Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Moe Nikes wrote:

Nope. Trump is striving for NK to be recognized AS A nuclear power.

Wrong. South Korea says otherwise.

You don't seem to know that South Korea and North Korea are NOT the same country. Do you have any ability to understand the following?

South Korea president Moon Jae-in says North Korea should demonstrate its willingness to completely denuclearize through practical measures.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Rigged, etc....

Are you ok with accepting NK as a Nuclear Power? That is the word coming from the WH.

If so, if you conservatives will accept these kinds of things just because someone claiming to be a conservative says it's ok then this country is lost. You have no values other than to screw the other side.

Alan

It’s a fantastic precedent... if you are a dictator. Sounds like we will just need to cut out the BS with Iran and officially recognize them as a nuclear power too.

Good Point wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

You libs freaking out about the DMZ meeting were the same ones who screeched that Trump was going to cause a war with N Korea. Trump is doing what no President has ever done, reach out and push forward to negotiate denuclearization with NK.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1TV0EBhttps://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/06/30/bernie_sanders_nothing_wrong_with_trump_meeting_with_enemies_but_he_doesnt_have_to_praise_them.html

OK, I see your point. Not only are you a moron but you are a lying moron.

I have never said anything about Trump causing a war with N Korea. Which makes you a liar.

And Trump has won exactly zilch from N Korea. Which makes you a moron.

Congratulations!

I said liberals, not you specifically. Your side collectively warned that Trump would cause a war with NK.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Good Point wrote:

OK, I see your point. Not only are you a moron but you are a lying moron.

I have never said anything about Trump causing a war with N Korea. Which makes you a liar.

And Trump has won exactly zilch from N Korea. Which makes you a moron.

Congratulations!

I said liberals, not you specifically. Your side collectively warned that Trump would cause a war with NK.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2018/06/trump-north-korea-kim-negotiations-dealhttps://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/03/10/maher_trashes_liberal_response_to_trump_north_korea_meeting_fck_you_it_just_might_work.html

Simmer down... to clarify, you (trumpers) are now for potentially recognizing NK as a nuclear state. At the very least you are for the POTUS getting cozy with Un in the spirit of trying something different - of course at the expense (and this is very expensive) of losing our credibility and concession power... in exchange for nada.

At the same time, you are for the endless demonization of Iran after trump completely tore apart the one peace mechanism that was working.

Makes total sense!

art of the deal fanatics wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

I said liberals, not you specifically. Your side collectively warned that Trump would cause a war with NK.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2018/06/trump-north-korea-kim-negotiations-dealhttps://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/03/10/maher_trashes_liberal_response_to_trump_north_korea_meeting_fck_you_it_just_might_work.html

Simmer down... to clarify, you (trumpers) are now for potentially recognizing NK as a nuclear state. At the very least you are for the POTUS getting cozy with Un in the spirit of trying something different - of course at the expense (and this is very expensive) of losing our credibility and concession power... in exchange for nada.

At the same time, you are for the endless demonization of Iran after trump completely tore apart the one peace mechanism that was working.

Makes total sense!

The hypocrisy being exercised by trumpers daily is just mind blowing. It’s literally whatever trump says goes. Almost every conservative “principle” has been trashed and no longer applicable. Now what is acceptable is what tickles trump’s ego, destroys relationships with allies, deepens partisanship and shreds the constitution. Trumpers are demented.

I agree. Mueller testifying is not a good idea for the Dems. They need this whole charade to be put as far in the past as possible. Bringing John Dean was incredibly odd. They're making themselves look like fools at this point. Move forward, already.

Imagine if Trump has Barr and his team release devastating Russia Hoax documentation the day prior or day of the scheduled testimony. This could be an awesome spectacle.

Giggs wrote:

Mueller testifying is not a good idea for the Dems.

Oh? Why is it the Republicans are the ones attacking Mueller BEFORE he even testifies? If it is such a good idea for Repubs they should be cheering him on. But they are not.

trumpers support nepotism

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/01/politics/ivanka-trump-donald-trump-jr/index.html

But But But wrote:

Giggs wrote:

Mueller testifying is not a good idea for the Dems.

Oh? Why is it the Republicans are the ones attacking Mueller BEFORE he even testifies? If it is such a good idea for Repubs they should be cheering him on. But they are not.

Oh? Attacking Mueller? How so? They're just putting it out there that he's going to get roasted for all the things he intentionally avoided investigating to save the intelligence community's wrongdoings.

"The report is my testimony." The guy's an establishment bltch. So we knew he'd cave. Bottom line is he said Trump campaign didn't conspire or coordinate with "Russia". Game over.

Giggs wrote:

But But But wrote:

Oh? Why is it the Republicans are the ones attacking Mueller BEFORE he even testifies? If it is such a good idea for Repubs they should be cheering him on. But they are not.

Oh? Attacking Mueller? How so? They're just putting it out there that he's going to get roasted for all the things he intentionally avoided investigating to save the intelligence community's wrongdoings.

"The report is my testimony." The guy's an establishment bltch. So we knew he'd cave. Bottom line is he said Trump campaign didn't conspire or coordinate with "Russia". Game over.

You are IGNORANT.

Trump claimed Mueller "exonerated" him. No "collusion"! How could you forget that?

But But But wrote:

Giggs wrote:

Oh? Attacking Mueller? How so? They're just putting it out there that he's going to get roasted for all the things he intentionally avoided investigating to save the intelligence community's wrongdoings.

"The report is my testimony." The guy's an establishment bltch. So we knew he'd cave. Bottom line is he said Trump campaign didn't conspire or coordinate with "Russia". Game over.

You are IGNORANT.

Trump claimed Mueller "exonerated" him. No "collusion"! How could you forget that?

What are you talking about?

What does that Trump statement have to do with anything I posted? I said Mueller isn't being attacked.

What do you think Mueller's answer will be when he's asked "When did you know there was no conspiracy or coordination between Trump and Russia? This is 100% going to be asked.

Giggs wrote:

I don't know what I am talking about.

You are IGNORANT.

Republicans should be wary of overreaching in their questioning of Mueller, Capitol Hill and Justice Department veterans say.

Sam Sokol, a former top House Judiciary Committee Democratic counsel, said Republicans are asking for trouble if they travel down rabbit holes in their questioning. “I think the claims of bias or flawed procedures or misuse of the FISA court that have been made, as far as I’ve seen, don’t have a credible foundation and I think Mueller will be able to expose how small and political those charges are, especially when put up against the gravity of the attack on our election and foreign interference on our democracy that his report documents,” Sokol said.

Michael Zeldin, who served as Mueller’s special counsel when he was assistant attorney general of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, said Mueller “has to prepare for a Republican onslaught, which could backfire if Mueller is on his game. But I can’t imagine the GOP questioning will make him nervous, because there’s there nothing to expose,” said Zeldin, who added that he’s never seen Mueller get nervous.

Other longtime observers of presidential scandal also see Republicans costing Trump politically if they push Mueller in ways that don’t make sense to that small sliver of independent, swing-vote Americans who haven’t yet made up their mind about the significance of the Russia investigation by the time the hearing rolls around later this month.

LOL- What is your link supposed to show? It's an article saying "if Mueller is on his game..." Wow. Good one, you really showed me! LOL

Yeah, Republicans are getting ready to ask Mueller some questions that will expose his bias to protect the intel community. Like, maybe ask "Why didn't the FBI inform the Trump campaign that they were spying?", or "So when did you know there was no collusion?", or "Besides the dossier, what evidence was used during the FISA approvals?"

I'll ask again- how have they ATTACKED Mueller to this point? You have yet to answer the question. Do you know what "attack" means?

Biden is a poor candidate. Note that this was an appearance before fund-raisers and bundler, not before actual voters. Usually this is the most friendly audience a candidate can possibly face. He told the story pretty much guaranteed to piss off the people actually in attendance. Poor preparation by his staff or extremely poor judgement by the candidate. He appears way out of touch with reality. Note that he told this story in 2014 as well, but at that point he pushed back the time to 1999 when it was OK to be homophobic. Making himself seem calculated and insincere as well as out of touch. What an absolute moran. This is not the guy any thinking democrat wants on the ballot.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/30/politics/joe-biden-pushback-gay-rights-waiter-comment-seattle/index.html

Giggs wrote:

But But But wrote:

Other longtime observers of presidential scandal also see Republicans costing Trump politically if they push Mueller in ways that don’t make sense to that small sliver of independent, swing-vote Americans who haven’t yet made up their mind about the significance of the Russia investigation by the time the hearing rolls around later this month.

LOL- What is your link supposed to show?

You should really work on your comprehension skills. They are bigly weak.

He obviously is deeply scarred after being duped by the Demonrats and establishment intel community, and has no real answers for you. He just yells and name-calls, then links to an article (from Politico no less!).

Very common tactic by those on the Left around these parts.

Biden must go wrote:

Biden is a poor candidate.

Trump is a much worse candidate.

Biden will destroy Trump in BOTH the popular vote (> 5 million), and the EC vote (> 100).

Harris will destroy Trump by bigger margins than Biden.

Bernie will destroy Trump.

Warren will destroy Trump.

The list goes on.

I love making up posts like the above to support myself. It's like giving myself a BJ, :-)

Trump must go wrote:

Biden must go wrote:

Biden is a poor candidate.

Trump is a much worse candidate.

Biden will destroy Trump in BOTH the popular vote (> 5 million), and the EC vote (> 100).

Harris will destroy Trump by bigger margins than Biden.

Bernie will destroy Trump.

Warren will destroy Trump.

The list goes on.

Hillary was going to annihilate Trump. Did she?