The Adult says because you’re more likely to die falling off a ladder than to be shot and killed by the police that there is nothing to see here in terms of remedying police brutality. Move along children…
-
21
-
Jaere wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Oh he wore cops are pigs socks because he respects the police. Got it.
He knelt for "lack of accountability in law enforcement, police brutality, racial inequality and social injustice"
And everything on the list is BS.
Yes, for a racist like you, “racial inequality and social injustice are BS.”
None of the data is on your side which is why all of your posts are insults.
I treat you idiots the way you treat others.
24 -
Jaere wrote:
The Adult says because you’re more likely to die falling off a ladder than to be shot and killed by the police that there is nothing to see here in terms of remedying police brutality. Move along children…
There's about 50,000 things more dangerous to black people in America than cops yet every moron on the planet thinks cops are hunting black people in the streets.
It's all BS spit out by the media to divide people.
The actual DATA tells a different story.
48 -
Jaere wrote:
The Adult says because you’re more likely to die falling off a ladder than to be shot and killed by the police that there is nothing to see here in terms of remedying police brutality. Move along children…
The leading cause of death for black males from birth to age 44 is homicide by another black male.
Cops aren't the problem. Lack of cops and lack of parents is the problem.
36 -
The Adults says that surveys say that 75% of blacks were somewhat satisfied with slavery. What a crock of shlt!
41 -
Jaere wrote:
The Adults says that surveys say that 75% of blacks were somewhat satisfied with slavery. What a crock of shlt!
There's a reason you can only insult me or make up things I didn't say to refute.
You're a fool.
28 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Jaere wrote:
The Adults says that surveys say that 75% of blacks were somewhat satisfied with slavery. What a crock of shlt!
There's a reason you can only insult me or make up things I didn't say to refute.
You're a fool.
FBI Crime statistics are not a "survey".
You consider the CDC to be the unassailable gospel on COVID numbers but you think the white supremacist wing of the CDC handles the cause of death department eh?
12 -
Jaere wrote:
The Adult says because you’re more likely to die falling off a ladder than to be shot and killed by the police that there is nothing to see here in terms of remedying police brutality. Move along children…
There is guaranteed to be police brutality if Trump gets arrested. Several GOP leaders and key commentators, right and left, have said we should expect widespread violence if this arrest happens. It will be seen as an overt act by authoritarian government against the civil liberties of private citizens. But liberals just keep pretending it's nothing.
09 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
There's a reason you can only insult me or make up things I didn't say to refute.
You're a fool.
FBI Crime statistics are not a "survey".
You consider the CDC to be the unassailable gospel on COVID numbers but you think the white supremacist wing of the CDC handles the cause of death department eh?
Get a job dude. You are constantly lying too. You have no idea what my views are about the CDC. You claim to have a wife and kids and a job but you never work and that family wants nothing to do with you.
41 -
Jaere wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
FBI Crime statistics are not a "survey".
You consider the CDC to be the unassailable gospel on COVID numbers but you think the white supremacist wing of the CDC handles the cause of death department eh?
Get a job dude. You are constantly lying too. You have no idea what my views are about the CDC. You claim to have a wife and kids and a job but you never work and that family wants nothing to do with you.
He singlehandedly derailed this discussion. Mods should put an end to this.
It's as if he works for some right wing Pac to protect and further their views.
Frankly, it doesn't matter if he does, he's killing the unfettered exchange of ideas, and this should be sufficient cause to limit his ability to do so.
30 -
Jaere wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
FBI Crime statistics are not a "survey".
You consider the CDC to be the unassailable gospel on COVID numbers but you think the white supremacist wing of the CDC handles the cause of death department eh?
Get a job dude. You are constantly lying too. You have no idea what my views are about the CDC. You claim to have a wife and kids and a job but you never work and that family wants nothing to do with you.
When confronted with data you don't like you insult me and attack my family.
And you wonder why I treat you disgusting people with contempt.
19 -
sayer of what must be said: wrote:
Jaere wrote:
Get a job dude. You are constantly lying too. You have no idea what my views are about the CDC. You claim to have a wife and kids and a job but you never work and that family wants nothing to do with you.
He singlehandedly derailed this discussion. Mods should put an end to this.
It's as if he works for some right wing Pac to protect and further their views.
Frankly, it doesn't matter if he does, he's killing the unfettered exchange of ideas, and this should be sufficient cause to limit his ability to do so.
LOL!
In your tiny diseased little mind the "unfettered exchange of ideas" means only hearing opinions you agree with.
17 -
rojo wrote:
I've always thought it was embarrassing that the two people nominated for president in 2016 were Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton and joked it would be great to see both end up in prison.
Well Trump is saying he'll be arrested on Tuesday for paying Stormy Daniels to stay quiet about their affair. Now, while my disgust for Trump and Hilary stemmed from my belief that that the Presidency should be reserved for the best of the best and we have 300 million to choose from,and I was choosing these two would be at the bottomof the list, but I'm not a fan of this Trump arrest.
When electing people, we should hold the candidates to a very high standard. But we should not be prosecuting them for stuff they wouldn't be prosecuted for as normal citizens. That ends up turning the US into a kangaroo court wher the parties just jail the other side once they gain power.
The logic for calling Trump's payment to Stormy a felony election law crime is a stretch.
Reason Mag wrote:
It looks like Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, intends to pursue criminal charges against former President Donald Trump. But the charges he seems to have in mind, based on a 2016 hush payment to porn star Stormy Daniels, are so iffy that they reinforce Trump's reflexive complaint that he is, as always, the victim of a long-running Democratic "witch hunt."
Daniels claims she had a sexual affair with Trump in 2006, when he was married to his current wife, former First Lady Melania Trump. Although Trump denies the affair, he arranged a $130,000 payment to Daniels in the fall of 2016 to keep her story out of the press. There is nothing inherently illegal about that payment. But Michael Cohen, the Trump lawyer who paid off Daniels and was reimbursed by Trump, pleaded guilty in 2018 to violating federal law by making an excessive campaign contribution.
The theory underlying that charge was that Cohen "contributed" the hush money at Trump's behest for the "principal purpose of influencing [the] election," as opposed to avoiding personal embarrassment for Trump or sparing Melania Trump's feelings. As former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith noted at the time, that interpretation was open to question.
"The best interpretation of the law is that it simply is not a campaign expense to pay blackmail for things that happened years before one's candidacy—and thus nothing Cohen (or, in this case, Trump, too) did is a campaign finance crime," Smith wrote in a 2018 Reason essay. "But at a minimum, it is unclear whether paying blackmail to a mistress is 'for the purpose of influencing an election,' and so must be paid with campaign funds, or a 'personal use,' and so prohibited from being paid with campaign funds."If you are going to go out of your way to charge Trump, then certainly Hilary needs to be arrrested for her emails. The head of the FBI basicallys aid what she did was a crime, he just didn't think it was one that warranted prosecution as she didn't do it intentionally.
PS. I guess counter argument would be we need to hold our candidates to even higher standards? I guess that would be ok if we then applied that to everyone, not just the candidates we most dislike. So if you do Trump, you also need to do Hillary.
Sorry Rojo, that you couldn't archive your goal today.
50 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Jaere wrote:
Get a job dude. You are constantly lying too. You have no idea what my views are about the CDC. You claim to have a wife and kids and a job but you never work and that family wants nothing to do with you.
When confronted with data you don't like you insult me and attack my family.
And you wonder why I treat you disgusting people with contempt.
Only a Narcissist such as yourself would perceive someone saying your family doesn’t want anything to do with you as an attack on them. I was actually complimenting them.
50 -
sayer of what must be said: wrote:
He [MORONintheROOM] singlehandedly derailed this discussion. Mods should put an end to this.
It's as if he works for some right wing Pac to protect and further their views.
Frankly, it doesn't matter if he does, he's killing the unfettered exchange of ideas, and this should be sufficient cause to limit his ability to do so.
A thread started to get around this child clown's derailing was deleted by the mods. And they can't figure out why people say the mods are biased. The simple solution is to permanently ban the IdiotInTheRoom, instead they are protecting it.
51 -
10
-
absolute cream of human fitness wrote:
Sorry Rojo, that you couldn't archive your goal today.
Or even half of his goal, unless Hillary got arrested and I didn't hear. Better luck tomorrow, rojo!
40 -
Ronald Dump wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
He is facing rape allegations in a defamation case. That's a little harder to buy off.
That's a civil case. It may cost more but he'll settle.
I doubt the complainant will accept that. When he loses he will then be exposed to a criminal prosecution. Along with all the other cases against him.
31 -
Not a Trump fan, but didn't the Feds back off of this case? Claiming state jurisdiction after Federal release means it is not a strong case. The fact that Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels will testify doesn't help. They are perhaps lower character than Trump, which is a tough bar to clear.
Trump is going to declare that it is a non-disclosure agreement, something that the DAs and many lawyers do themselves in contracts everyday. This is perhaps why the Feds didn't pursue it.
If he wins, this kind of thing energizes his base. I question the strategy.
This post was edited 48 seconds after it was posted.10
1 post was removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.