agip wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Robert Mueller participated in the Robert Mueller probe without having an inkling of what was going on. I say that half in jest. I do read the news. I probably read more news here than anyone else.
dodge, weave, divert, change subject, lie, brag.
A true spankist.
What the heck is a "spankist?" Have you Liberals really developed a "vocabulary" for things Trump? Are you really that looney?
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
just remember that Trump asked for Russian help, received Russian help, expressed gratitude to them for it, and afterwards said he'd do it again. Mueller said all that was illegal and wrong.
Also remember that the Republican Party is doing what it can to stop tightening election security.
These are the people who are supposed to be serving us.
Laughable. The Repubs are doing what it can to stop tightening election security? Just laughable. Dems want felons to vote. Dems want illegals to vote. Dems want anyone who is not a citizen to vote. All because those people will vote Dem. Just a shame what the Democratic party has become. Repubs are for laws and justice. We want our voter laws followed closely. No ID? Dems don't care. Just vote Dem. Who in this day and age has no ID? You need an ID to drive, or to collect social security, or to get SNAP, or for welfare, or to cash a check, or to do anything. Who has no ID?????
Millions of US citizens have no government-issued photo ID, that's who. Republicans don't want those citizens to vote.
Democrats do not want non-citizens to vote. We only want felons to vote if they have fully paid their debt to society.
You know all this and yet you continue to lie about it, Lyin' Sally.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Laughable. The Repubs are doing what it can to stop tightening election security? Just laughable. Dems want felons to vote. Dems want illegals to vote. Dems want anyone who is not a citizen to vote. All because those people will vote Dem. Just a shame what the Democratic party has become. Repubs are for laws and justice. We want our voter laws followed closely. No ID? Dems don't care. Just vote Dem. Who in this day and age has no ID? You need an ID to drive, or to collect social security, or to get SNAP, or for welfare, or to cash a check, or to do anything. Who has no ID?????
Millions of US citizens have no government-issued photo ID, that's who. Republicans don't want those citizens to vote.
Democrats do not want non-citizens to vote. We only want felons to vote if they have fully paid their debt to society.
You know all this and yet you continue to lie about it, Lyin' Sally.
Who the helll has no ID? Tell me how they can get exist with no ID. Quit calling me Lying Sally - you sack of .....
Fat hurts wrote:
agip wrote:
what kind of a crazy party suffers a blow when tailpipe emissions are reduced?
I mean seriously.
"Four of the world’s largest automakers struck a deal with California to reduce tailpipe pollution, in a blow to the Trump administration.
Breaking7m ago"
Yes, this developing story has been really interesting, though I haven't read the NYT article you are referring to.
Tiny's administration has been working hard to roll back fuel economy standards. They are trying to take away California's ability to set its own emissions standards, which affects other states that decide to follow California emissions (known as CARB states).
So Tiny wants to fight for dirty air, but that's not really what the auto makers want. They just want to be able to have the same standards nationwide. They want to be able to build a single car that they can sell everywhere instead of having one car for the CARB states and one for all the other states.
So it was in the automaker's interest to just side with California rather than endure a long legal battle between CARB states and Tiny's government. That means everyone will get cleaner air.
When Tiny loses, America wins.
The CARB group represents 13 states and D.C. They account for about 50% of all car sales in the U.S.
Another Republican outed wrote:
Bill Sanderson, age 59, a Tennessee Republican, who is a rabid Anti-LGBTQ, has resigned in disgrace. He was caught sexually explicate messages to men 40 years younger than he is on Grindr--the gay hookup site.
https://carigervin.substack.com/p/no-13-while-voting-for-anti-lgbt
Why does this same story keep coming up every so often? It's like a fill-in-the-blanks game.
______ _________, a Republican politician, who is rabidly Anti-LGBTQ, has resigned in disgrace when it was revealed that he is actually gay himself.........
Fat hurts wrote:
agip wrote:
what kind of a crazy party suffers a blow when tailpipe emissions are reduced?
I mean seriously.
"Four of the world’s largest automakers struck a deal with California to reduce tailpipe pollution, in a blow to the Trump administration.
Breaking7m ago"
Yes, this developing story has been really interesting, though I haven't read the NYT article you are referring to.
Tiny's administration has been working hard to roll back fuel economy standards. They are trying to take away California's ability to set its own emissions standards, which affects other states that decide to follow California emissions (known as CARB states).
So Tiny wants to fight for dirty air, but that's not really what the auto makers want. They just want to be able to have the same standards nationwide. They want to be able to build a single car that they can sell everywhere instead of having one car for the CARB states and one for all the other states.
So it was in the automaker's interest to just side with California rather than endure a long legal battle between CARB states and Tiny's government. That means everyone will get cleaner air.
When Tiny loses, America wins.
California has had stricter emissions standards than the EPA for a while and it's basically the reason European cars get neutered before they're imported here. The whole thing is a huge state run pay-to-play racket of one waiver after another
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
dodge, weave, divert, change subject, lie, brag.
A true spankist.
What the heck is a "spankist?" Have you Liberals really developed a "vocabulary" for things Trump? Are you really that looney?
Sally why do you participate in a political thread if you don't read the news? Serious question.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/stormy-daniels-spanked-donald-trump-with-trump-magazineand-a-picture-of-his-own-faceSally Vix wrote:
Sometimes I think I might be too intelligent and too insightful for this thread.
Intelligent? No. Insightful? No. A 2-bit troll? You have potential
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Millions of US citizens have no government-issued photo ID, that's who. Republicans don't want those citizens to vote.
Democrats do not want non-citizens to vote. We only want felons to vote if they have fully paid their debt to society.
You know all this and yet you continue to lie about it, Lyin' Sally.
Who the helll has no ID? Tell me how they can get exist with no ID. Quit calling me Lying Sally - you sack of .....
It turns out that roughly 3 million adult American citizens do not have a government issued ID.
"The most common form of government-issued ID are driver's licenses and so the people who are most unlikely to drive, as it is, is elderly, the poor, people who live in big cities, like African-Americans, especially young people, too, especially if they attend college. They may not have need for a car at the moment."
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/01/146204308/why-millions-of-americans-have-no-government-idShall we try dealing with facts now?
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Millions of US citizens have no government-issued photo ID, that's who. Republicans don't want those citizens to vote.
Democrats do not want non-citizens to vote. We only want felons to vote if they have fully paid their debt to society.
You know all this and yet you continue to lie about it, Lyin' Sally.
Who the helll has no ID? Tell me how they can get exist with no ID. Quit calling me Lying Sally - you sack of .....
Hi lying sally, I thought you said you were well read.. go get a single fkn clue then post on these issues
Just sayin'... wrote:
Pro-Life Sally wrote:
What do the Pro-Life Trumpers have to say about Anti-Life Trump? Come on Sally. Come on Rigged. Tells all how you will still support Trump for KILLING people who were born ALIVE as BABIES!
Okay, this is just disingenuous.
You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.
Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .
That's completely wrong.
As a pro-lifer myself, I can tell you that the whole reason for my stance is because I believe that human life is sacred.
That means we have no right to terminate a life, except under a few extreme circumstances.
It bothers me that both parties are wrong on this. Either human life is sacred or it's not. Pick a side.
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
Sally Vix wrote:
Sometimes I think I might be too intelligent and too insightful for this thread.
Sometimes I think Sally is seriously delusional. Seriously. Real mental issues. Get help.
Fat hurts wrote:
Just sayin'... wrote:
Okay, this is just disingenuous.
You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.
Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .
That's completely wrong.
As a pro-lifer myself, I can tell you that the whole reason for my stance is because I believe that human life is sacred.
That means we have no right to terminate a life, except under a few extreme circumstances.
It bothers me that both parties are wrong on this. Either human life is sacred or it's not. Pick a side.
Two sides ... conservatives like me are against abortion. The left/radical left is okay extinguishing a baby boy or girl who is born alive. Which side would you say is right in God's eyes?
Fat hurts wrote:
Just sayin'... wrote:
Okay, this is just disingenuous.
You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.
Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .
That's completely wrong.
As a pro-lifer myself, I can tell you that the whole reason for my stance is because I believe that human life is sacred.
That means we have no right to terminate a life, except under a few extreme circumstances.
It bothers me that both parties are wrong on this. Either human life is sacred or it's not. Pick a side.
Sorry that it bothers you. Perhaps you are looking for consistency without any real justification for it. Maybe start by edfining "sacred". See where it gets you.
P wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Who the helll has no ID? Tell me how they can get exist with no ID. Quit calling me Lying Sally - you sack of .....
It turns out that roughly 3 million adult American citizens do not have a government issued ID.
"The most common form of government-issued ID are driver's licenses and so the people who are most unlikely to drive, as it is, is elderly, the poor, people who live in big cities, like African-Americans, especially young people, too, especially if they attend college. They may not have need for a car at the moment."
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/01/146204308/why-millions-of-americans-have-no-government-idShall we try dealing with facts now?
Don’t hold your breaths for lyin Sally to respond
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Sometimes I think I might be too intelligent and too insightful for this thread.
Sometimes I think Sally is seriously delusional. Seriously. Real mental issues. Get help.
Sally, is a very conservative who is astounded what Liberals are willing to do. Kill babies who survive botched abortions, open the borders and give free health care to every one who comes across the Rio, etc ., etc. just too much for me.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Millions of US citizens have no government-issued photo ID, that's who. Republicans don't want those citizens to vote.
Democrats do not want non-citizens to vote. We only want felons to vote if they have fully paid their debt to society.
You know all this and yet you continue to lie about it, Lyin' Sally.
Who the helll has no ID? Tell me how they can get exist with no ID. Quit calling me Lying Sally - you sack of .....
Millions of Americans have no government issued ID. Look it up. We have no national ID in this country and millions of adults don't drive. I know you won't believe it if I post a link so look it up yourself on a web site you trust.
I'll keep calling you Lyin' Sally as long as you continue to lie. You are constantly telling lies that have been debunked over and over on this thread.
Fat hurts wrote:
Just sayin'... wrote:
Okay, this is just disingenuous.
You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.
Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .
That's completely wrong.
As a pro-lifer myself, I can tell you that the whole reason for my stance is because I believe that human life is sacred.
That means we have no right to terminate a life, except under a few extreme circumstances.
It bothers me that both parties are wrong on this. Either human life is sacred or it's not. Pick a side.
In this case the extreme circumstances are that FIVE people need to be put to death to match the Central Park FIVE Trump wanted to wrongly put to death. Trump was wrong, but he needs FIVE people put to death to prove he was right.
Double headed eagle from the Russian coat of arms.
Holding golf clubs in one claw and money in the other.
There are hammers sickles (Soviet) in place of stars on the flag.
Words in Spanish that read "45 is a puppet"
