Igy, Zerohedge is not an honest broker. I have no idea why you trust anything you read there. Zerohedge is an entertainment source. Not a news or research source.
This post was edited 22 seconds after it was posted.
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY/PSEUDOSCIENCE Factual Reporting: LOW Country: Bulgaria MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.
You are just pushing your politics here again. I could say more on that but I won’t.
The quote was a statement of fact, if not, you prove me wrong. The fact I gave Zerohedge credit, as I should, gives you a hard-on. Your problem, not mine.
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY/PSEUDOSCIENCE Factual Reporting: LOW Country: Bulgaria MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
I am not familiar with Zerohedge but you can say same - "false/misleading/debunked " - about MSNBC, CNN, NY Times and other liberal "news" organizations. They have purposely lied numerous times to fit their agenda.
Igy, Zerohedge is not an honest broker. I have no idea why you trust anything you read there. Zerohedge is an entertainment source. Not a news or research source.
Don't be too hard on Igy, he's having another bad day what with the markets and all.
Bias Rating: RIGHT CONSPIRACY/PSEUDOSCIENCE Factual Reporting: LOW Country: Bulgaria MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.
I am not familiar with Zerohedge but you can say same - "false/misleading/debunked " - about MSNBC, CNN, NY Times and other liberal "news" organizations. They have purposely lied numerous times to fit their agenda.
I suppose you could, but most people don't, and neither does Wikipedia.
But people be believin' what they want to believe.
I am not familiar with Zerohedge but you can say same - "false/misleading/debunked " - about MSNBC, CNN, NY Times and other liberal "news" organizations. They have purposely lied numerous times to fit their agenda.
I suppose you could, but most people don't, and neither does Wikipedia.
But people be believin' what they want to believe.
Please don't tell us you consider Wikipedia a news source.
I suppose you could, but most people don't, and neither does Wikipedia.
But people be believin' what they want to believe.
Please don't tell us you consider Wikipedia a news source.
Wikipedia is like the encyclopedia of the internet. It's generally unbiased, fair, and accountable.
There's also a site that ranks how biased each news source is, and to which side. Ranked highest were a few like NY Times. Fox News ranked poorly and Zero Hedge even worse.
I have seen a couple of these sites, though, that rank NY Times, NPR News, among others, as left leaning.
Funny really how the last several years have unraveled from BLM riots, Fauci/Covid lies, to Russia Collusion. Since you mentioned NY Times, here you go:
Interesting that you continue to push this topic today, your enamored technology industry and Silicon Valley become the focal point of the spread of disinformation, attacks on the First Amendment, in this X piece from Victor Davis Hansen.
The House Judiciary Committee just revealed how the Department of Homeland Security worked with Stanford University to form a “disinformation group.” Their agenda was to monitor and suppress unwelcome news during the 2020 election cycle. This so-called “Election Integrity Partnership”—how ironic a name—partnered with Stanford’s Internet Observatory to prep the election news cycle for Joe Biden.
Takeaways:
More evidence that the Left has perverted academia, government bureaucracies, and Big Tech to sabotage a free media.
And still more evidence that a once great Stanford University continues in free fall—after the Stanford lecturer Ameer Hasan Loggins’s in-class, anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students; the four-day hiatus before the university could condemn the Hamas massacre; the climate of fear for Jewish students on campus; the Stanford Law School/Judge Duncan fiasco; the recent leveraged resignation of president Marc Tessier-Lavigne; the Bankman-Fried Stanford law professors’ connections to their convicted felon son’s cash transfers from his historic Ponzi scheme; the Theranos debacle; and the “Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative” embarrassment, etc. Six months ago I wrote a warning about the increasing power of the Bay Area triad of Silicon Valley, Stanford University, and Bay Area politicians—and cited their efforts to undermine freedom of expression. ”
Interesting that you continue to push this topic today, your enamored technology industry and Silicon Valley become the focal point of the spread of disinformation, attacks on the First Amendment, in this X piece from Victor Davis Hansen.
The House Judiciary Committee just revealed how the Department of Homeland Security worked with Stanford University to form a “disinformation group.” Their agenda was to monitor and suppress unwelcome news during the 2020 election cycle. This so-called “Election Integrity Partnership”—how ironic a name—partnered with Stanford’s Internet Observatory to prep the election news cycle for Joe Biden.
Takeaways:
More evidence that the Left has perverted academia, government bureaucracies, and Big Tech to sabotage a free media.
And still more evidence that a once great Stanford University continues in free fall—after the Stanford lecturer Ameer Hasan Loggins’s in-class, anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students; the four-day hiatus before the university could condemn the Hamas massacre; the climate of fear for Jewish students on campus; the Stanford Law School/Judge Duncan fiasco; the recent leveraged resignation of president Marc Tessier-Lavigne; the Bankman-Fried Stanford law professors’ connections to their convicted felon son’s cash transfers from his historic Ponzi scheme; the Theranos debacle; and the “Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative” embarrassment, etc. Six months ago I wrote a warning about the increasing power of the Bay Area triad of Silicon Valley, Stanford University, and Bay Area politicians—and cited their efforts to undermine freedom of expression. ”
Earnings Scorecard: For Q3 2023 (with 92% of S&P 500 companies reporting actual results), 81% of S&P 500 companies have reported a positive EPS surprise and 61% of S&P 500 companies have reported a positive revenue surprise.
Igy, Zerohedge is not an honest broker. I have no idea why you trust anything you read there. Zerohedge is an entertainment source. Not a news or research source.
Don't be too hard on Igy, he's having another bad day what with the markets and all.
The implications for the non-magnificent 493 are good though.
Ron Baron, Baron Capital chairman and CEO, joins 'Squawk Box' from the 30th annual Baron Investment Conference to discuss the latest market trends, Baron's b...
The advance-decline statistics have a few quirks that chartists should understand. First, the Nasdaq AD Line can fall for extended periods, even if the Nasdaq itself is rising. This is because Nasdaq listing requirements are not as strict as NYSE listing requirements. The Nasdaq is full of upstarts in industries ranging from biotech to technology to alternative energy. There may be huge upside potential, but there is also a risk of absolute failure. This means more Nasdaq stocks are prone to delisting. Companies that fail are removed from the index and replaced, but their negative effect on the AD Line remains
They're also comparing A/D of the NASDAQ to the Price Index of the NASDAQ 100.
