Trumps MO has always been to “just say you are investigating and the Republicans and I will take it from there@.
Exhibit 3,793 below
Trump: "We have our director of national and international intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. She took a lot of heat because she went in at Pam's insistence and she looked at votes that want to be checked out from Georgia ... let's assume Russia had something to do with it. You can add China and about 5 other countries"
Trumps MO has always been to “just say you are investigating and the Republicans and I will take it from there@.
Exhibit 3,793 below
Trump: "We have our director of national and international intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. She took a lot of heat because she went in at Pam's insistence and she looked at votes that want to be checked out from Georgia ... let's assume Russia had something to do with it. You can add China and about 5 other countries"
The he finished his first term with the worst economy since the Great Depression.
Biden fixed it.
He’s fcking it up again.
The dude sucks at his job. No other way to spin it.
Seems like you have an accurate assessment Trump’s incompetency and corruption. Said another way, you have proved the most basic test of consciousness. Show that you are creative. List 5 good things about Trump here:
1) he’s old, so his time left to do damage is limited
2) he’s dumb, so his corruption is obvious
3) he crapped his pants on live television in the Oval Office, ending a debate I’ve had with friends on “do you think anyone has ever crapped their pants on live television in the Oval Office?”
4) he’s in significant cognitive decline, providing many examples for signs that Americans should monitor in their aging loved ones
5) he’s a disaster on the world stage, driving more Americans to sample international news sources and become more familiar with issues outside the US.
wait, newname thinks Epstein was honeypotting PUTIN???????
No, no, non, nyet. FFS man.
Putin was helping Epstein honeypot Americans and other westerners. That's what was happening.
certatainly trump has done a lot of putin's bidding - is that because Putin got kompromat on Trump and used it? Epstein wrote that trump was the worst person he'd ever met. Fits a pattern of seeing trump do terrible things. Maybe putin knows about those terrible things too and is leveraging them against this country.
This scumbag apartheid state apologist is pushing that Epstein is a Russia asset when there are mountains of evidence showing he worked for Israel/Mossad. Btw do you support Israel poising Lebanon or are you going to blame that on Russia too?
🇱🇧 Israeli aircraft sprayed chemical substances over areas along the Blue Line across southern Lebanon on February 1, which Lebanon’s Ministries of Agriculture and Environment confirmed included the herbicide glyphosate at concentrations 20 to 30 times higher than normal levels.… pic.twitter.com/2X4oALbypX
RFK Jr: "Dr. Pollan up at Harvard has cured schizophrenia using keto diets... here are studies right now that I saw two days ago where people lose their bipolar diagnosis by changing their diet."pic.twitter.com/YR2twhPnZY
Lol. I can imagine what can be and be unburdened by what has been.
So, where's the proof Trump raped a child? Cat got your tongue, Matlock?
Defamation was your claim.
Trump is a public figure. People are allowed to call him a child rapist if they think he is. It’s not defamation. Nobody has to prove anything. That’s how it works.
I can call him a child rapist until I’m blue in the face and unless he proves 100% to me that he is not, there’s nothing you, he, or anyone else can do about it.
So quit asking me for proof. I don’t need to prove anything to you.
The only person that’s required to prove anything is Trump, if he wants to stop being called a child rapist.
So you have no proof. Got it. Your argument is meaningless.
In reference to what in particular? Lawsuits dismissed on procedural grounds (lack of standing or mootness) without any court ruling on the merits? No criminal charges were ever filed, since emoluments violations are civil—not illegal.
Are you dense. Things are illegal whether there are charges. He violated the emoluments clause by accepting gifts and outside investments in his private business while in office.
It’s not debatable. Will he be charged, probably not.
That doesn’t make it less illegal. He’s still breaking the law. This isn’t hard.
No. I am highly intelligent. Are you? You seem to make false claims without evidence then name call and whine about not needing to prove anything. Typical liberal attitude.
On "gifts," you are incorrect. No court has ever ruled on the merits that he did so.
The Constitution provides no criminal penalties for emoluments violations—it's not a crime like bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201) or fraud; instead, it's a civil/constitutional prohibition enforceable via impeachment, lawsuits, or (theoretically) disgorgement of profits, with no fines or jail time specified. Further, no DOJ or prosecutor has charged Trump (or any president) with emoluments-related crimes, as it's not codified as criminal; theoretical ties to fraud (e.g., conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371) remain untested and speculative.
So, do you care to provide evidence for this claim as well, or do you want to reply in the same way? (You don't need proof, followed by name calling).
Dems can’t win legitimately. That is why they push no to voter ID, mail-in ballots, and illegal aliens. Its all for political power and there are plenty of lunatic soldiers willing (as you see on this thread) to push their bizarre agenda.
Correct. Rioting is their only chance. Also, "no one is illegal on stolen land." LMAO. These types of virtue-signaling correlates well to intelligence level.
Dems can’t win legitimately. That is why they push no to voter ID, mail-in ballots, and illegal aliens. Its all for political power and there are plenty of lunatic soldiers willing (as you see on this thread) to push their bizarre agenda.
You’re completely disconnected from reality.
If "reality" is the mindset of a deranged liberal, I'd like to be as far removed as possible.
Are you dense. Things are illegal whether there are charges. He violated the emoluments clause by accepting gifts and outside investments in his private business while in office.
It’s not debatable. Will he be charged, probably not.
That doesn’t make it less illegal. He’s still breaking the law. This isn’t hard.
No. I am highly intelligent. Are you? You seem to make false claims without evidence then name call and whine about not needing to prove anything. Typical liberal attitude.
On "gifts," you are incorrect. No court has ever ruled on the merits that he did so.
The Constitution provides no criminal penalties for emoluments violations—it's not a crime like bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201) or fraud; instead, it's a civil/constitutional prohibition enforceable via impeachment, lawsuits, or (theoretically) disgorgement of profits, with no fines or jail time specified. Further, no DOJ or prosecutor has charged Trump (or any president) with emoluments-related crimes, as it's not codified as criminal; theoretical ties to fraud (e.g., conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371) remain untested and speculative.
So, do you care to provide evidence for this claim as well, or do you want to reply in the same way? (You don't need proof, followed by name calling).
No. I am highly intelligent. Are you? You seem to make false claims without evidence then name call and whine about not needing to prove anything. Typical liberal attitude.
On "gifts," you are incorrect. No court has ever ruled on the merits that he did so.
The Constitution provides no criminal penalties for emoluments violations—it's not a crime like bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201) or fraud; instead, it's a civil/constitutional prohibition enforceable via impeachment, lawsuits, or (theoretically) disgorgement of profits, with no fines or jail time specified. Further, no DOJ or prosecutor has charged Trump (or any president) with emoluments-related crimes, as it's not codified as criminal; theoretical ties to fraud (e.g., conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371) remain untested and speculative.
So, do you care to provide evidence for this claim as well, or do you want to reply in the same way? (You don't need proof, followed by name calling).
You’re grasping at straws, clown.
It’s illegal.
Like most liberals, you resort to name calling and whining if you are incapable of articulating laws & facts. I rate your performance on LR, as a greenhorn, a 1.3 out of 10. Good luck.
So you take Epstein's word? This is your proof? LMAO. Interesting choice of people of whose opinion you admire and respect. Makes sense. You're an Epstein sympathizer. Hey, anything for the antifa movement, am I right??
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
