Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Underdoggers wrote:

Uhhh, perhaps because the establishment has never been so threatened until this massive defeat?

by establishment you obviously mean the ultra-rich who control the vast majority of wealth of this country

Pssst- idiot douche bag- it's called "innocent until proven guilty."

Also- might want to have some people actually say that they've seen evidence (instead of "not seeing evidence") of what you are accusing the person of.

Underdoggers wrote:

State Attorney wrote:

Add multiple state attorneys going after Trump for a variety of malfeasances. No president has ever required so many attorneys to fight so many legal issues and battles. This will only increase.

Uhhh, perhaps because the establishment has never been so threatened until this massive defeat?

"The establishment" LOL

Hey dude, I'd love to hear all about how the moon landings were faked. Although I am sure that it was "the establishment" who was behind everything. Maybe you could tell us your own "the establishment" faked the moon landings story.

Did Comey return his laptop with the "memos" on them, or did he delete the memos, which would be a felony. Also why is his friend in hiding?

EPIC Flagpole wrote:

Not a single piece of info that was exposed via Wikileaks was ever denied or questioned by the DNC. That's not "misinformation"... that's "INFORMATION."

A problem you Lib crybabies have is that you aren't able to assume any responsibility for your problems. It starts with your leaders too, as Hillary's delusional excuse-making pattern has been embarrassing to say the least. By assuming anything "swayed" voters, you're implying that they would have voted for- or even considered- Clinton.

I wasn't referring to the Wikileaks. Apparently you aren't informed. Russia was involved in a massive misinformation campaign aimed at Facebook users and other social medial users in the rust belt states. They started hundreds of fake news stories that they pushed out on social media aimed at voters in those states...stories that said fake things about Hillary and Obama. In one case, our big AM radio station here 610 WTVN in Central Ohio broadcast one of those lies as truth...that Obama arranged for his kid's grandmother to get $160,000 per year until she died from US tax payers. Their morning drive host Joel Riley stated it as fact and then he and his sidekick talked about it for several minutes just ripping Obama and saying that that was typical of Obama. It's one of the largest AM radio stations in the state, and they pushed that crap out.

Some of those voters would have voted for Clinton, but probably not many. What it did though was it helped keep some likely Clinton voters at home because they didn't want to vote for someone who was as bad as the Russians said she was, and it helped to rile up some normally less-than-interested voters to actually go pull the lever for Trump (many said they hadn't voted in several elections, but they couldn't stand to see Hillary win -- well, that hatred was helped along by Russian misinformation; I'm not saying there aren't legitimate reasons to not like her, but here in the midwest, we were inundated with fake bad news about Obama and Hillary for months. I was initially correcting Facebook posts when they would post a fake story, but it got to be too much and I gave up). Information that goes out has a big impact, otherwise Trump wouldn't complain about the "fake" news all the time.

Isn't it bad optics for Trump's go to lawyer to be representing a Russian bank and Russian billionaire right now?

[quote]elopgalF wrote:

Yes, number 1 is true you lying liberal. Do some research and at least try to sound smart. Wow, you are one dumb human being as the pedophile stuff is true, use the internet to find out. [quote]

Umm...no it isn't. That has been debunked. Maybe YOU should use the internet to find out.

A lil somethin wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

let's put it this way - the entire trump campaign is being investigated for collusion. I do believe DJT was involved with the Trump campaign. Why anyone cares if he was individually under suspicion, I have no idea.

And everyone sees that you didn't even mention obstruction, which was the cause of every impeachment we've had.

so keep yelling 'innocent!' - meanwhile the investigation goes on.

FBI

CIA

NSA

House

Senate

Special Counsel.

they'll find crimes - trump has already been found to be a criminal and tax cheat. They'll find stuff.

Pssst- idiot douche bag- it's called "innocent until proven guilty."

Also- might want to have some people actually say that they've seen evidence (instead of "not seeing evidence") of what you are accusing the person of.

sure, sure, innocent until proven guilty. We're all in agreement that an investigation has to take place. And we all see that a half dozen government agencies are investigating Donald J Trump and his campaign.

As for showing actual guilt - this is an easy one - trump has admitted using his foundation to cheat on taxes. I mean he admits taking money that he tells people will be for charity and then uses it himself.

This is not even debatable - he has admitted it. If he is willing to do such petty crimes, doncha think the investigations will find more serious crimes...ones he actually tried to hide? I mean he didn't even try to hide the charity crime - he saw it as so minor and easy. The big money laundering crimes...

establishment wrote:

Underdoggers wrote:

Uhhh, perhaps because the establishment has never been so threatened until this massive defeat?

by establishment you obviously mean the ultra-rich who control the vast majority of wealth of this country

I'm talking about the half dozen or so of those ultra rich that own all of the media companies, the media companies themselves and their puppet journalists, the middle-folk that bounce back and forth between the media companies and working for the administration in control at the time, and all the politicians that depend on the status quo as their livelihood.

Donald J Trump, and the desire for something outside of the traditional two party system, F'd up their world.

Big League Shocker wrote:

establishment wrote:

by establishment you obviously mean the ultra-rich who control the vast majority of wealth of this country

I'm talking about the half dozen or so of those ultra rich that own all of the media companies, the media companies themselves and their puppet journalists, the middle-folk that bounce back and forth between the media companies and working for the administration in control at the time, and all the politicians that depend on the status quo as their livelihood.

Donald J Trump, and the desire for something outside of the traditional two party system, F'd up their world.

oh hey the Nazis are here

What a surprise! they support Trump. Would NEVER has guessed that.

Toys R You wrote:

Ummm...no, they didn't sway me nut job but Hillary sure swayed you as only a moron would vote for a lying murderer. Oh yeah, upwards of 90 murders are linked to them, but that's just a coincidence, right? If you're married, God Bless your wife as I've never heard someone make more excuses than Bill and Hillary, except you.

Obama did what? Lied over and over and over and then said "The Republicans can go to the back of the bus". Take off your rose colored glasses goofball and learn something other than what your liberal college swayed your weak mind into believing. Honestly, you are too easy as you never provide facts.

Why do you Trumpers keep bringing up Obama and the Clintons when defending Trump? His horrible acts have nothing to do with those people. They are old news. Trump and his goons are the news. Instead of comparing him to other people, you should simply ask yourself if his behavior since being elected is Presidential and indicative of good leadership. You should ask yourself if you believe he acted inappropriately with a foreign unfriendly power. Do you believe he tells the truth? Separate yourself from your party loyalty and think of what is good for the country. Donald Trump is not good for the country and is potentially a very dangerous person.

eric a blair wrote:

Big League Shocker wrote:

I'm talking about the half dozen or so of those ultra rich that own all of the media companies, the media companies themselves and their puppet journalists, the middle-folk that bounce back and forth between the media companies and working for the administration in control at the time, and all the politicians that depend on the status quo as their livelihood.

Donald J Trump, and the desire for something outside of the traditional two party system, F'd up their world.

oh hey the Nazis are here

What a surprise! they support Trump. Would NEVER has guessed that.

Speaking of which, I wonder how many handles on this thread are really K5.

Well, you answered 1 of 3 questions. No matter how you slice it (or how angry you get) that is not a passing grade. Besides that your 'answer' for removing Comey sounds like a nice cover. Like was said, if you and your peeps did nothing wrong leave him in there and let him find nothing then you'd really be vindicated.

eric a blair wrote:

Big League Shocker wrote:

I'm talking about the half dozen or so of those ultra rich that own all of the media companies, the media companies themselves and their puppet journalists, the middle-folk that bounce back and forth between the media companies and working for the administration in control at the time, and all the politicians that depend on the status quo as their livelihood.

Donald J Trump, and the desire for something outside of the traditional two party system, F'd up their world.

oh hey the Nazis are here

What a surprise! they support Trump. Would NEVER has guessed that.

You love being a little pawn in their game. That's why you're the type of guy that changes his LRC handle after he Flagpoles. Just a lil bi+ch.

Not too bright are you? Firing Comey brought on his testimony. Of which, many people, even on the left, feel was largely a major win for Trump in terms of vindication.

After Sessions hits a home run tomorrow, you guys are going to be crying again.

Big League Shocker wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

oh hey the Nazis are here

What a surprise! they support Trump. Would NEVER has guessed that.

You love being a little pawn in their game. That's why you're the type of guy that changes his LRC handle after he Flagpoles. Just a lil bi+ch.

still you are mocking trump? That's very reasonable of you. Tell me what else you think he gets very very wrong.

Mixed Berries wrote:

partial credit.. wrote:

Well, you answered 1 of 3 questions. No matter how you slice it (or how angry you get) that is not a passing grade. Besides that your 'answer' for removing Comey sounds like a nice cover. Like was said, if you and your peeps did nothing wrong leave him in there and let him find nothing then you'd really be vindicated.

Not too bright are you? Firing Comey brought on his testimony. Of which, many people, even on the left, feel was largely a major win for Trump in terms of vindication.

.

serious people do not think comey's testimony was a victory for trump. the difference between

"your entire campaign operation is under FBI investigation"

and

"You individually are under FBI investigation"

is not material.

and firing comey was the boneheadedest move trump did. It got him a special counsel investigation. Who is going to pull on a lot of threads. And trump is, as we know, a tax avoiding criminal. he will not be unscathed.

Remember my friends, a liberal is always the smartest in the room. That's why he controls the House, Senate, Presidency and both legislative chambers in a record 32 states. That's why he froths and foams over the latest Salon and Slate rags. GIVE ME A BREAK, LOSERS. YOU LOST. YOU CONTINUE TO LOSE. HOW THOSE SPECIAL ELECTIONS GOING FOR YOU?? STOP MAKING STRAWMEN, GET OVER PARTY PROBLEMS AND C O M P E T E