Sally Vix wrote:
Let's just look at 3. I asked for specific examples and your answer was "...found in violation of the constituion (sic) multiple times by federal courts. Do you not know what "specific" means?
Hey, grammar school girl, Sally! You have a floating " (sic). They come in pairs.
Sally Vix wrote:
sally don't read wrote:
You never read the Mueller report. You are not qualified to make any comparisons, especially without waiting to hear any Mueller actually says; instead relying on Fox News to feed you with fake news .
I have not watched Fox News in years. If I watch a "news" program 95% of the time it is MSNBC (which ceased being a news program the day Trump won the election and instead became a propaganda outfit devoted 24/7 to trashing Trump) and CNN 5% of the time. My friends are mystified why I watch MSNBC all the time and I am not sure I can explain why either. But, I have not watched Fox News in years.
Translation - you read FOX 95% of the time and RT the other 5%. And you don’t read.
here there wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Please provide the following:
1) Specific examples of campaign finance law violations.
2) Specific examples of emolument clause violations
3) Specific examples of agitations (?) against the Constitution
4) Specific examples of obstruction of justice - Not what others have said. What you found when YOU read the Mueller report.
Thanks in advance.
1) Cohen is in jail for the campaign finance violations he did on behalf and at the direction of Trump
2) He has used his presidency for his hotel business
3) Went past Congress to order funds for a border wall
4) Ordered Mueller to be fired
Don’t expect a response from sally
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
seriously? Do you not keep up with the news?
3) Trump has been found in violation of the constituion multiple times by federal courts. How do you not know this?
.
Let's just look at 3. I asked for specific examples and your answer was "...found in violation of the constituion (sic) multiple times by federal courts. Do you not know what "specific" means?
so you admit the other three.
ok so now you'll admit the fourth.
but fair question.
Trump's travel ban1.0, trump's stealing money for the border wall, trump's citizenship question on the census....all that was found in violation of the constitution.
here there wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Please provide the following:
1) Specific examples of campaign finance law violations.
2) Specific examples of emolument clause violations
3) Specific examples of agitations (?) against the Constitution
4) Specific examples of obstruction of justice - Not what others have said. What you found when YOU read the Mueller report.
Thanks in advance.
1) Cohen is in jail for the campaign finance violations he did on behalf and at the direction of Trump
2) He has used his presidency for his hotel business
3) Went past Congress to order funds for a border wall
4) Ordered Mueller to be fired
Strong work Sally, strong work ???
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
What's next, will he expand funding for Planned Parenthood too? LMAO!!!!!
If it serves his personal purpose, he will gladly expand funding for Planned Parenthood.
Tiny was pro-choice until he considered running for president as a Republican in 2012. He doesn't really care about Planned Parenthood one way or the other.
agip wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Mueller does appear to be much older than he has before. Not great optics.
Ultimately this doesn't really help Trumpists though, not to any large degree.
What is most likely at this point is that this is just a step toward the House beginning impeachment proceedings. It will likely do that before they recess in August. The House will impeach.
Mueller just made crystal clear that Trump can be charged with obstruction once he is out of office. This makes the 2020 election even more important now that he has stated that out loud.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done. He is ultimately going to prison.
I do think the Ds will impeach...Nadler has been quietly moving to the pro-impeach side and he'd run the show.
I think when the house comes back for the fall they'll do it.
I think they have to. Clearlly he obstructed justice. Clearly he broke campaign finance laws. Clearly he has agitated against the Constitution and is probably in direct violation of the emoluments clause.
That alone is enough and makes it the duty of congress to impeach. Shouldn't establish a precedent of 'look the other way' ism.
The only reason the Ds might not impeach is if a Dem takes a commanding lead by September and things look smooth sailing. But I doubt that will happen.
Yes. They have to do it as I have said for a long time. The timing is not 100% clear, but it seems to me that after this Mueller testimony, there is no reason to wait. As long as it happens though, fine by me. Trump clearly broke the law, most especially with regard to Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering. Both are serious crimes. The House will impeach.
Trump will ultimately go to prison (unless he dies first or criminal or space alien behavior prevent it).
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
I do think the Ds will impeach...Nadler has been quietly moving to the pro-impeach side and he'd run the show.
I think when the house comes back for the fall they'll do it.
I think they have to. Clearlly he obstructed justice. Clearly he broke campaign finance laws. Clearly he has agitated against the Constitution and is probably in direct violation of the emoluments clause.
That alone is enough and makes it the duty of congress to impeach. Shouldn't establish a precedent of 'look the other way' ism.
The only reason the Ds might not impeach is if a Dem takes a commanding lead by September and things look smooth sailing. But I doubt that will happen.
Please provide the following:
1) Specific examples of campaign finance law violations.
2) Specific examples of emolument clause violations
3) Specific examples of agitations (?) against the Constitution
4) Specific examples of obstruction of justice - Not what others have said. What you found when YOU read the Mueller report.
Thanks in advance.
You are an idiot.
Regardless of Mueller....Trump will be president until January 2025 (or longer). Our version of Putin.
Flagpole wrote:
I will let you all know when Mueller has arrived.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Either Mueller is senile or he is lying. Over and over again he could not remember even the most basic facts of his own report when questioned by a Republican. And yet if there was a question from a Democrat which attacked the president with regards to the report he had perfect recollection.
It's not that he doesn't remember. He refuses to rely on his memory for fear of making a mistake. His stock answer is, "See the report".
The questions from Democrats tend to come directly from the report. So he just says, "Yes, that's what the report says."
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Either Mueller is senile or he is lying. Over and over again he could not remember even the most basic facts of his own report when questioned by a Republican. And yet if there was a question from a Democrat which attacked the president with regards to the report he had perfect recollection.
It's not that he doesn't remember. He refuses to rely on his memory for fear of making a mistake. His stock answer is, "See the report".
The questions from Democrats tend to come directly from the report. So he just says, "Yes, that's what the report says."
Boom!
Chris Wallace (who is no fan of Trump)- "...disaster for Democrats and disaster for Mueller’s Reputation."
“Mueller doesn’t know what’s in his report, a staff - driven report."
When You lose Chris Wallace COMPLETELY it’s time to shut it down, Dimwits.
Trump wins, Trump wins again!
if wallace wants to be considered a "respected" journalist he best keep his opinions to himself considering he continues to associate with FOX Propaganda it's clear he doesn't care to be considered a respected journalist
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
It's not that he doesn't remember. He refuses to rely on his memory for fear of making a mistake. His stock answer is, "See the report".
The questions from Democrats tend to come directly from the report. So he just says, "Yes, that's what the report says."
Boom!
Chris Wallace (who is no fan of Trump)- "...disaster for Democrats and disaster for Mueller’s Reputation."
“Mueller doesn’t know what’s in his report, a staff - driven report."
When You lose Chris Wallace COMPLETELY it’s time to shut it down, Dimwits.
Trump wins, Trump wins again!
chris walllaaaasss wrote:
if wallace wants to be considered a "respected" journalist he best keep his opinions to himself
considering he continues to associate with FOX Propaganda it's clear he doesn't care to be considered a respected journalist
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Boom!
Chris Wallace (who is no fan of Trump)- "...disaster for Democrats and disaster for Mueller’s Reputation."
“Mueller doesn’t know what’s in his report, a staff - driven report."
When You lose Chris Wallace COMPLETELY it’s time to shut it down, Dimwits.
Trump wins, Trump wins again!
Even David Axelrod of CNN, commented on Mueller, "this is very, very painful"
Just face it Dems, you lost today.
Hey Clownpole! When is Mueller coming? LOL!!!!
David axelrod isn't a serious journalist, or even a pretend journalist for that matter. what point are you trying to make? or are you just repeating other opinions again?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
chris walllaaaasss wrote:
if wallace wants to be considered a "respected" journalist he best keep his opinions to himself
considering he continues to associate with FOX Propaganda it's clear he doesn't care to be considered a respected journalist
Even David Axelrod of CNN, commented on Mueller, "this is very, very painful"
Just face it Dems, you lost today.
Hey Clownpole! When is Mueller coming? LOL!!!!
Mueller GOES. HOME. DEVASTATED.
jaminputin wrote:
Regardless of Mueller....Trump will be president until January 2025 (or longer). Our version of Putin.
Flagpole wrote:
I will let you all know when Mueller has arrived.
I believe you are incorrect.
chris walllaaaasss wrote:
David axelrod isn't a serious journalist, or even a pretend journalist for that matter.
what point are you trying to make? or are you just repeating other opinions again?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Even David Axelrod of CNN, commented on Mueller, "this is very, very painful"
Just face it Dems, you lost today.
Hey Clownpole! When is Mueller coming? LOL!!!!
Stop deflecting, you lost BIGLY today. You are a sore liberal loser.
still awaiting your point. keep up rigged, as the thread creator implied - quality posters only...
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
chris walllaaaasss wrote:
David axelrod isn't a serious journalist, or even a pretend journalist for that matter.
what point are you trying to make? or are you just repeating other opinions again?
Stop deflecting, you lost BIGLY today. You are a sore liberal loser.
Bigly loss for the Dems today!!