Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ignorant Repubs wrote:

Spineless Dems wrote:

I keep hearing that Pelosi won't impeach because she wants the voters to decide to not to have him back.

Nope. It is to keep Trump from having impeachment manna to feed his rabid base. Don't feed the base and a lot fewer Trumpanzees will vote in 2020.

And if it was his second term and re-election wasn't an issue how would that matter?

agip wrote:

just remember that Trump asked for Russian help, received Russian help, expressed gratitude to them for it, and afterwards said he'd do it again. Mueller said all that was illegal and wrong.

Also remember that the Republican Party is doing what it can to stop tightening election security.

These are the people who are supposed to be serving us.

Laughable. The Repubs are doing what it can to stop tightening election security? Just laughable. Dems want felons to vote. Dems want illegals to vote. Dems want anyone who is not a citizen to vote. All because those people will vote Dem. Just a shame what the Democratic party has become. Repubs are for laws and justice. We want our voter laws followed closely. No ID? Dems don't care. Just vote Dem. Who in this day and age has no ID? You need an ID to drive, or to collect social security, or to get SNAP, or for welfare, or to cash a check, or to do anything. Who has no ID?????

The Nazis—they call themselves Republicans in the U.S.—have reinstated, after 16-years, the Federal death penalty. Billy Barr not only brought it back, but he also scheduled FIVE executions at the same time. The last Federal execution occurred in 2003; Bush v2 put a stop to that ugly practice.

If you know your history at all, Trump called for the immediate execution of the Central Park FIVE. Never mind that those five would have been wrongly executed because they did not commit the crimes Trump, to this day, insists they did—fake DNA evidence must be Trump's claim.

It seems any FIVE executions is what Trump wants. That is the only way to ease his pain of not convincing the U.S> tp murder the Central Park FIVE.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ag-barr-orders-reinstatement-federal-death-penalty-n1034451

Spineless Dems wrote:

Ignorant Repubs wrote:

Don't feed the base and a lot fewer Trumpanzees will vote in 2020.

And if it was his second term and re-election wasn't an issue how would that matter?

2020 is a number you cannot grasp.

You can't grasp the word "if" in my scenario?

"If" he wasn't up for re-election what would be the reason for not impeaching?

Bill Sanderson, age 59, a Tennessee Republican, who is a rabid Anti-LGBTQ, has resigned in disgrace. He was caught sexually explicate messages to men 40 years younger than he is on Grindr--the gay hookup site.

https://carigervin.substack.com/p/no-13-while-voting-for-anti-lgbt

Spineless Dems wrote:

You can't grasp the word "if" in my scenario?

"If" he wasn't up for re-election what would be the reason for not impeaching?

There is no "if" in 2020.

Republican Death Squad wrote:

The Nazis—they call themselves Republicans in the U.S.—have reinstated, after 16-years, the Federal death penalty. Billy Barr not only brought it back, but he also scheduled FIVE executions at the same time. The last Federal execution occurred in 2003; Bush v2 put a stop to that ugly practice.

If you know your history at all, Trump called for the immediate execution of the Central Park FIVE. Never mind that those five would have been wrongly executed because they did not commit the crimes Trump, to this day, insists they did—fake DNA evidence must be Trump's claim.

It seems any FIVE executions is what Trump wants. That is the only way to ease his pain of not convincing the U.S> tp murder the Central Park FIVE.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ag-barr-orders-reinstatement-federal-death-penalty-n1034451

What do the Pro-Life Trumpers have to say about Anti-Life Trump? Come on Sally. Come on Rigged. Tells all how you will still support Trump for KILLING people who were born ALIVE as BABIES!

Pro-Life Sally wrote:

What do the Pro-Life Trumpers have to say about Anti-Life Trump? Come on Sally. Come on Rigged. Tells all how you will still support Trump for KILLING people who were born ALIVE as BABIES!

Okay, this is just disingenuous.

You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.

Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .

Just sayin'... wrote:

Pro-Life Sally wrote:

What do the Pro-Life Trumpers have to say about Anti-Life Trump? Come on Sally. Come on Rigged. Tells all how you will still support Trump for KILLING people who were born ALIVE as BABIES!

Okay, this is just disingenuous.

You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.

Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .

So, you are100% OKAY with killing BABIES who were born ALIVE because it is OKAY to kill them. And you still WORSHIP Trump. You are one IGNORANT Trump Fanboy.

Pro-Life Sally wrote:

Just sayin'... wrote:

Okay, this is just disingenuous.

You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.

Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .

So, you are100% OKAY with killing BABIES who were born ALIVE because it is OKAY to kill them. And you still WORSHIP Trump. You are one IGNORANT Trump Fanboy.

+1

He is a Pro-Life Republican who is Anti-Life.

Democrats lose again

Just sayin'... wrote:

Pro-Life Sally wrote:

What do the Pro-Life Trumpers have to say about Anti-Life Trump? Come on Sally. Come on Rigged. Tells all how you will still support Trump for KILLING people who were born ALIVE as BABIES!

Okay, this is just disingenuous.

You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB), so that the "dirty sluts" who engage in sex (including with their husbands) can be punished by being responsible for another human being for at least 18 years.

Once the 18 years of punishment are over, however, the PFBers see no particular reason to keep the result of that birth alive. Death penalty? Okay, that's one way to go . . .

Sorry, but your post is a failure on so many levels.

Let's start with "You know very well that the so-called "Pro-Life" folks are just pro-forced-birth (PFB)". Besides being transparently false, this is a classic, irrefutably invalid method of argument. You simply cannot assign motivation to the "other". It is 100% invalid.

Well, I guess that you can assign such motivation. But then that would identify you as a dishonest person.

Try arguing on the merits of the topic at hand. If you are unable to do so, perhaps you might try taking a moment for self-reflection - why are you unable to argue your point using facts and valid logic?

Sally why do you participate in a political thread if you don't read the news? Serious question.

Republicans in the senate have been fighting additional election security and Trump has recently again invited Russia to help Republicans get elected.

I'm not talking at all about voter suppression, which is an entirely different subject.

Robert Mueller participated in the Robert Mueller probe without having an inkling of what was going on. I say that half in jest. I do read the news. I probably read more news here than anyone else.

Sometimes I think I might be too intelligent and too insightful for this thread.

agip wrote:

what kind of a crazy party suffers a blow when tailpipe emissions are reduced?

I mean seriously.

"Four of the world’s largest automakers struck a deal with California to reduce tailpipe pollution, in a blow to the Trump administration.

Breaking7m ago"

Yes, this developing story has been really interesting, though I haven't read the NYT article you are referring to.

Tiny's administration has been working hard to roll back fuel economy standards. They are trying to take away California's ability to set its own emissions standards, which affects other states that decide to follow California emissions (known as CARB states).

So Tiny wants to fight for dirty air, but that's not really what the auto makers want. They just want to be able to have the same standards nationwide. They want to be able to build a single car that they can sell everywhere instead of having one car for the CARB states and one for all the other states.

So it was in the automaker's interest to just side with California rather than endure a long legal battle between CARB states and Tiny's government. That means everyone will get cleaner air.

When Tiny loses, America wins.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

Sally why do you participate in a political thread if you don't read the news? Serious question.

Republicans in the senate have been fighting additional election security and Trump has recently again invited Russia to help Republicans get elected.

I'm not talking at all about voter suppression, which is an entirely different subject.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/07/us/politics/election-security-mitch-mcconnell.html

Robert Mueller participated in the Robert Mueller probe without having an inkling of what was going on. I say that half in jest. I do read the news. I probably read more news here than anyone else.

dodge, weave, divert, change subject, lie, brag.

A true spankist.

If they catch the hackers who put “45 is a puppet” on that Presidential Seal, I’m guessing they’ll the Truth Defense.