Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Runningart2004 wrote:

Biden should be the nominee. He's the most centralist major candidate (sorry Klobuchar).

Only if you want to lose.

Biden still thinks that if he wins Repulicans will be overcome by bipartisanship. Pretty convinced he is having dementia.

agip wrote:

I'm not so worried about the activist Ds...at this point they will crawl over broken glass to vote Trump out. So it's not going to matter a whole lot to them.

That's what you thought about Hillary, too.

Because I read tea leaves. The dynamics that made Trump electable in 2016 are not in play in 2020. He has not expanded his base. He had not courted the middle. He assumes he can still win with 46%. He assumes he can still win by pulling the same demographics. He can't. The population dynamic math is not on his side. It's getting worse for all Republicans and Trump isn't helping.

Republicans need to figure out the minority issue. Either find ways to keep them away from the polls (voter id laws) or court these voters (some Hispanics really like the wall idea).

Alan

My God man...please stay on the sidelines. I can't stomach such ignorance.

1) The Obstruction of Justice charges are serious and legitimate.

2) No one is "hell-bent" on erasing an election. We have discovered criminal behavior from him since then, and no one is above the law including the President. Your argument is sh!t. So, no President should ever be impeached or removed from office just because they won the last election? Would that always be "erasing" an election? An election victory does not give the President the right to do as he pleases.

3) Regarding the hush payment comment, are you TRYING to look like an ignoramus? I really don't get your motivation here. Michael Cohen is serving time in a federal prison for committing FELONY CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW VIOLATIONS at the direction of Trump. Trump is "Individual-1". He will go to prison over this unless he is pardoned or there is more crime that prevents it or he dies first or space aliens prevent it.

4) Manafort didn't cooperate.

5) Deutsche Bank is still a big problem for Trump. What are you even talking about?

6) Again, you should ask questions. Your statements are all wrong and just flat crap.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Sally Vix wrote:

deluded sally wrote:

Your Trumpian bubble world is very tiny.

It is shrinking...getting smaller, and smaller, and smaller.

Please seek professional help to escape the mental trap you locked yourself in to.

Until then...leave.

I don't even like Trump.

BS.

Flagpole wrote:

7) You have shown yet again that you do not understand anything and that you should be asking questions here ONLY and should never give an opinion.

hmmmm......

Mr. zero per cent...

Runningart2004 wrote:

I think the Far Right Conservative Base outnumbers the Far Left Conservative Base.

What is the Far Left "Conservative" Base?

Maybe you meant the Far Right Base outnumbers the Far Left Base.

If that's it, it's because the Far Right is the majority of the Republican base and the Democrat Base is more diverse in ideology.

The whole of the Democrat Base is bigger than the Republican Base.

It's how they are geographically concentrated that affects elections.

Anyway, I'd rather have Warren over Biden.

If Trump really has the 0% chance of winning you mention, might as well get someone that will do more for everyone.

There are a lot of swing voters that may like Biden over Warren but would actually gain more from a Warren presidency.

People in OH and PA would gain from the healthcare and education advancements she would push for.

L L wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

I think the Far Right Conservative Base outnumbers the Far Left Conservative Base.

What is the Far Left "Conservative" Base?

Maybe you meant the Far Right Base outnumbers the Far Left Base.

If that's it, it's because the Far Right is the majority of the Republican base and the Democrat Base is more diverse in ideology.

The whole of the Democrat Base is bigger than the Republican Base.

It's how they are geographically concentrated that affects elections.

Anyway, I'd rather have Warren over Biden.

If Trump really has the 0% chance of winning you mention, might as well get someone that will do more for everyone.

There are a lot of swing voters that may like Biden over Warren but would actually gain more from a Warren presidency.

People in OH and PA would gain from the healthcare and education advancements she would push for.

only a rarified few vote based on policy.

I mean look at the havoc trump is forcing on the farmers - they are losing billions, but they stay with him because white and he fights.

Flagpole wrote:

6) Again, you should ask questions. Your statements are all wrong and just flat crap.

hmmm...

spotter of irony wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

7) You have shown yet again that you do not understand anything and that you should be asking questions here ONLY and should never give an opinion.

hmmmm......

Mr. zero per cent...

Nope...Mr. Correct about the 2016 election because Trump cheated, and I accounted for that.

Sally, the time has come. I am banning you. I could only take your stupid and ignorant posts for so long, and today's the day I've had enough. You are a child who needs to leave the room where the adults are and go play with toys. Unlike when you have banned me (many times), my banning of you is for real and forever...with one caveat:

The Caveat:

If you ever come to your senses and stop defending this horrible man and President and acknowledge that you were wrong in your opinions about him (and this has to be a statement that makes it clear and is VERY STRONG about how wrong you were; complete and utter repentance), then, and only then will I even consider responding to you again.

You keep spewing the same crap over and over, and it's all wrong. You have been told by countless numbers of us how wrong you are, and some of them who are usually so patient with ignorant people have started to call you names. I don't need that, and I get no joy out of telling you how much you don't know, so I'm cutting the line.

I wish for you enlightenment.

Flagpole wrote:

spotter of irony wrote:

hmmmm......

Mr. zero per cent...

Nope...Mr. Correct about the 2016 election because Trump cheated, and I accounted for that.

Your girl cheated too, when she got debate questions in advance.

Warren has surpassed Bernie in two polls this week. She is still undervalued in the markets and if I was a betting man that is where my money would go down.

betfair wrote:

Warren has surpassed Bernie in two polls this week. She is still undervalued in the markets and if I was a betting man that is where my money would go down.

OF COURSE the Dems will nominate the person most likely to lose to Trump.

more irony wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Nope...Mr. Correct about the 2016 election because Trump cheated, and I accounted for that.

Your girl cheated too, when she got debate questions in advance.

Whatever she did has nothing to do with Trump or my prediction. She's hardly "my girl" either. First of all, she's a grown-ass woman, not a girl. Second of all, I was never enthralled with her...she was just a better choice than Trump...very qualified she was, but also with some flaws that made her not 100% likable.

You are a deflector...whoever you are.

Democrats are really busy in June prancing around in their pride parades.

I'm not arguing Trump's policies are good. I'm pointing out that its not a big difference from what Hillary would have been. Moreover, I'm not talking about the rhetoric but the actual policies we have under Trump. If the rhetoric means a lot to you, go know yourself out in condemning Trump. But things like what he says to North Korea is not that big of deal to me.

There are some differences between Trump and Hillary but not that much. The tax cut for example may have been a bad thing but its not that big of deal. Very few corporations ever ever paid 35% of their income in taxes. and Hillary most definitely would have kept it that way. 20% was always more typical.

Above all Trump is primarily a showman. He knows how to find an audience, size them up, and tell them what they want to hear. That is what he did with his voting base. It is just a matter of time before it dawns on everyone that he is really conning his own supporters, not his political opponents. At the end of the day Trump is a billionaire New Yorker who was as much a corporate democrat as anything else. He never had any political convictions. We are seeing that. The only exception is on the issue of trade. That is the one issue Trump was very outspoken about going all the way back to the early 1980s. But as I pointed out, not a lot has changed even on that issue except the tariffs and those could go away any time too..

agip wrote:

betfair wrote:

Warren has surpassed Bernie in two polls this week. She is still undervalued in the markets and if I was a betting man that is where my money would go down.

OF COURSE the Dems will nominate the person most likely to lose to Trump.

You were a dumbass Hillary supporter and are backing Biden now...don't think you should be making predictions

Democrats are queers wrote:

Democrats are really busy in June prancing around in their pride parades.

1) Does it really bother you what uglies two consenting adults want to bump? I mean, really? If so, why? Such a weird thing to be bothered by.

2) As far as pride parades go, I'm not really on any bandwagon of "pride", especially when it is something you had nothing to do with...color of your skin, country you were born in, sexual orientation, etc., but anytime an oppressed group wants to hold a peaceful parade, fine with me.