Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Thank you for this genuine post. So do you think that because he is our president we cannot complain and demand better? If you do not easily understand why people are so angry and depressed with someone like him at the helm, then you really have to ask yourself what values you stand for.

You also dodged making a judgement on him as a president. You say he’s horrible but you don’t go as far as saying he’s horrible FOR THE COUNTRY. So which is it? Forget what the MSM are saying and how liberals are reacting, do you think he’s doing a fine job and with the best interests of the country in mind?

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes, children are still being separated from their parents. It doesn't happen as often as last year, but it still happens. Look it up for yourself.

Yes, the illegal immigrants are being treated MUCH worse than the suspected terrorists.

And again, I'm just talking about asylum seekers right now. These are people who are not accused of any crime.

If that is true, than it is a travesty and should be corrected immediately.

“If that’s true” = I’m not going to bother to verify this myself because it doesn’t fit into my trumper narrative

2 Points wrote:

Nope. I am 100% logical 100% of the time.

0/10

He is a horrible person. I do not think he is horrible for the country. I really wish we could all work together to make the country better but that is not going to happen because both sides are so entrenched and will never work with the other side. The Dem candidates have become so far to the right that they are all for giving health insurance to illegals, opening the borders, etc., etc. The country can't afford that. My insurance premiums are $25,000 and I am going to have to pay health coverage for illegals here ILLEGALLY? AOC's New Green Plan will cost 90 trillion. Do you want to pay for that? Because I can't. Let's get some level-headed thinking back into our discourse. The Dem candidates are nut jobs.

Sally really needs to read a history of nazi germany. Salster has absolutely no idea what is going on. He has no idea why good people loathe trump so much.

Sally, in short. Very short. Hitler got a foothold in Germany playing exactly the same game as Trump. He succeeded because of people like you. 'Oh, that Adolf! He's too much...but really he's helping the economy. And who do we want? Communists to rule Germany?"

Sally, read about 1930s Germany. The 'good' germans are you. You are the good germans. The Dems are trying to stop 1939 Germany from taking place in America. You are aiding and abetting the 1939 Germany.

agip wrote:

Meanwhile in the good guys party, Biden has made back whatever he lost after the first debate. Harris has given back half her gains.

These debates might be too early to mean anything. If they ever will mean anything.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/2020_democratic_presidential_nomination-6730.html

Let's get back to tonight & tomorrow's debates.

How are the Dems going to defend the cities they have run into the ground?

How are the Dems going to defend giving billions to illegal aliens instead of the citizens of these cities?

Good luck selling that to the moderate voters.

KAG2020

1930s Germany and 2019 United States are world apart. To suggest otherwise makes you look like you belong in a loony bin.

Sally Vix wrote:

He is a horrible person. I do not think he is horrible for the country. I really wish we could all work together to make the country better but that is not going to happen because both sides are so entrenched and will never work with the other side. The Dem candidates have become so far to the right that they are all for giving health insurance to illegals, opening the borders, etc., etc. The country can't afford that. My insurance premiums are $25,000 and I am going to have to pay health coverage for illegals here ILLEGALLY? AOC's New Green Plan will cost 90 trillion. Do you want to pay for that? Because I can't. Let's get some level-headed thinking back into our discourse. The Dem candidates are nut jobs.

You would benefit tremendously by Medicare-for-all. Your premiums would be nowhere near 25K.

AOC's Green New Deal resolution costs $0.00.

There is no spending proposal yet. So quit making stuff up.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The Dem candidates want open [borders]. . .

Please name two Democratic candidates who are on record as *actually* favoring "open borders." A link would be great, too.

Thanks!

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

Sally really needs to read a history of nazi germany. Salster has absolutely no idea what is going on. He has no idea why good people loathe trump so much.

Sally, in short. Very short. Hitler got a foothold in Germany playing exactly the same game as Trump. He succeeded because of people like you. 'Oh, that Adolf! He's too much...but really he's helping the economy. And who do we want? Communists to rule Germany?"

Sally, read about 1930s Germany. The 'good' germans are you. You are the good germans. The Dems are trying to stop 1939 Germany from taking place in America. You are aiding and abetting the 1939 Germany.

1930s Germany and 2019 United States are world apart. To suggest otherwise makes you look like you belong in a loony bin.

history doesn't repeat itself but it rhymes. Whatever the Trump is trying to lead us to won't be exactly like Nazi Germany but it will be very very bad. Trump's trying to eliminate the very idea of truth, his scapegoating ethnic groups and his encouraging of violence is enough.

If you want more, here are 12 signs of young fascism. Trump ticks almost all of them.

Don't be a good german, Sally. Don't put up with adolf because you are afraid. have some personal standards and a backbone. Any of the dems would be another obama. That was fine.

1. Powerful and continuing nationalism

2. Disdain for human rights

3. Identification of enemies as a unifying cause

4. Rampant sexism

5. Controlled mass media

6. Obsession with national security

7. Religion and government intertwined

8. Corporate power protected

9. Labor power suppressed

10. Disdain for intellectual and the arts

11. Obsession with crime and punishment

12. Rampant cronyism and corruption

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Where has Flagpole been? Did he leave us permanently? His track record, let's explore:

1) Donald Trump would win the 2016 election. WRONG

2) Donald Trump would not serve out his entire first term. SOON-TO-BE WRONG

3) Mueller was coming and the clown was done. WRONG

4) Trump will be impeached. WRONG

5) Calling women "whores" was becoming of a gentleman. WRONG

6) Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president. WRONG (From Mueller himself!)

There are others but just reveals the depths of his Wrongness.

These are called Flagpolian Flops.

"6) Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president. WRONG (From Mueller himself!)"

You are wrong. The fact that you and people like you believe this shows your lack of intelligence and reading comprehension. Please repeat 5th grade.

Alan

Here is a liberal rag saying it would cost $93 trillion. That is a very liberal rag. That would be about $70,000 for every one of us.

semsurr wrote:

Gordon Frank wrote:

But you're surely right. Letting illegals in has got to be the stupidest thing that both Obama and Hillary wanted to do. Why?

FOR VOTES!

Fool. Asylum seekers are NOT illegals. And the STUPIDEST thing done by any president is Trump's longtime practice of hiring illegals to work for him. The only reason Trump incorrectly spews that asylum seekers are illegals is

FOR VOTES!!!

you're wrong. try again snowflake

Runningart2004 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

These are called Flagpolian Flops.

"6) Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president. WRONG (From Mueller himself!)"

You are wrong. The fact that you and people like you believe this shows your lack of intelligence and reading comprehension. Please repeat 5th grade.

Alan

Alan, Nadler referred to an exchange with Meuller and Lieu. There was some confusion. MUeller SPECIFICALLY SAID that the argument that Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president was wrong. Alan, if you keep saying this you are doing very bad. Quit!

for the record, the ones trump doesn't have yet but has agitated for:

5) controlled mass media. But he has Fox and has railed against the 1st amendment and journalism.

9) he's not suppressing labor power - or at least no more than usual. But labor has very little power in the US so it's an asterisk category. it's already done for him.

formerly present wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The Dem candidates want open [borders]. . .

Please name two Democratic candidates who are on record as *actually* favoring "open borders." A link would be great, too.

Thanks!

Are you that ignorant? Yes, you are. Congrats!

Hillary wanted a wall, oh I forgot, it's a barrier, that's different. She wanted a chainlink fence for them to walk over. LOL! Liberals are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

Sally Vix wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

"6) Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president. WRONG (From Mueller himself!)"

You are wrong. The fact that you and people like you believe this shows your lack of intelligence and reading comprehension. Please repeat 5th grade.

Alan

Alan, Nadler referred to an exchange with Meuller and Lieu. There was some confusion. MUeller SPECIFICALLY SAID that the argument that Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president was wrong. Alan, if you keep saying this you are doing very bad. Quit!

Mueller refused to say one way or another if Trump would 100% have been indicted if he werent' president. Of course he would have tho - we have a letter signed by hundreds and hundreds of former prosecutors saying Trump would have been indicted. Rs and Ds together.

So clearly, it is fair to say trump would have been indicted but for the memo deciding not to indict sitting presidents.

Sally Vix wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

"6) Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president. WRONG (From Mueller himself!)"

You are wrong. The fact that you and people like you believe this shows your lack of intelligence and reading comprehension. Please repeat 5th grade.

Alan

Alan, Nadler referred to an exchange with Meuller and Lieu. There was some confusion. MUeller SPECIFICALLY SAID that the argument that Trump would have been indicted if not a sitting president was wrong. Alan, if you keep saying this you are doing very bad. Quit!

Alan just likes to hear himself talk and reread his pathetic posts. It's a liberal thing;)

Earth to Alan, you're not 1/100th as bright as Trump is. Give it a rest tubs.

If AOC's GND was passed by the Senate, 100-0, nothing would happen. It's just a list of goals without details or costs. There is no first step. How do you mobilize the country like it was for WW2? Where do all the workers come from that would be needed to retrofit every building in the U.S.?