Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

kibitzer wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Oh the Pence rule. The party under the complete control of Donald trump have members who refuse to be alone with females. Crazy stuff.

Could they be alone with a female if she was covered head to toe with no skin showing? Just asking.

I know of a religion that is very concerned about female temptations too. They found the covering of female skin to be useful. Maybe Pence should join.

Okay, I have to give the guy a break on this one.

.

It is increasingly common, in all kinds of business settings, for a male not to be alone one-on-one with a female--except in a public/visible place.

.

Years ago, a colleague had to give a female whom he was supervising some bad news: She hadn't been selected for a particular opportunity. He told her this in his office. She tore open her blouse and rushed out, claiming he'd molested her. It was a very nasty situation, and I can only imagine how much worse it would have been (for him) nowadays

.

At present one of the first pieces of advice that many a young man who's just starting in business receives . . . is never to be alone in a work situation with a female, unless they're in a place where they can be seen by others. Makes sense to me.

kibitzer wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Oh the Pence rule. The party under the complete control of Donald trump have members who refuse to be alone with females. Crazy stuff.

Could they be alone with a female if she was covered head to toe with no skin showing? Just asking.

I know of a religion that is very concerned about female temptations too. They found the covering of female skin to be useful. Maybe Pence should join.

Okay, I have to give the guy a break on this one.

.

It is increasingly common, in all kinds of business settings, for a male not to be alone one-on-one with a female--except in a public/visible place.

.

Years ago, a colleague had to give a female whom he was supervising some bad news: She hadn't been selected for a particular opportunity. He told her this in his office. She tore open her blouse and rushed out, claiming he'd molested her. It was a very nasty situation, and I can only imagine how much worse it would have been (for him) nowadays

.

At present one of the first pieces of advice that many a young man who's just starting in business receives . . . is never to be alone in a work situation with a female, unless they're in a place where they can be seen by others. Makes sense to me.

kibitzer wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Oh the Pence rule. The party under the complete control of Donald trump have members who refuse to be alone with females. Crazy stuff.

Could they be alone with a female if she was covered head to toe with no skin showing? Just asking.

I know of a religion that is very concerned about female temptations too. They found the covering of female skin to be useful. Maybe Pence should join.

Okay, I have to give the guy a break on this one.

.

It is increasingly common, in all kinds of business settings, for a male not to be alone one-on-one with a female--except in a public/visible place.

.

Years ago, a colleague had to give a female whom he was supervising some bad news: She hadn't been selected for a particular opportunity. He told her this in his office. She tore open her blouse and rushed out, claiming he'd molested her. It was a very nasty situation, and I can only imagine how much worse it would have been (for him) nowadays

.

At present one of the first pieces of advice that many a young man who's just starting in business receives . . . is never to be alone in a work situation with a female, unless they're in a place where they can be seen by others. Makes sense to me.

kibitzer wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Oh the Pence rule. The party under the complete control of Donald trump have members who refuse to be alone with females. Crazy stuff.

Could they be alone with a female if she was covered head to toe with no skin showing? Just asking.

I know of a religion that is very concerned about female temptations too. They found the covering of female skin to be useful. Maybe Pence should join.

Okay, I have to give the guy a break on this one.

.

It is increasingly common, in all kinds of business settings, for a male not to be alone one-on-one with a female--except in a public/visible place.

.

Years ago, a colleague had to give a female whom he was supervising some bad news: She hadn't been selected for a particular opportunity. He told her this in his office. She tore open her blouse and rushed out, claiming he'd molested her. It was a very nasty situation, and I can only imagine how much worse it would have been (for him) nowadays

.

At present one of the first pieces of advice that many a young man who's just starting in business receives . . . is never to be alone in a work situation with a female, unless they're in a place where they can be seen by others. Makes sense to me.

kibitzer wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Oh the Pence rule. The party under the complete control of Donald trump have members who refuse to be alone with females. Crazy stuff.

Could they be alone with a female if she was covered head to toe with no skin showing? Just asking.

I know of a religion that is very concerned about female temptations too. They found the covering of female skin to be useful. Maybe Pence should join.

Okay, I have to give the guy a break on this one.

.

It is increasingly common, in all kinds of business settings, for a male not to be alone one-on-one with a female--except in a public/visible place.

.

Years ago, a colleague had to give a female whom he was supervising some bad news: She hadn't been selected for a particular opportunity. He told her this in his office. She tore open her blouse and rushed out, claiming he'd molested her. It was a very nasty situation, and I can only imagine how much worse it would have been (for him) nowadays

.

At present one of the first pieces of advice that many a young man who's just starting in business receives . . . is never to be alone in a work situation with a female, unless they're in a place where they can be seen by others. Makes sense to me.

Intolerance wrote:

kibitzer wrote:

Okay, I have to give the guy a break on this one.

.

It is increasingly common, in all kinds of business settings, for a male not to be alone one-on-one with a female--except in a public/visible place.

.

Years ago, a colleague had to give a female whom he was supervising some bad news: She hadn't been selected for a particular opportunity. He told her this in his office. She tore open her blouse and rushed out, claiming he'd molested her. It was a very nasty situation, and I can only imagine how much worse it would have been (for him) nowadays

.

At present one of the first pieces of advice that many a young man who's just starting in business receives . . . is never to be alone in a work situation with a female, unless they're in a place where they can be seen by others. Makes sense to me.

Not too long ago a lot of folks down south were refusing to be in the presence of black people. Many of you may see a stark difference here, but think about it a bit harder... it reeks of non tolerance all the same. Why are these people trying to take us backwards?

douglas burke wrote:

Pete Buttiegieg (Unsure of spelling) seems smart and all, but it just seems so wrong to have him be a President, after they teach us in school that what he does is a sexual deviancy a perversion, and in many countries it is a major crime including in 9 countries a death penalty offense, and even in extremely liberal/far left countries like Tanzania he could get decades in jail, in the USA they tell us he is immoral and then what 5-10 years ago they say its all right, I could never vote for someone who I know is gay to be President, and I am not afraid to say it, but MANY who think like me wont say it, but they also will not get in the voting booth and vote for him, I am biased, Predjudiced, homophobe whatever, but they spent most of the country's history saying it was wrong, now they want to change everything, if it was okay the founders should have said it from the beginning.