Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Viva la vida locas wrote:

Do you not know that to pluralize a surname, you simply add an "s." You do not add an apostrophe and an "s" yet you did that three times.

You should have written:

...you simply add an "s".

Also, you forgot a lowly comma--

... and an "s", yet you ...

Trollminator wrote:

Harris / Castro 2020 wrote:

It’ll be Harris / Castro in 2020. The EC will be close but the popular vote won’t be.

I'm thinking Harris/Pete based on last two nights only. Castro did well but he's not generally good on the stage and comes off as less genuine.

Ever heard of Mike Pence?

Trollminator wrote:

agip wrote:

It's down to three, methinks:

harris, warren, biden.

Harris will have momentum now and will get tons of press coverage. Will be key to see if she can stay on the move or either make mistakes or just fail to capitalize.

She'd be good against trump - tough one, she is. But I wish she weren't so liberal and eager to throw over the apple cart. I don't think she understands the innate conservatism of this country and that we are tired of a bunch of broken eggs. We want some calm.

or at least the majority of the dem party does.

She will move to center quickly, trust me.

Just as Trump "found" religion during his run for president.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Why don't you dems talk about taking care of our citizens & Veterans who are homeless instead of illegal aliens first?

Dems should also talk about covering mental illness, like Rigged obviously suffers from, and providing them with a paid for padded room.

found religion wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

She will move to center quickly, trust me.

Just as Trump "found" religion during his run for president.

What Trump found were groups of voters who would happily give him a lot of money if he pretended to praise the Lord. That is why he chose Pence, and why he is best pals with salesmen of religion like Falwell.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

as unbelievable as you might think it is, Americans generally want to lessen the suffering of human beings in their nation.

stunning and non-Republican idea, I know. You may need a day or two to get your hands around it. Take your time.

anyway, hospitals serve everyone who walks in the door. they don't turn away anyone who needs help. In general, within reason. so the Dems are just saying what is already happening.

Why don't you dems talk about taking care of our citizens & Veterans who are homeless instead of illegal aliens first?

Rigged, for pete's sake it's the Rs who are actively trying to take away health care.

After the last 10 years of this how can you not understand this? It's bewildering. The Rs are actively trying to take away health care from Americans. Trump is furious at McCain for not taking away all that health care.

The Ds are trying to get more health care for Americans. Why is this not clear by now?

Trollminator wrote:

agip wrote:

It's down to three, methinks:

harris, warren, biden.

Harris will have momentum now and will get tons of press coverage. Will be key to see if she can stay on the move or either make mistakes or just fail to capitalize.

She'd be good against trump - tough one, she is. But I wish she weren't so liberal and eager to throw over the apple cart. I don't think she understands the innate conservatism of this country and that we are tired of a bunch of broken eggs. We want some calm.

or at least the majority of the dem party does.

She will move to center quickly, trust me.

She'll ry to. However, gone are the days where one could campaign in the primary on the fringe and then move to the center. With the ever present coverage, people's words (and hands) betray them once the general election start.

It's easy to see how the major media outlets try to shape the narrative. It's clear that they want a closer race for the nomination. More views and more clicks if it is close rather than a Biden runaway.

It was funny watching the talking heads this morning say how bad Biden was last night and then trying to elevate others. Now the low info voters come on and parrot what they say. The informed voters who actually watched the debate know this wasn't the case. Just goes to show you how the media can manipulate the thoughts of a large segment of our population.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Why don't you dems talk about taking care of our citizens & Veterans who are homeless instead of illegal aliens first?

Rigged, for pete's sake it's the Rs who are actively trying to take away health care.

After the last 10 years of this how can you not understand this? It's bewildering. The Rs are actively trying to take away health care from Americans. Trump is furious at McCain for not taking away all that health care.

The Ds are trying to get more health care for Americans. Why is this not clear by now?

this is exactly why the Ds have to go with moderates. Tens of millions of Rs legit think that the Ds aren't trying to get them healthcare. The R voters just can't bother with a party that focuses so much on identity politics and transgender and abortion and hating the rich with a passion. The trump people need what the Ds are trying to get for them. Education, health care, etc. Even Rs like the D platform better on services.

Most Rs simply do not believe the truth: the R party is trying to take their money and services and give it to the rich.

But the Trump voters can't even start to get on board because of the liberal crazy embedded in the D party.

Go to the center, Ds. abandon the crazy. Get millions more votes.

Good Show wrote:

It's easy to see how the major media outlets try to shape the narrative. It's clear that they want a closer race for the nomination. More views and more clicks if it is close rather than a Biden runaway.

It was funny watching the talking heads this morning say how bad Biden was last night and then trying to elevate others. Now the low info voters come on and parrot what they say. The informed voters who actually watched the debate know this wasn't the case. Just goes to show you how the media can manipulate the thoughts of a large segment of our population.

conspiracy minded claptrap.

agip wrote:

Good Show wrote:

It's easy to see how the major media outlets try to shape the narrative. It's clear that they want a closer race for the nomination. More views and more clicks if it is close rather than a Biden runaway.

It was funny watching the talking heads this morning say how bad Biden was last night and then trying to elevate others. Now the low info voters come on and parrot what they say. The informed voters who actually watched the debate know this wasn't the case. Just goes to show you how the media can manipulate the thoughts of a large segment of our population.

conspiracy minded claptrap.

sorry, apologies, my response was too harsh. I apologize. I'm hangry typing.

Anyway, no. The press does not tell its commentators and pundits to help certain candidates in order to make the race closer. No. That is not done at real news orgs.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Why don't you dems talk about taking care of our citizens & Veterans who are homeless instead of illegal aliens first?

Rigged, for pete's sake it's the Rs who are actively trying to take away health care.

After the last 10 years of this how can you not understand this? It's bewildering. The Rs are actively trying to take away health care from Americans. Trump is furious at McCain for not taking away all that health care.

The Ds are trying to get more health care for Americans. Why is this not clear by now?

That's a laugh. If Barrycare is so good, then why are your candidates crying about healthcare so much? You certainly have PMSNBC/CNN's talking points memorized. You will not win the White House by putting illegal aliens ahead of our citizens.

agip wrote:

agip wrote:

conspiracy minded claptrap.

sorry, apologies, my response was too harsh. I apologize. I'm hangry typing.

Anyway, no. The press does not tell its commentators and pundits to help certain candidates in order to make the race closer. No. That is not done at real news orgs.

Well, I am NOT hangry, so I will type the truth right now:

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Good. Looks like I haven’t missed anything since the last time I checked in.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

Rigged, for pete's sake it's the Rs who are actively trying to take away health care.

After the last 10 years of this how can you not understand this? It's bewildering. The Rs are actively trying to take away health care from Americans. Trump is furious at McCain for not taking away all that health care.

The Ds are trying to get more health care for Americans. Why is this not clear by now?

You will not win the White House by putting illegal aliens ahead of our citizens.

that's true. So no one is doing that. Dems are trying for more health care, not less. Not a complicated concept. Health care for everyone.

Flagpole wrote:

agip wrote:

Biden/Harris

or

Harris/Biden

unbeatable.

Biden likely will not accept a VP role. If Harris is the top of the ticket, I hope she would pick Beto as VP. An all-woman ticket isn't likely and perhaps not a good idea. Harris/Castro would be interesting too.

Beto? You must not seen any of the debate nor him on the stump in person.

The guy makes Trump look like a genius.

agip wrote:

agip wrote:

conspiracy minded claptrap.

sorry, apologies, my response was too harsh. I apologize. I'm hangry typing.

Anyway, no. The press does not tell its commentators and pundits to help certain candidates in order to make the race closer. No. That is not done at real news orgs.

In today’s 24 hour news cycle:

Ratings > Objectivity

I agree with the OP that there is a definite push now to bring Biden closer to the other candidates. It’s not a conspiracy, but good business.

Beto, adios wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Biden likely will not accept a VP role. If Harris is the top of the ticket, I hope she would pick Beto as VP. An all-woman ticket isn't likely and perhaps not a good idea. Harris/Castro would be interesting too.

Beto? You must not seen any of the debate nor him on the stump in person.

The guy makes Trump look like a genius.

True. I’ve seen enough of BOR to know he’s not even fit to be dog catcher.

Ed Murrow wrote:

agip wrote:

sorry, apologies, my response was too harsh. I apologize. I'm hangry typing.

Anyway, no. The press does not tell its commentators and pundits to help certain candidates in order to make the race closer. No. That is not done at real news orgs.

In today’s 24 hour news cycle:

Ratings > Objectivity

I agree with the OP that there is a definite push now to bring Biden closer to the other candidates. It’s not a conspiracy, but good business.

you are saying that business managers talk to news and opinion people and say 'hey, we need a horserace to help the ratings - let's just say Harris had a great debate, ok?'