This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Too bad nobody in Congress is doing the same. A prominent UK cardiologist suppressed a study showing the vaccines damage the heart because he didn't want to lose pharma funding.
At 16:32 in the video, Bridgen also talked about a 'cover-up' of research linking mRNA jabs with heart inflammation by a prominent health authority of the British Heart Foundation (BHF) so that future pharma research funding would not be impacted. He asked members of his research team to sign NDAs.
This is not illegal; it is how science is done today in the UK (and other countries). The researchers’ first priority is ensuring future funding, not your safety.
Press coverage:
Story in the Express (UK)
Story in Times of India
Two stories. It’s a start.
Google was able to find just ONE story mentioning Bridgen. I’m serious! Everything else was 1 week old or older!
I'm setting marathon PRs and you are bragging about walking. Guess you showed us
If you're vaxxed, you might want to have a D-dimer test done and consider cutting back on strenuous exercise to max your shortened lifespan. But, YOLO and chase marathon PRs if you want, it is hard pill to swallow for most people what the "vaccines" are and moreso that they allowed it to be injected in them.
I'm setting marathon PRs and you are bragging about walking. Guess you showed us
If you're vaxxed, you might want to have a D-dimer test done and consider cutting back on strenuous exercise to max your shortened lifespan. But, YOLO and chase marathon PRs if you want, it is hard pill to swallow for most people what the "vaccines" are and moreso that they allowed it to be injected in them.
Lol you're not one of those idiots that think you only get a certain amount of heartbeats??
Sorry you are afraid and can't run but this message board is for runners.
weird then how 49 year old, skinny sports writer's head explodes...
Gounder's hilarious: people over 64 die? Really?!
Strange how sh*tlibs like her advocate "diversity" in almost all things yet when it comes to rona vax and booster, booster, booster... all she cares about is heaering herself speak, and her celebrity.
Why should the person who had rona and recovered just fine ever gotten Rona vax-- let alone have it be a "mandate"?
Why should a kid at zero risk who did get a shot, got COVID, and recovered in two days (sniffle) get a booster? Etc Etc
Her authoritarian anti-intellectualism is astounding.
If anyone here, on EITHER SIDE, thinks you can trust the studies, you simply have not been paying attention. If you think one side's studies are more credible than the other, it's because you have made up your mind who you believe and you have no objectivity. The bottom line is that The Great Barrington Declaration was probably right. IMO, Old people should get the vax and young, healthy people should not. When you give a vaccine to a five year old, who has essentially a zero chance of serious problems from covid and less than zero chance of complications from the vaccine, you're pushing an agenda. Ask why. The evidence on both sides says that we shouldn't be giving vaccinations to young people, yet even the President of the US is pushing them? Why?
btw, I'm almost 60 and I got the vaccination. I'm not antivax.
If anyone here, on EITHER SIDE, thinks you can trust the studies, you simply have not been paying attention. If you think one side's studies are more credible than the other, it's because you have made up your mind who you believe and you have no objectivity. The bottom line is that The Great Barrington Declaration was probably right. IMO, Old people should get the vax and young, healthy people should not. When you give a vaccine to a five year old, who has essentially a zero chance of serious problems from covid and less than zero chance of complications from the vaccine, you're pushing an agenda. Ask why. The evidence on both sides says that we shouldn't be giving vaccinations to young people, yet even the President of the US is pushing them? Why?
btw, I'm almost 60 and I got the vaccination. I'm not antivax.