I (not Harambe) started this thread with no political bent, if the facts “mock conservatives” then maybe conservatives should engage with the facts more…
I don’t think antivax and COVID denying is claimed solely by one side or the other. Far left and far right are both stupid on this topic.
To be fair, your original article shows that:
1) COVID posed a danger to young healthy people
2) the vaccine was thus justified for all groups for which it was approved
This phased-plasma-rifle-shot of evidence vaporized the meat of the “moderate” antivaxx argument (“I’m not antivaxx just covid wasn’t dangerous enough to give vaccines to everyone!”).
If you’re some who’s spent years tying their LRC (and seemingly real-word) identity to the “moderate” antivaxx argument…. Well, a post like yours probably feels mocking, embarrassing, humiliating.
You need to remember this. The rest of us will. It is your legacy.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
2) the vaccine was thus justified for all groups for which it was approved
This phased-plasma-rifle-shot of evidence vaporized the meat of the “moderate” antivaxx argument (“I’m not antivaxx just covid wasn’t dangerous enough to give vaccines to everyone!”).
If you’re some who’s spent years tying their LRC (and seemingly real-word) identity to the “moderate” antivaxx argument…. Well, a post like yours probably feels mocking, embarrassing, humiliating.
You need to remember this. The rest of us will. It is your legacy.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
Remember. As you spam the same 8th-grade writing level slop over and over, 400k Americans are dead because of propaganda you helped spread.
4 years later you refuse to face this fact. Surely it haunts a bit. Looking around at your loving family. Knowing it could have been them… and you would have helped push them into the grave.
Bro, 2800 bro, wtf? have you been reading the havana syndrome thread earlier? guys over there are on another level of knowledge than you and harambe. Cardiac deaths are not primarily caused by covid, vaccines, salt, sucrose, or pesticides. Do you know how hard it is to short circuit electricity to the heart? That's on the order of 10^3 volts on the classical scale. Only the superposition of 2 RF beamform main lobes could come anywhere close to threatening 10^3 volts and short circuiting the heart causing heart attack death. Electrocution is a more correct term. When you touch the hot wire you become the ground and get electricity going through your body. When 2 powerful RF beamform main lobes superpose onto your brain, your brain draws inordinately more electrons and free charges from beneath your feet (earth) to cope with the imbalance. It is this movement that causes zapping throughout your body and the heart is most affected by this. That's how you get a heart attack. No vaccines and no covid can do that, no amount of bad diet too except accompanied by at least 2 intersecting RF beamforms. This is electrical physics at its most hardcore and unfiltered explained to you.
Conclusion: you are wrong, RFK is wrong, congress is wrong, I used to be wrong, only Langley Virginia CIA and DARPA has always been quietly right. Only they know what's the real cause of heart attack. It is unnaturally induced
You need to remember this. The rest of us will. It is your legacy.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
Remember. As you spam the same 8th-grade writing level slop over and over, 400k Americans are dead because of propaganda you helped spread.
4 years later you refuse to face this fact. Surely it haunts a bit. Looking around at your loving family. Knowing it could have been them… and you would have helped push them into the grave.
You and 2600 bro need to get a life. Never seen such ignorant guys. You could never keep company the likes of Oliver Heaviside and Nikola Tesla if you keep in this vein and don't improve yourselves.
At the end of the day, I will log in and post for the next 10 years on this thread if need be. You guys will never get the last word. One day you will stop posting. My witty retort will be the last thing anyone sees, eviscerating your breathless evidence-free claims. And I will win.
Harambe has a tendency to declare ipso facto victory, based on his meanerings, regardless of whether it's achieved or not. He's an .
"Biden fixed Covid" - harambe Spring 2021 and doubled down on after. Yes, the Joe Biden we now know wasn't attending iimportant staff meetings from the first day of his presidency, due to his deteriorating mental state. I think Harambe also has a deteriorated mental state, or is he was born dumb, you decide.
At the end of the day, I will log in and post for the next 10 years on this thread if need be. You guys will never get the last word. One day you will stop posting. My witty retort will be the last thing anyone sees, eviscerating your breathless evidence-free claims. And I will win.
I have no doubt you will be here 10 years from now futilely defending your indefensible position. Your last retort may be the last thing anyone sees, but the thing everyone will remember is when a poster cut your balls off.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
Harambe doesn’t “jovially participate,” ever. He’s a megalomaniacal narcissist, like you, he starts threads to mock conservatives especially, and his incessant need to be correct and to so brashly proclaim he’s correct invites the trolling. He’s like the Establishment media. Same condescension that engenders distrust and disdain and not only undermined the public health response but elected the likes of Trump. So, congrats, I guess?
I (not Harambe) started this thread with no political bent, if the facts “mock conservatives” then maybe conservatives should engage with the facts more…
I don’t think antivax and COVID denying is claimed solely by one side or the other. Far left and far right are both stupid on this topic.
Neither side of the aisle solely claims skepticism of vaccinations, but historically the big disconnect between individual attitudes and the body of scientific vaccine data it has been mostly associated with the granola far left.
The libertarian right has been increasingly distrustful of science and expertise over the past few decades, most visibly manifest in the area of climate science, but became the majority body of vocal vaccine skepticism only during the covid era.
The body of facts shouldn't be political, but they are certainly politicized by both sides as they perceive to be advantageous.
One might hope that all sides could agree on a common body of facts as a basis for rational policy decisions, but people are better at rationalizing their preferred policy by emphasizing the subset of facts supporting that policy rather than letting the full body of evidence inform policy.
Kelce's decline dates back to the start of the 2023 season and Djokovic's decline dates back to the start of the 2024 season. Despite these declines, they both had great performances in the biggest moments since their decline. Somehow in your warped timeline, that means there is definitely nothing wrong with Djokovic and definitely something wrong with Kelce.
These past two seasons have been abysmal for Kelce. I think it’s more than fair to point out that if you’re going to make ridiculous assertions about one player then it’s fair game across the board. Frankly, Novak has also been far more successful over the last year than Kelce has unquestionably.
But you must have consistency in calling out stupidity though. If it’s stupid to say Kelce is in decline because of the vaccine then you should also take the stand that harambe is a moron for making his ridiculous assertions regarding Novak. Bringinitback and yourself seem to be defending his right to stupidity while complaining about people out who are doing the literal EXACT same thing with Kelce. So either call a spade a spade across the board or let the morons yell. Easy choice.
... All undiagnosed heart killers that are unfortunately NOT rare. My sons' high school offers free heart screenings twice per year, in honor of a boy who died of heart failure. Every time they find a teen with a messed up heart!
I read these threads because every 20 posts or so I learn something and once in a while it's a real nugget of wisdom. Free heart screenings made available 2x/year for high schoolers is a great idea! Is it being done at other high schools? If not, it should be encouraged.
Covid vax proponent young champion athletes like Betts (32) and Kelce (35) get very sick (as described by Dodgers manager and Chiefs GM), but unvaxxed me (64) goes the last 5 years with only 2 days of mild illness from an Omicron infection.
I (not Harambe) started this thread with no political bent, if the facts “mock conservatives” then maybe conservatives should engage with the facts more…
I don’t think antivax and COVID denying is claimed solely by one side or the other. Far left and far right are both stupid on this topic.
Neither side of the aisle solely claims skepticism of vaccinations, but historically the big disconnect between individual attitudes and the body of scientific vaccine data it has been mostly associated with the granola far left.
The libertarian right has been increasingly distrustful of science and expertise over the past few decades, most visibly manifest in the area of climate science, but became the majority body of vocal vaccine skepticism only during the covid era.
The body of facts shouldn't be political, but they are certainly politicized by both sides as they perceive to be advantageous.
One might hope that all sides could agree on a common body of facts as a basis for rational policy decisions, but people are better at rationalizing their preferred policy by emphasizing the subset of facts supporting that policy rather than letting the full body of evidence inform policy.
Had we never had scientists immediately denouncing the lab leak hypothesis as “conspiracy theory,” immediately denigrating and undermining anyone associated with the Great Barrington Declaration, destroying evidence and not complying with investigative requests, recommending Remdesivir AFTER the initial 7-8 day viral infection had run its course (Remdesivir destroys the kidneys and causes pulmonary edema, shocking), and stonewalling the former head of the CDC who not only was the biggest, early proponent of the lab leak but also the only infectious disease clinician and one who refuses to give the mRNA vaccine to his patients because of the sheer volume of post vax syndrome he’s witnessed, partisanship would’ve been relegated to the back burner.
”Scientists” on here were fomenting hatred and disgust and openly mocking conservatives, even, incorrectly per usual, predicting Trump would lose because Covid was only killing off unvaccinated redhats in swing states. Harambe chief among them.
Sorry, Monkeys, I believe you to be more genuine and interested in the truth than the rest, but when it comes to taking a novel fragment of mRNA packaged in a lipid nanoparticle that can literally deliver the payload anywhere in the body and containing a higher than FDA approved level of DNA contaminant (which we now know can integrate into the genome, mechanism unknown because it sure as heck isn’t integrase or reverse transcriptase), not to mention recipients have been shown in CELL by a Stanford study to still be producing spike protein some 60 days after “vaccination,” you have to welcome skepticism and dissent. You can not undermine individual medical autonomy and then proceed to ostracize skeptics and refusers, particularly those in very low risk profiles. But that’s exactly what happened. That’s exactly what your peers did here. And are still doing.
The tennis is merely a sideshow and another endless opportunity for Harambe to traffic in his usual narcissism, even if he’s wrong, which he is. But he’s wrong for the “right” reasons you see.
Covid vax proponent young champion athletes like Betts (32) and Kelce (35) get very sick (as described by Dodgers manager and Chiefs GM), but unvaxxed me (64) goes the last 5 years with only 2 days of mild illness from an Omicron infection.
Can anybody explain this ?
Sure. People are different. They have different immune systems and encounter different numbers and kinds of other people.
Neither side of the aisle solely claims skepticism of vaccinations, but historically the big disconnect between individual attitudes and the body of scientific vaccine data it has been mostly associated with the granola far left.
The libertarian right has been increasingly distrustful of science and expertise over the past few decades, most visibly manifest in the area of climate science, but became the majority body of vocal vaccine skepticism only during the covid era.
The body of facts shouldn't be political, but they are certainly politicized by both sides as they perceive to be advantageous.
One might hope that all sides could agree on a common body of facts as a basis for rational policy decisions, but people are better at rationalizing their preferred policy by emphasizing the subset of facts supporting that policy rather than letting the full body of evidence inform policy.
Had we never had scientists immediately denouncing the lab leak hypothesis as “conspiracy theory,” immediately denigrating and undermining anyone associated with the Great Barrington Declaration, destroying evidence and not complying with investigative requests, recommending Remdesivir AFTER the initial 7-8 day viral infection had run its course (Remdesivir destroys the kidneys and causes pulmonary edema, shocking), and stonewalling the former head of the CDC who not only was the biggest, early proponent of the lab leak but also the only infectious disease clinician and one who refuses to give the mRNA vaccine to his patients because of the sheer volume of post vax syndrome he’s witnessed, partisanship would’ve been relegated to the back burner.
”Scientists” on here were fomenting hatred and disgust and openly mocking conservatives, even, incorrectly per usual, predicting Trump would lose because Covid was only killing off unvaccinated redhats in swing states. Harambe chief among them.
Sorry, Monkeys, I believe you to be more genuine and interested in the truth than the rest, but when it comes to taking a novel fragment of mRNA packaged in a lipid nanoparticle that can literally deliver the payload anywhere in the body and containing a higher than FDA approved level of DNA contaminant (which we now know can integrate into the genome, mechanism unknown because it sure as heck isn’t integrase or reverse transcriptase), not to mention recipients have been shown in CELL by a Stanford study to still be producing spike protein some 60 days after “vaccination,” you have to welcome skepticism and dissent. You can not undermine individual medical autonomy and then proceed to ostracize skeptics and refusers, particularly those in very low risk profiles. But that’s exactly what happened. That’s exactly what your peers did here. And are still doing.
The tennis is merely a sideshow and another endless opportunity for Harambe to traffic in his usual narcissism, even if he’s wrong, which he is. But he’s wrong for the “right” reasons you see.
The tennis was always the weirdest hill to die on.
Neither side of the aisle solely claims skepticism of vaccinations, but historically the big disconnect between individual attitudes and the body of scientific vaccine data it has been mostly associated with the granola far left.
The libertarian right has been increasingly distrustful of science and expertise over the past few decades, most visibly manifest in the area of climate science, but became the majority body of vocal vaccine skepticism only during the covid era.
The body of facts shouldn't be political, but they are certainly politicized by both sides as they perceive to be advantageous.
One might hope that all sides could agree on a common body of facts as a basis for rational policy decisions, but people are better at rationalizing their preferred policy by emphasizing the subset of facts supporting that policy rather than letting the full body of evidence inform policy.
Sorry, Monkeys, I believe you to be more genuine and interested in the truth than the rest, but when it comes to taking a novel fragment of mRNA packaged in a lipid nanoparticle that can literally deliver the payload anywhere in the body and containing a higher than FDA approved level of DNA contaminant (which we now know can integrate into the genome, mechanism unknown because it sure as heck isn’t integrase or reverse transcriptase), not to mention recipients have been shown in CELL by a Stanford study to still be producing spike protein some 60 days after “vaccination,” you have to welcome skepticism and dissent. You can not undermine individual medical autonomy and then proceed to ostracize skeptics and refusers, particularly those in very low risk profiles. But that’s exactly what happened. That’s exactly what your peers did here. And are still doing.
The tennis is merely a sideshow and another endless opportunity for Harambe to traffic in his usual narcissism, even if he’s wrong, which he is. But he’s wrong for the “right” reasons you see.
Drivel. There are more recombination events from LINE1 mediate RT of the VIRAL mRNA than from plasmid contamination.
Also acting like we don't know the method of dsDNA integration in the genome? Bro...
We ostracize skeptics who do not engage with the data and evidence! It's pretty easy to be taken seriously - Iwasaki's vaccine-injury work has been taken very seriously!
Sorry, Monkeys, I believe you to be more genuine and interested in the truth than the rest, but when it comes to taking a novel fragment of mRNA packaged in a lipid nanoparticle that can literally deliver the payload anywhere in the body and containing a higher than FDA approved level of DNA contaminant (which we now know can integrate into the genome, mechanism unknown because it sure as heck isn’t integrase or reverse transcriptase), not to mention recipients have been shown in CELL by a Stanford study to still be producing spike protein some 60 days after “vaccination,” you have to welcome skepticism and dissent. You can not undermine individual medical autonomy and then proceed to ostracize skeptics and refusers, particularly those in very low risk profiles. But that’s exactly what happened. That’s exactly what your peers did here. And are still doing.
The tennis is merely a sideshow and another endless opportunity for Harambe to traffic in his usual narcissism, even if he’s wrong, which he is. But he’s wrong for the “right” reasons you see.
Drivel. There are more recombination events from LINE1 mediate RT of the VIRAL mRNA than from plasmid contamination.
Also acting like we don't know the method of dsDNA integration in the genome? Bro...
We ostracize skeptics who do not engage with the data and evidence! It's pretty easy to be taken seriously - Iwasaki's vaccine-injury work has been taken very seriously!
What is the exact mechanism of THIS plasmid DNA integration and has it been proven? Non-homologous integration? Really? Has anyone shown this to be happening? Is anyone bothering to look?
Yep, Covid itself can be reverse transcribed. So? Is this novel for a virus? It’s been happening for eons. If this is the case, why do we keep giving vaccines supersensitizing to a specific antigen and “chasing variants,” which only makes recipients more vulnerable to Covid infection and potentiates more such events? So more DNA integration and more viral recombination events? Brilliant.
You don’t have “all the data,” because nobody is looking for all the data. And you cannot find what you are not looking for. Aka, why is natural immunity more effective than vaccine induced immunity and why are mostly recipients of multiple vaccination events the ones still getting infected? Because it’s actually happening.
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. You, through your very overt and vocal ridicule and scorn undermined the public health effort. Also, interesting you failed to respond to anything in my first paragraph, because it isn’t drivel. Massive effort to denounce lab leak hypothesis, denigrate and prematurely undermine all the scientists and doctors affiliated w the Great Barrington Declaration, delete emails and engage in a cover up, alienate Redfield, and only allow the Remdesivir/vent protocol some two-three weeks into a Covid event. Sorry dude, these are your peers you are defending. You know how many people the Remdesivir/vent protocol killed before vaccines were available?
Neither side of the aisle solely claims skepticism of vaccinations, but historically the big disconnect between individual attitudes and the body of scientific vaccine data it has been mostly associated with the granola far left.
The libertarian right has been increasingly distrustful of science and expertise over the past few decades, most visibly manifest in the area of climate science, but became the majority body of vocal vaccine skepticism only during the covid era.
The body of facts shouldn't be political, but they are certainly politicized by both sides as they perceive to be advantageous.
One might hope that all sides could agree on a common body of facts as a basis for rational policy decisions, but people are better at rationalizing their preferred policy by emphasizing the subset of facts supporting that policy rather than letting the full body of evidence inform policy.
Had we never had scientists immediately denouncing the lab leak hypothesis as “conspiracy theory,” immediately denigrating and undermining anyone associated with the Great Barrington Declaration, destroying evidence and not complying with investigative requests, recommending Remdesivir AFTER the initial 7-8 day viral infection had run its course (Remdesivir destroys the kidneys and causes pulmonary edema, shocking), and stonewalling the former head of the CDC who not only was the biggest, early proponent of the lab leak but also the only infectious disease clinician and one who refuses to give the mRNA vaccine to his patients because of the sheer volume of post vax syndrome he’s witnessed, partisanship would’ve been relegated to the back burner.
”Scientists” on here were fomenting hatred and disgust and openly mocking conservatives, even, incorrectly per usual, predicting Trump would lose because Covid was only killing off unvaccinated redhats in swing states. Harambe chief among them.
Sorry, Monkeys, I believe you to be more genuine and interested in the truth than the rest, but when it comes to taking a novel fragment of mRNA packaged in a lipid nanoparticle that can literally deliver the payload anywhere in the body and containing a higher than FDA approved level of DNA contaminant (which we now know can integrate into the genome, mechanism unknown because it sure as heck isn’t integrase or reverse transcriptase), not to mention recipients have been shown in CELL by a Stanford study to still be producing spike protein some 60 days after “vaccination,” you have to welcome skepticism and dissent. You can not undermine individual medical autonomy and then proceed to ostracize skeptics and refusers, particularly those in very low risk profiles. But that’s exactly what happened. That’s exactly what your peers did here. And are still doing.
The tennis is merely a sideshow and another endless opportunity for Harambe to traffic in his usual narcissism, even if he’s wrong, which he is. But he’s wrong for the “right” reasons you see.
Anyway, Monkeys, I’m talking specifically to you. There’s a reason the partisanship escalated, and the Establishment media, which has been caught censoring, editing, and buckling to the previous administration’s pressure, amplified this exponentially. Any and all dissent was immediately met with contempt and scorn and blacklisting. There’s no reason to Monday morning QB this anymore, even though some of us were trying to hit the pause button in the actual moment.
I have no doubt Harambe is determined to get “the last word,” because that’s his goal in life. Even though I stole his *registered* handle and deployed it and ended the “Official Covid Vaccine” thread, which is hilarious because he tells all of us he’s the smartest guy in the room. Why won’t you listen? Good riddance.
At the end of the day, I will log in and post for the next 10 years on this thread if need be. You guys will never get the last word. One day you will stop posting. My witty retort will be the last thing anyone sees, eviscerating your breathless evidence-free claims. And I will win.
Harambe has a tendency to declare ipso facto victory, based on his meanerings, regardless of whether it's achieved or not. He's an .
"Biden fixed Covid" - harambe Spring 2021 and doubled down on after. Yes, the Joe Biden we now know wasn't attending iimportant staff meetings from the first day of his presidency, due to his deteriorating mental state. I think Harambe also has a deteriorated mental state, or is he was born dumb, you decide.
Nobody up to date in the evidence was severely worried about Covid after the vaccines. Biden was responsible for distributing the vaccines. I’m happy to give Trump some credit too, but the risk of COVID fell the largest during Biden’s term.
If you feel like presidents should not get credit for the state of the country during their term, then ok. That’s not really the status quo.
Drivel. There are more recombination events from LINE1 mediate RT of the VIRAL mRNA than from plasmid contamination.
Also acting like we don't know the method of dsDNA integration in the genome? Bro...
We ostracize skeptics who do not engage with the data and evidence! It's pretty easy to be taken seriously - Iwasaki's vaccine-injury work has been taken very seriously!
What is the exact mechanism of THIS plasmid DNA integration and has it been proven? Non-homologous integration? Really? Has anyone shown this to be happening? Is anyone bothering to look?
Yep, Covid itself can be reverse transcribed. So? Is this novel for a virus? It’s been happening for eons. If this is the case, why do we keep giving vaccines supersensitizing to a specific antigen and “chasing variants,” which only makes recipients more vulnerable to Covid infection and potentiates more such events? So more DNA integration and more viral recombination events? Brilliant.
You don’t have “all the data,” because nobody is looking for all the data. And you cannot find what you are not looking for. Aka, why is natural immunity more effective than vaccine induced immunity and why are mostly recipients of multiple vaccination events the ones still getting infected? Because it’s actually happening.
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. You, through your very overt and vocal ridicule and scorn undermined the public health effort. Also, interesting you failed to respond to anything in my first paragraph, because it isn’t drivel. Massive effort to denounce lab leak hypothesis, denigrate and prematurely undermine all the scientists and doctors affiliated w the Great Barrington Declaration, delete emails and engage in a cover up, alienate Redfield, and only allow the Remdesivir/vent protocol some two-three weeks into a Covid event. Sorry dude, these are your peers you are defending. You know how many people the Remdesivir/vent protocol killed before vaccines were available?
Can you show evidence for any of your theories. Biologically plausible hypotheses are a dime a dozen. There’s evidence of viral integration for many RNA viruses. There’s no evidence that vaccination makes you more susceptible to future variants. No evidence that only multiple vaccine recipients are the “only ones getting infected”
This is getting so boring. You have new claims (recycled from the past 3 years) weekly and when someone asks for evidence you change your claim. Notice you pivoted to lab leak by the end of your post.
At the end of the day, I will log in and post for the next 10 years on this thread if need be. You guys will never get the last word. One day you will stop posting. My witty retort will be the last thing anyone sees, eviscerating your breathless evidence-free claims. And I will win.
I have no doubt you will be here 10 years from now futilely defending your indefensible position. Your last retort may be the last thing anyone sees, but the thing everyone will remember is when a poster cut your balls off.
For those playing at home, contrary to what Harambe said, Novak did not have a slide in late 2023. He won the ATP Masters in mid-November and then focused on his big Olympic year in 2024. It is true that he got a flu during the Australian Open in January 2024 and bowed out in the semifinal to a convicted doper in Jannik Sinner. Harambe immediately pounced and proudly proclaimed Djokovic had “long Covid” right after that happened.
Djokovic, ever focused on Olympic gold, the crowning achievement for his career, pulled out of the Paris Open. He did, however, make the Wimbledon final and win the Olympic gold medal. Neither one of those things would’ve been possible if a person was truly suffering long Covid. It’s as if we are sitting here pretending Djokovic made every grand slam final he ever played in and, even more ridiculously, won them all. When none of that ever happened.
I previously proclaimed that Djokovic would retire by 38 at the latest. Pro tennis players are usually done at 35. If Djokovic retires this year or next, am I going to come on here and proudly proclaim what a genius I am? Of course not. I don’t know why liberals on here like Harambe carry on with the schadenfreude. It, along with a partisan and ethically bankrupt media, undermined public health and trust in the three-letter agencies. It also lost them an election. But they continue to double down. Boggles the mind.
If you insist on continuing to litigate the tennis stuff. I will remind you that Chokervic is currently in his worst stretch of form ever. And I predicted it before it started. Game. Set. Match.
