging around waiting for a target. Plus Iran has supersonic airplanes and missiles of course. But we know how to handle those.
Sending Navy ships through hormuz is pretty much the same as putting boots on the ground. Asking for an incident that forces us to engage more.
We're in a new world naval wise.
I'm not saying that it's not hard. Of course it's hard. But we've known the importance of that straight and the challenge of keeping it open for decades. And we've been spending over a billion dollars a day on our military for a few decades, too (now roughly 3B/day).
And to be clear, I'm not saying - and we're certainly not limited to - SHIPS keeping those straights open. It's whatever it takes. Smaller surface stuff (manned or unmanned), improved large surface defense capabilities, air (ditto), sub-surface, EW, etc., etc.
Has the Navy and DoD come close to properly prioritizing and funding that challenge? Or do we much prefer cool Tomahawks and B-2's and F-22s?
Maybe Trump doesn't have a problem with high Oil prices. We know that Putin doesn't. And we know that Oil Companies are enjoying the spike at the moment with domestic oil.
the problem with military ships in the strait is that they'd be sitting ducks for things we don't understand yet. Underwater drones, unmanned ships, along with traditional airplanes, missile, mines.
there are unmanned underwater torpedoes that are like airborne loitering munitions...just hanging around waiting for a target. Plus Iran has supersonic airplanes and missiles of course. But we know how to handle those.
Sending Navy ships through hormuz is pretty much the same as putting boots on the ground. Asking for an incident that forces us to engage more.
We're in a new world naval wise.
I'm not saying that it's not hard. Of course it's hard. But we've known the importance of that straight and the challenge of keeping it open for decades. And we've been spending over a billion dollars a day on our military for a few decades, too (now roughly 3B/day).
And to be clear, I'm not saying - and we're certainly not limited to - SHIPS keeping those straights open. It's whatever it takes. Smaller surface stuff (manned or unmanned), improved large surface defense capabilities, air (ditto), sub-surface, EW, etc., etc.
Has the Navy and DoD come close to properly prioritizing and funding that challenge? Or do we much prefer cool Tomahawks and B-2's and F-22s?
....oh, and we have a handful of REALLY wealthy and REALLY self-interested allies in the Gulf who could have helped with funding and/or forces.
But does Congress or the Navy (or US industry) care much about it? Not really. Building Burkes, Tomahawks, F-35s, and the occasional carrier has been just fine.
There will be no deal with Iran except UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER! After that, and the selection of a GREAT & ACCEPTABLE Leader(s), we, and many of our wonderful and very brave allies and partners, will work tirelessly to bring Iran back from the brink of destruction, making it economically bigger, better, and stronger than ever before. IRAN WILL HAVE A GREAT FUTURE. “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN (MIGA!).” Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
....oh, and we have a handful of REALLY wealthy and REALLY self-interested allies in the Gulf who could have helped with funding and/or forces.
But does Congress or the Navy (or US industry) care much about it? Not really. Building Burkes, Tomahawks, F-35s, and the occasional carrier has been just fine.
Every country should be self-interested. You should prioritize your country over others.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
